t extremely unseemingly. it's a problematic thing. i think congress could change some of the rule and eliminate some. >> that statute applies to justices, by the way, section 455. whatever the judicial conference can do the statute does apply. they get the final word on it. >> before i open it up to general question, i want to -- just ask each of you to answer one or two questions. neil, you talked about the imagine -- majesty of the court and the uniquenesses of the supreme court, and the justices, when asked about these issues often put it in term of the sort of supreme court exceptionalism that the court is uniquely apolitical, unelected, unlike any other court and unlike any branch or level of government and the justicings say, you know, we have a unique court and don't want to mess it up. .. >> that's what the supreme court is about the ability to do something like that against popular sentiment ideas the we should be really careful when we start imposing solutions of them i do agree with certain personalities with cameras in the

i think it's quite unseemingly we're having the discussion. the reason we're having the discussion justices have leaf tenure. they can stay as long as they want. we know that the practices is one with few exeengs of strategic technology. can set up a system for having term limit for supreme court justices and enacted by statute under which they would have 18-year term staggered two-year term so every president would get two appointee and there would be no strategic retirements. the justices would become senior justices, they would be paid in full and, by the way, you would have a supreme court justice ready to sit in and step in for them. >> thanks. for those who haven't been in the the court. when the court has a decision whoever wrote the majority opinion summarizes it. we asked why can't we get the audio of that? as you know, if you have heard it, it's usually pretty good. and sometimes quite vivid alive, pretty juicy. and what we've been told i'm struggling here to describe how we've been told. by authorityive member of the court is -- [la