will do two things, one is like mid market where there is a lot of resources but they are going unrented. if you walk down our strip of market street where offices are you see a lot of buildings where they have not be rehabd and unoccupied right now. for example the trans-bay area which was recently -- as you saw a lot of the areas of the c 3, may -- may i mason street and many buildings will also benefit. the other thing this will do is for the first time in the history of this development is great transparency, where it was never totally transparent. that has allowed a few things to happen. a few brokers who were able to corner this market and where they are able to charge large fees and people who owned historic buildings and the brokers would take this flesh. we think this will help to correct that and also the transparent -- that we create. the transbay that did support did make changes about what districts can contribute. i think it's up to larger streets. as we make changes like that now we'll be able to better understand the impact of those changes because of these annual reporti

all of you know that intrusion like this and lack of privacy will render her property reasonably unrentable. i think that it is only fair that if it took this long to figure out whether this property was not an intrusion, someone needs to step up to the plate and says that this needs to be changed. i think that it is really over doing it to put this size of a building in a neighborhood. i had the privilege of living in twin peaks many years ago and i loved it because of the peace and the quiet and the walking trails and just a lovely area. and i don't know why something of this size needs to be cramed into a neighborhood when everybody around there is explained that they don't want it. of course a building would improve their values if it was conducive to the neighborhood but it is not. and i think that somebody needs to make a decision. >> thank you. >> do you care to state your name for the record? >> cunning ham. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please? >> my name is jake, (inaudible) and i used to be on the board of supervisors, but this is just a copy of a letter and i am not sure that i