and it seems like this is going to be an unremarkable interaction. the officer certainly seems very relaxed. you know, any number of -- this is like any number of annoying but unremarkable traffic stops in any city, anywhere. >> the whole first part of the tape, that's pretty much it. sort of routine, boring, even. until it isn't. >> and that's what we've got. this video does not change the basic known facts of the killing here. we do not know what happened after the man who was stopped by the police officer and then ultimately the police officer ran off-camera. there's a gap in between what we see -- there's a gap in between what we see in this traffic stop and walter scott for whatever reason getting out of that car and running away with the police officer, we can hear, in pursuit. there's a gap between that chain of events and this chain of events, in the second video, the bystander's video, where we see how it ends, just moments later, with walter scott dead in the grass. this case, understandably, with this incredible visual record of the shooti

. >> this unremarkable building in petersburg is a pro-kremlin propaganda campaign. the sign says business center with no other hint of what is going on inside. most people working here are young and nobody once to say what they are doing. marat applied for work as an online troll. there was no contract and he was paid in cash. he said there was no talking and employees had to pay a fine for being late. >> there was an atmosphere of silence and depression. we had so many tasks that we had no time to walk around. to meet your quota you had to work. >> to create the illusion that three trolls work on one topic one plays the villain and says things not in line with the authorities, another one contradicts him and the third adds balance from the kremlin perspective. marat was told what to discover on the forums of various websites. they were often local news sites from around the country. >> one time i had to convince the readers that a majority of german support putin politics. the bad guy wrote, nonsense, the germans don't like putin. then we come in and right, of cour

he describes his 12 months in nam as unremarkable. but he did get shot up pretty bad and spent months recovering for -- as he puts it -- scoring points for the other side. he says he didn't accomplish much as a corporal it was as a civilian that he left a mark. >> i started an organization with a number of talented people including a number of graduates from harvard. >> reporter: to build the monument required money, $8.4 million land some of the most valuable real estate in the u.s. on the national mall and a design and the design almost killed the dream. >> the vietnam veteran's memorial design was controversial because it was black. they said all other monuments are white. what statement are you making because it was black? >> reporter: the winning design entry was an amateurish design from this person. they saw the proposed black chevron as an ugly gash on the ground. the concept wasn't immediately clear to a lot of people. >> i have seen the original drawings and they don't look like much. did you get it right away? or did it gro

. >> he describes his 12 months in anonymous as unremarkable, mostly firing mortars but he did get shot up pretty bad and spent months recovering as he put for scoring points the ever the other side. as a holy corporate he said he didn't accomplish much, it was as a civilian nine years later he left a mark. >> i started the organization, and with the help from a lot of people, including a number of graduates from the harvard bid school, we figures out how to build this and raise the money, and we got it built. >> to build the monument requires three things money $8.4 million all from private donations, land, some of the most valuable real estate in the u.s. on the national mall. and a design. and the design almost killed the dream. >> the vietnam veterans memorial design was controversial, because it was black. all the other monuments are white, why is this one black what statement are you making because it is black. >> the winning design entry was an amateurish drawing from an unknown architecture student, who saw the proposed black chevron as an ugly gash in the ground. and open under

and become a majority issue in favor of gay marriage, young people don't think anything -- it's unremarkable, gay marriage is benign. they think the same thing about pot. pot has money on its side. which you don't have been gay marriage. states -- fiscally strapped states across the country are going to look at that pot of dough and say, i need me some of that. mark: it's been the biggest cash crop in many states and you're going to see, again, a younger breed, not just of electorate, but a younger breed of politicians doing. this i do think there will be a little bit of a pushback and a little bit of a correction in terms of how the laws are enforced and where it's available. john: if you're going to say you're going to regulate and tax and normalize, you have to have the right public safety issues in place and that. you deal with people who are smoke or high while they're driving. it's hard to detect. how do you get the tests that work? all that stuff is infrastructure stuff. in the end, if we can deal with alcohol, we can also deal with pot and i think people will figure it out. mark: up

. >> jan scruggs describes his 12 months in vietnam as mostly unremarkable mostly firing mortar but he did get shot up. and as a corporal, he didn't accomplishment. but it was a civilian, nine years later he left an indelible mark. >> i started an organization with a lot of people including graduates from harvard business school, we found out how to build this and with he did it in three years. >> it required $3.4 million, all from donations land, some of the most valuable in the u.s. on the national mall. and it the design. the design almost killed the dream. >> the vietnam veterans memorial design was controversial because it was black. they said all of the other monuments are white and why is this black? what statement are you making? >> the winning design was an amateurish drawing from an architectural student myelin. they saw it as an ugly gash in the ground, an open wound on the national mall. concept, let's say wasn't immediately clear to a lot of people, including scruggs. >> i have seen the original drawings and they don't look like of. did you love it right away? or did it ha

