some of it is extraordinarily vague and unspecific and there's no clear timetable. some of them may be more down that threat to see what happens. i'm not aware of anything that was specific in the sense that would have given a premonition of particular action in paris that would allow for law enforcements or military actions to disrupt it. with respect to the broader issue of my critics and answer the question earlier i think when you listen to what they actually have to say what they are proposing most of the time when pressed they describe things that we are already doing and member we are not aware we are already doing them and some of them seem to think i'm more bellacoase in expressing what we difference because that seems to be the only thing that they are doing is talking as it if they are tough but i have seen particular strategies they would suggest that would make a real difference. few exceptions. primary exception is those that would deploy u.s. troops on large scale to retake territory either in iraq or now in syria and at least they have honesty to go

back to brussels members of nato have been told to stay home for an unspecific isified amount of time. >> anchor: republican candidate donald trump with controversial comments about the september 11 attacks. candidate trump told supporters in alabama that "thousands and thousands of people in jersey city, new jersey cheered as the world trade center towers fell in 2001." . >>> thousands of people were cheering so something is going on. we have to find out what it is. >> anchor: trump's comments are being condemned by the anti- anti-defamation league in a statement the group says it's unfortunate trump is giving new life to a long debunked conspiracy tiery. trump also said he would bring back water boarding foster or suspects if he is elected. >> anchor: there is still much more to come here on 7 news at 5:00 including a dangerous encounter on 9 streets sparking a massive manhunt in new orleans at 5:30 a uconn student getting a taste of his own medicine after that meltdown over macand cheese. >> anchor: a muslim student spreading a message of peace with open arms . >> anchor: in one ho

some of it is extraordinarily vague and unspecific. there's no clear timetable. some of it maybe more specific and folks chase down that threat to see what happens. i'm not aware of anything that was specific in the sense that would have gave a premonition about an attack in paris that would allow for law enforcement or military actions to disrupt it. with respect to the broader issue of my critics, to some degree i answered the question earlier. i think that when you listen to what they actually have to say, what they're proposing, most of the time when pressed they describe things that we're already doing. maybe they're not aware we're already doing them. some of them seem to think that if i were just more bellicose in expressing what we're doing that that would make a difference because that seems to be the only thing they're doing is talking as if they're tough. i am seeing particular strategies that they would suggest that would make a real difference. the primary exception is if those who would deploy u.s. troops on a large scale to retake territory either

media we control so again, a pretty comprehensive list i think this is my last slides some of the unspecific televised hoping e hopefully with a video from our manage and encouraging people to do that and go to the supervisors offices we talked about that the supervisor aid last week want them on camera signing up for super green for their personal message with the advocates meeting on the 9 and a couple of ideas i'll call out one an event where the price of admission is super green sign up some beverages non-alcoholic, of course, and some something to eat and neglecting event you'll come to this and sign up for super green or bring a friend to sign up and a couple of fun judge's as well that's it for my outreach slides so if you have any questions if not thank you furbishing i got a cue a draft t-shirt and we had the final in two or three weeks as long as you sign up for super green we'll get you one everyone in the audience and using those for contests to encourage the super green sign ups. >> do they come in bigger sizes (laughter). >> yes, a size for everyone. >> well, for all those folk

some of it is extraordinarily vague and unspecific, and there is no clear time table. some of it may be more specific, and then folks chase down that threat to see what happens. i'm not aware of anything that was specific in the sense that would have given a premonition about a particular action in paris that would allow for law enforcement on military actions to disrupt it. >> new propaganda from isis plans to carrying out a s similar attack in washington, d.c. the director of the cia john brennan warns the paris attack is likely to be followed by more. >> i would not consider it a one-off event. it is clear to me that isil has an external agenda that they are determined to carry out these types of attacks. this is not something that was done in a matter of days. this was something that was deliberately and carefully planned over the course of several months, in terms of making sure they had the operatives, the weapons, the explosives with the suicide belts. so i would anticipate that this is not the only operation that isil has in the pipeline. i do believe that this

