i don't unrstand why you have objection. >> because the pime need all of our attention and they are suffering cold because of sandy. we shouldn't be talking about global warming but how to help them in the cold. >> it is it a cynicical act. war is the health of the state and national are the statates oxygen. reality climate is constantly changing and using that as an excuse to get another stimulus program in a tough economy is not wrong, but cruel . i am surprised rick would g. actually not very surprised. >> victoria, what do you think about this? bloomburg is it trying to be some what sensible in saying we hav to build and be smart about it i have no doubt that politicians including bloomburg will use it as a climate change moment and ask for funds toward research and building ways . part of us say yes, we should be smart next time we build and looking at hurricanes in the 1600's, you wouldn't think it is a safe place to live, rit. >> itt has been doing pretty well. >> and bill, the fact is, from catrina, and in 2005 to sandy, 7 years lat, it was one of the lowest incidents of hurricanes in

mitchell because of these rules add thisup and the government spending, tax increase coming can unrstand when our entrepreneurs think i do not want to hire people then i want to keep my company small then i am stuck with a mandate. i am worried we become like you're up at the same time that model is falling apart. john: we did have these laws but not as many. >> as much as seven like the regulated laissez-fae economy just make sure you have enough breathing room to prosper. over time if government grows faster than a private sector that wedge means the burden of gdp, it is not like one straw causes it to collapse, but there is a tipping point*. are we five years away from being greece or italy? enty years? i don't know. this trendline is bad. happening under bush and obama. it does not work. john: good intentions and that go bad. clean energy's. >> solyndra. the tip of the a's spurred. dozens of companies go bad. the story behind the story. campaign contributors contributors, interest free loans from the government, distorting capital, it means resources are being used less productively

. >> well look, i unrstand. you may or may not like the outcome in any one trial. one situation. we don't want people who were found innocent or not guilty in the legal system but on a technicality walking the streets but what is the alternative? i mean either we have orderly pross ore don't. melissa: but, phil, do you fe like this ves overall union as black eye? cause when people look at this video, they feel like, by virtuef being part of a union, they were allowedo go bacack to work, whether that is fair or not. i understand you're saying that's not fair. maybe chrysler did violate these rules but they're saying, to the outside, this gives unions a black eye. what do you think? >> well, let m give you, y to give you a fair and balanced fox perspective on that. i think --. melissa: just answer the question any way you li. it is all good. >> i think it a fair question on the one hand i think unns ten do tend to go% too far to defend those who shouldn't necesrily be defended. for example the baseball players unn. i thk it was absu of them to go to those lengths to

one of the moves is to go out and tell people about this so they unrstand that spending $59 a gallon, money that we dn't really stop it in its tracks? this kind of ding makes me reallyant to tear my hair out? >> it should want to make yo tear your hair out. way back in '09, the first big bunchhat, t is where he came up with the i'm sorry, the $424 a gllon. we said it. we talked about it. there lot of interest. my people in my state of oklahoma, they're outraged but somehow this just doesn't seem to get out. and we have othe things. let's remember, when republicans were majority in the house and the senate and we had clinton, who was a democrat, we put work requirements in welfarr. we cut the nuer of people on welfare down from about five million to three million. then obama comes in and, so he reinstates it and takes the work requirements out and now people are outraged because we have these people on food stamp. melissa: stop this one next. this one is absolutely insane. thank you so much for coming on tonight. we appreciate your time. >> you bet. melissa: time for today's fuel gaug

so we've got to get a unrstanding that america is a country th is not ing to go backo the 1950s. wee always going to searching and growing to make ts country better and have a balanced enomy. so what do we do? we start, melissa, because over the last decade evious to president obama, we have spent like, we are running water. two ws and bush tax cuts. melissa: we afree on that. >> bush tax cuts. melissa: we have spent way too . this plan doesn't basically entitlement spending. we don't get our snding, with any ofthese three plans. even going over the cliff we don't get the spendin in order. i will giv you the last word. th we go on. >> the issue with the republicans they're losing is. they're losing the argument, the debate, they're losing everythi. what we need to do is, to respond to the question, what do we do now in three weeks? let's go aheadand give 98% of the american people a tax t. none of us are ignoring the viability and importance of looking at entitlement reform as it relates to savings getting rid of waste fraud and abuse and other aspects. i will not tolerate increa

rowe price, we unrstand the connections of a colex, global economy. 75% of our mutual funds beat their 10-year lipper average. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. request a prospectus or summary prospectus with investment information, risks, fees and expenses to read and consider carefull before investing. stuart: ed asner does not seem party -- sorry about a cartoon he voiced for the california teachers' union showing a rich guy urinating on poor people. producer sean hannity asked about it. >> you remember the video? >> they agreed to do it. i approve this message. >> the most controversial, talk about things trickling down like ridge people peeing on poor people. >> should be reversed. >> you don't remember -- >> you have any money? stuart: isn't that cute? charles have a reaction to ed asner. charles: should had the initiative and with tommy chong in the last bit. he was really slurring his words. he is one of these guys who is proud of his handiwork i don't care what it is and he proved it. it is pretty despicable. stuart: a rich man like him