. >> here's a quick, very unscientific test. >> trying new things can kind of be intimidating sometimes>> depends what it is, honestly. if it's out of my boundaries, i'm not willing to do that. >> i guess it depends on the mistake i am making. if it is a very big mistake it's hard for me to move on from that. >> it's hard for me at first, but then i get over it. >> i would say most of the time i can usually let things go and move on with my life. >> yeah, i mean, currently, in my life, there are many mistakes and you just, like, you got to let them go to keep on moving forward. >> i'm usually able to move on from things pretty quickly. >> sometimes i get nervous to make eye contact with new people, so -- but i try. >> yeah, i usually try. >> not all the time, but it depends i guess, if i feel comfortable or not. >> i would say that in most situations, i'm fairly confident. if you answered "yes" to these questions, then you probably don't have an issue with self-esteem. but a surprising number of teens aren't so self assured. in fact, 3 out of 4 girls with low self-esteem are likely to f

over the past two days, i've gone on twitter and then one of those unscientific holes with four options. one, trump will win the nomination for the convention. two, he will win at the convention. number three, ted cruz will win the nomination. matchesy on the pole exactly what my reporting finds -- there is a total disparity on what people think is going to happen with trump winning at the convention being the scenario that is the least addicted. the others are basically tied. this is not scientific but of those four choices, which do you think at this point is the most likely outcome? campbell: i think it is more scientific and a lot of polls we have seen. and if they follow me on twitter, they are people of refine taste. campbell: i think for trump, he has to win on the first ballot. don't you think most people have conceded as much? certainly see that things become much dicier. that is notthink the most likely. i think it becomes about ted cruz and his organizing. using ted cruz at the convention is most likely? campbell: i think it is. does wellink of trump in northeast and wins ind

over the past few days i have gone on twitter and done an unscientific twitter poll with four options, one, trump will win before the convention. two, trump will win at the convention, three, ted cruz will win, or four, some other outcome. the tallies match exactly what my reporting finds. there is a total disparity between what people think is going to happen with trump winning at the convention the scenario at least predicted and the other three are basically tied. this is not scientific, but now i will last you to vote. of those four choices, which is the most likely outcome? campbell: i think it is more scientific than a lot of the polling we have seen. mark: a big sample. and if they follow me on twitter, they have refined taste. campbell: there you go. for trump, he has to win on the first ballot. don't you think that most of the trump people you are talking to have conceded as much? mark: they won't go all the way and say it is the only way to win, but they see that things become a lot dicier. i'm asking the most likely, not to break down the possibilities. campbell: i think th

here are our admittedly unscientific results. >> what do these emojis mean to you? >> penis. ass. taco. or -- vagina. sex. >> what does this emoji mean to you? >> [ bleep ]. ass. taco tuesday. >> or? >> vagina. finger [ bleep ]ing. >> whoa. i think you mean finger love-making? >> that means -- my wiener. >> usually it indicates a penis. >> it's a shaft used for pleasure. >> means eggplant. >> or? >> or a squash. >> or? >> or a -- it's not a pepper, i know that. >> purple pepper? it's an eggplant. >> or? >> i can't say it. my kids will be watching. an eggplant, a purple eggplant. with a green top. that i would like to eat. >> oh my goodness. >> it looks like a [ bleep ]. >> a tomato? >> a butt? >> could be innocent fruit. it also tends to be ass cheeks. >> booty. >> female butt. rear-end. >> that makes me hungry, i love tacos. who doesn't? >> oh. well, all right. to each his own. >> taco. but i also know it's not a taco. >> go right and then go through something. >> what can it be? >> anything you want. >> oh, all right. >> pull my finger. >> no, thank you. >> oh, that look like --

i did an unscientific poll of white and black people. the african-americans that are supporting trump like the fact he's shaking things up. he's looking at the issue of the border and immigration. there's a fine line between shaking up and going too far. i don't know. he appeals to the people who, the fringe. the fringe of this country who feel they are disenfranchised and feel there's not, there's a portion of that. >> i think there's a lot of people that want this system shaken up. >> i think that's right. you see that bernie sanders side as well. >> he wants it changed in particularly direction. i'm not sure trump has a direction. he's just shaking it up. >> he just says he will make it great again without telling us how he will get that done or what the policies are. it seems and maybe ed can speak to this. you have a politician may have high unfavorables but you have people kind of undecided. they might be persuadable, they might be won over. because he comes out of tv, what works on tv really well. either you watch the apprentice b

we can't have some unscientific poll shaking claire's confidence. phil... what poll? too late.s this, a witch hunt? oh, my god. i have to go. well, i just don't think it's a big deal. i mean, how many people read the "weekly..." "saver"? "saver," anyway? 22,000... ish. my company adver-- used to advertise with that newspaper.