. >> remarkably unremarkable. infrastructure that was already in the vehicle. a couple places we already have cameras. >> they're looking at you to evaluate are you in the game, are you paying attention, are you doing what you should do as a driver? we had these cameras up here. these are looking forward. you see the auto button here. that starts the auto process. you can go hands off, feet off the car will do its thing. we put a blue glow up here from an external perspective, everyone will know it's in auto mode. >> if i wanted to stop this thing and take control myself quickly what would i do? >> you hit the wheel or a pedal or that button again. it's easy. >> does it always go the speed limit? >> it will go what it's programmed to go. >> because i don't always want to go the speed limit. >> well we were the only ones doing the speed limit coast-to-coast. that can be frustrating for driver's drivers behind you. >> when do you expect these cars to be on the road in dealerships? >> fully autonomous vehicle, 15 yea

one of the pleasures, one of the often unremarked pleasures of the reading life is when we read a writer'sack to earlier books and we see in reverse order the way they are thinking -- they are thinking evolves. there is an out-of-town quality to it. i started out saying i will read them in order and experience these books the way he did. then i outgrew it and realized one of the benefits of books, one of the benefits of being able to preserve stories and some kind of permanent form in being able to reconstruct them as you can go in some other order and experience them another way. yes. >> can you talk about the word literary arousal and how is that different than literary romance or love or something to that effect. i was curious as to why you chose the word arousal because it feels like there is a significant player rather than romance. >> yeah, i guess what i think is when we think about our reaction to books that last is a better metaphor than love. but you know it is strange. i talk about teaching in this book. as a teacher what your job is to do is to rouse your students attention. yo

remain mystified by the fact that the use of a private e-mail account apparently went unnoticed or unremarkedn during a four-year tenure in office of the former secretary. where was everyone? is there any record indicating that any lawyer, any records person, any high-level official ever respectfully confronted the former secretary with reasonable questions about the practice of sending e-mails from a private account? it is unfathomable to me that this would not have been noticed and reported up the chain or reported to the state inspector general during all of this time. in my view, there has been an institutional failure to challenge what became a strained and unreasonable reading of existing policies. we will get into the important directive and other measures that are outstanding to try to improve government during the remainder of this hour but that is my opening statement. host: let's go to the ladies. patrice: i'm patrice mcdermott. tom is one of the founding directors of our coalition. it works to make government more open, get better access to government information and push back on

remain mystified by the fact that the use of a private e-mail account apparently went unnoticed or unremarkedupon during a four-year tenure in office of the former secretary. simply put where was everyone? , is there any record indicating that any lawyer, any records person, any high-level official ever respectfully confronted the former secretary with reasonable questions about the practice of sending e-mails from a private account? it is unfathomable to me that this would not have been noticed and reported up the chain or reported to the state inspector general during all of this time. in my view, there has been an institutional failure to challenge what amounted to -- what became a strained and unreasonable reading of existing policies. we will get into the important directive and other measures that are outstanding to try to improve government during the remainder of this hour but that is my opening statement. host: let's go to the ladies. patrice: i'm patrice mcdermott. tom is one of the founding directors of our coalition. i am the executive director of openthatgovernment.org. the coali

in addition to taxation one of the issues that has been relatively unremarked upon is the fact that reclassification opens the door to a lot of taxes on the state and local level. for example, with respect to state property taxes a lot of jurisdictions tax telephone at a higher rate. in the district of columbia alone where we sit, d.c. imposes an 11% tax on gross receipts. that's immediately an 11% tax off the bottom line that the broadband providers pay which costs are going to be passed on to the consumer. the taxation aspect of this completely irrespective of the internet tax freedom act, which does not apply to fees associated with broadband is critical for us to keep mentioning. it does affect consumers where it hurts the most. >> i would -- it would impolite to suggest any senator is wrong. but i don't do healthcare anymore. i have no comment regarding that part of your point. in terms of your substantive comment on the content i might refine that and say, i do believe eventually that this item, the direction we're going, will get to edge providers. i made that point consistently. if you look

what's remarkable tom, when i watch this is how unremarkable this whole exchange is. and the police officer doesn't seem to be particularly agitated or aggressive. what do you see as a law enforcement officer when you watch this? >> that's exactly what i see, alisyn. i think what's important here is don't forget there's two investigations ongoing. one is the murder investigation. and it's pretty clear after this fact the encounter further down in the park that you know we can see at this time new york city justification for the use of deadly force. that's pretty much universally agreed at this point. given what we now know. but at the beginning of this thing, because of the civil rights investigation is he showing some type of attitude because he's dealing with a black motorist? is he does he call him names. does he show disrespect? is he done descending. is he aggressive. you see none of that. you see a textbook professional demeanor traffic stop up to that point. >> you know what's so interesting, i have a friend friends, who are police officers and what they always