. >> that analysis seems to be spot on at least according to the unscientific survey of voters we havedone here. all seem to be very well read such as eileen. >> this is really hard election and i just felt he was the lesser of all the evils. i just felt from what i was reading and watching that he just seemed like the better one, candidate. >> shep, eileen said she is a democrat but she registered as a republican and voted for ted cruz today. shep, back to you. >> thanks from wakashaw there today. paying for somebody's vote can land you in prison. you can't pay for a vote but bribing a delegate to vote for you is a whole different thing because today is not a federal elections commission election, it's a private thing done by a party. so bribing is okay? regarding delegates? our senior analyst says yes. that's next. it takes a lot of work... to run this business. but i really love it. i'm on the move all day long... and sometimes, i just don't eat the way i should. so i drink boost® to get the nutrition that i'm missing. boost complete nutritional drink has 26 essential vitamins and m

our unscientific survey found 60% of you want to keep the penny. yeah, it's live right now. j.j.ld keep the penny. we'd hate to lose phrases like a penny for your thoughts and this is my lucky penny. another commenter says her kids have penny wars in school every year where each class competes to collect the most to win a prize. other than that, no, we don't need it. i don't know. they kind of clog up my wallet. i'm going to say no. thanks for being part of "the real story." >> announcer: now, "sheprigard smith reporting." live from the fox news deck. >>> everything changed. we said here yesterday if hillary clinton and donald trump could just score big wins in the new york primary this t. could happen. and it did. everything changed. now clinton talking togetherness rolling like a nominee. and trump, he's not said lyin' ted since before new york voted. doesn't need to because donald trump wiped the floor with ted cruz and niz his new york values. ted cruz got nothing, not a single delegate. and donald trump almost ran the table. today in an everything changed world nobody on the

cal perry has been conducting his own fascinate, unscientific hoosier poll.yes, a little bit like our food fight, right, but combined it. we want empirical data on indiana. live voters here. they're going to come in and vote. before they do, let me explain. the democrats for one jar, i've got donald trump for the middle and your cruz/kasich alliance here. trying to draw out the kasich voters. see how we do. do your democratic duty, civil duty. >> there you. >> another one. democrats landslide here in indianapolis. who do you like? >> also democrats. do you have a particular candidate on the democratic side? >> sanders. >> sanders. any of the republican candidates interest you at all? >> no. >> why not? >> i don't trust them. >> you don't trust? >> their policy, i don't trust their arguments. >> indiana's a conservative state. how do you explain this? indianapolis? >> yes. you're in the city. >> come here, nathan, why have you voted on the democratic ticket? >> i just -- i really enjoy the progressive views that both those two guys hold -- guy and lady when it

however, an unscientific study -- i have three kids in their 20s. i checked with them and i say do you guys remember your first experience with explicit racism? every single one of them does. they are in their 20s which tells us what? the generation between the two of us has not changed the existence and presence of explicit racism and the people of color in this nation today. i want to make that clear because that's not what i'm talking about. i'm not talking about explicit racism. i'm talking about implicit racism. implicit bias, all three of those terms are used interchangeably. let me start by defining them. unconscious racism is what happens when your stored social knowledge, the information you take for the music you hear on the radio, the movie is presented to you commend the television stories, the discourse you've been watching the political debates and conversations, all of this is social knowledge and then current just part of your mind. it is triggered when you encounter a person of another race involuntarily. you call up that knowledge

and very unscientific talking to folks, we seem to be hearing a lot out that. now, what that does, if those things hold up, what will that do to the race? the way the delegates are allotted here in this race, even if donald trump does lose statewide, there are-- the republican delegates are allocated some statewide to the statewide winner, some winner take all in congressional districts. and given his support in the northern part of the state, it's possible that donald trump could walk away tonight with a handful of delegates, not a lot, but when he has that much lead, every little bit helps. on the democratic side, the delegates are apportioned proportionally. so if the race is as close as the preelection polls indicate, even if she loses, hillary hilly clinton's going to walk away with a good share of the delegates tonight. >> ifill: all of these candidates have already decamped to the next battleground, haven't they? >> reporter: actually, sanders was make something last-minute stops here this morning, trump as well. the only candidate who is going to be her

more than 2,000 people have voted in my unscientific poll over the past 48 hours. the tallies match exactly what my reporting finds. there is a total disparity what people think is going to happen with trump winning at the convention that is far and away the least predicted, the other three are basically tied. this is not scientific, campbell, but i'm going to ask you to vote. of those four choices, what do you think at this point is the most likely outcome? >> first of all, i think it's more scientific than a lot of the polling we've seen. >> 4,000 people. if they follow me on twitter, they're people of refined taste, discernment. >> i think for trump he has to win on the first ballot. don't you think that most of the trump people that you're talking to have conceded as much, that that is -- >> they won't go all the way and say it's the only way to win. they see things becoming a lot diceyer. not to break down the possibilities, what is the most likely. >> i think that is not the most likely at this stage. i think it goes to the second and third. i think it become

reporter: very unscientific sampling of voters who have cast their ballots here verifies that assessment. here is eileen. >> this is really hard election and i just felt he was the lesser of all the evils. i just felt from what i was reading and watching, that he just seemed like the better one candidate. reporter: she is referring there to ted cruz. she cast herbal lot for ted cruz. she told us she is democrat and registered today as a republican. back to you, in new york, david. david: a lot of those switch overs happening this year. dug, thank you very much. >> that's right. melissa: 42 delegates in the path to the nomination at stake in tonight's republican primary. trump's challengers are hoping to close in on his delegate lead and make it difficult for the front-runner to win the nomination. the outcome could make a messy floor fight at republican national convention even more likely. we have former wisconsin governor tommy thompson and kasich's national chair. thanks for joining us. the sound bite of the woman came before us, said she is registered democrat who crossed over to vot

. >>> told you earlier about msnbc's cal perry's completely thoroughly, entirely, unscientific poll he'ss. the hoosier pick poll. cal joins me with results. how it's going, cal? >> reporter: yeah, totally unsanctioned. but here we go. the idea of the poll to get to your cruz/kasich alliance to wry to get to voters. we found some. this is joe lee. take a listen. >> i voted for john kasich, because he's the only adult in the room, so to speak, on either side, in my humble opinion. and then this deal comes out, all of this stuff. >> alliance. >> which i'm not sure it's a real good alliance but it's out there. so here we are. >> if you knew the alliance was going to happen, who would you have voted for? >> i don't know i would have voted. >> the democratic one is your outlier. we're in a liberal part of indiana. trump 2-1 over your cruz/kasich alliance. funniest thing all day, someone with a family, elderly lady, made all of her family turn around, voted democratic and ran out of the mall. >> they're telling me the decision desk decided to call indiana based on your jelly beans five days ear

get bernie sanders is being deeply unscientific when it comes to cracking.tudies say there's no groundwater contamination. but your common adverse health effects. boomtown economic effects. save us from that. it's bogus. stuart: you are laughing. i've seen the devastation that non-tracking rings. it's outrageous. >> i went to college in new york which is an economically distressed for three generations. i am very familiar with the western part of the state. my son is a student out there. it would be a great boom in the western part of the state and the government should let it happen. this is a terrible policy in new york city which never quite thinks about where it all comes from when they throw the switch on their air-conditioning. stuart: those who live in new york city and can't stand the bugs. i want to move on to the university of missouri which has been the scene of several race related protest the past year. trillion, that school is now in real trouble. >> i think for dorm so close. they see fund-raising way down. they see enrollment significantly do

we thought we'd do this unscientific method of polling the audience here in new york city to see howbetter results. there's one out of like 20 so far. this guy wants to pull in. all right. very interesting. >> beep beep. >> there's another one. beep beep beep. oh, we're going to pause for a second because there's a police officer right there and probably wouldn't like me having the big sign. a.j., come over here. hey, good morning! oh, look, they're going to vote. yeah. [ sirens ] >> okay, you know what? i'm learning that more people are going to be voting on 48th street than 6th avenue, avenue of the americas. go vote! go vote! couple of times. just imagine you're in chicago. all right. heather nauert, have you voted yet today? >> no, i'm registered as an independent so i vote here in the state of new york. maybe next time. >> then you can't honk. >> in the general election. see, nobody is out there. it's rush hour, 8:35 on the east coast, what's up with that? >> i know it. >> all right. good morning to you, i hope you're off to a good day. at least one american is dead in the ecuad

starbucks telling nbc news the lawsuit and our experiment are unscientific and without merit. with two labs who helped device our method. starbucks says it ignored how lattes are composed and the hand-prepared nature of our beverages increases the likelihood of variationn cup. >> maybe an ounce or two at a time. how many million cups and how many consumers and how many weeks a year? big bucks out of consumer's pockets and into starbucks' pocket. >> next time you get a latte, take it like this. open up the lid to look how much is there. starbucks says if you don't like it, they're happy to make you a new one. >> all right. >> really? >> remind me not to have you go to starbucks in the next week or two. >> what do you have tomorrow? >> we're continuing the real deal, talking about the coin counting machines at grocery stores and banks. you save up your loose change and then take it to cash in. are those machines accurate? we wonder. my team and i tested them out, getting hundreds of dollars in coins from the bank and dumping it into the coin counters. you may want to hold on the