some of it is extraordinarily vague and unspecific, and there is no clear timetable. some of it may be more specific, and then folks chasing down that threat to see what happens. i'm not aware of anything that was specific in the sense that would have given a premonition of a particular action in paris that would allow for law enforcement or military actions to disrupt it. with respect to the broader issue of my critics, to some degree i answered the question earlier. when you listen to what they have to say, what they're proposing, most of the time when pressed they're describing things that we're lord doing. a maybe they're not aware that we're already doing them. some seem to think that if i were to be more bellicose in expressing what we're doing that would make a difference. because that's the only thing that they're doing, talking as if they're tough. but i haven't seen particular strategies that they would suggest that would make a real difference. now, there are a few exceptions. like i said, the primary exception are those who would deploy u.s. troops on a la

i'm sure whatever intercepts they have may be unspecific. it's going to be extraordinarily difficult to work out which parts of an already very opaque isis leadership structure may have been involved in telling anybody in paris to act at the times they did. if that even was the case, because jim himself has been reporting that some of those suspects, in fact, went dark. one of the major giveaways being for cells like this, in the west, when they actually communicate back with their hq in whatever place they were originally trained to activate the plots they had, that's often the giveaway that give the plot away in the first place. but the question now remains, this is clearly france saying we will respond militarily. that could be it. remember back in the '90s where al qaeda would be hit, perhaps in the wrong place or the right place, by the clinton administration, and that would be considered to be it, sort of the anger would be vented through a series of airstrikes. we could be seeing this tonight with the publicized pictures of french jet

some of it is extraordinarily vague and unspecific and there's no clear timetable.e of it may be more specific and folks chased on that thread to see what happens. i am not aware of anything specific in the sense of giving a premonition about an action in paris that would allow for law enforcement or military actions to disrupt it. with respect to the broader issue of my critics, to some degree i answered earlier. i think that when you listen to what they actually have to say, what they are proposing, most of the time when pressed, they describe things we are already doing. maybe they are not aware we are doing them. some of them seem to think that if i were just more bellicose in expressing what we were doing, that would make a difference. that seems to be the only thing they are doing. talking as if they are tough. i have not seen particular strategies that they would suggest that would make a real difference. there are a few exceptions. the primary exception is those who would deploy u.s. troops on a large scale to retake territory either in iraq or in syria. at

some of it is extraordinarily vague and unspecific and there is no clear timetable. some of it may be more specific and folks chase down that threat to see what happens. i'm not aware of anything that was specific in the sense that it would've given a premonition about a particular action in paris that would have allowed for law enforcement or military actions to disrupt it. with respect to the broader , to somemy critics degree, i answered the question earlier. i think that when you listen to what they actually have to say, what they are proposing, most of theyime when pressed describe things that we are already doing. they be they are not aware that -- maybeady doing them they are not aware that we are already doing that. moremay think if i were bellicose and expressing what we were doing that that would make a difference because that seems to be the only thing that they , talking as if they are tough. but i've not seen particular strategies that they would suggest that would make a real difference. few exceptions. as i said, the primary exception is those that wou

some of it is extraordinary vague and unspecific and there's no clear timetable. some of it may be more specific and then folks chase down that threat to see what happens. i'm not aware of anything that was specific in the sense that would have given a premonition about a particular action in paris that would allow for law enforcement or military actions to disrupt it. with respect to the broader issue of my critics, to some degree i answered the question earlier. i think that when you listen to what they actually have to say, what they're proposing, most of the time when pressed they describe things that we're already doing. maybe they're not aware that we're already doing them. some of them seem to think that if i were just more bellicose in expressing what we're doing that would make a difference because that seems to be the only thing that they're doing is talking as if they're tough, but i haven't seen particular strategies that they would suggest that would make a real difference. now, there are a few exceptions and as i said, the primary exception is those

it's evaluated, some of it is extraordinarily vague and unspecific. there's no clear timetable.e of it may be more specific. and then folks chase down that threat to see what happens. i'm not aware of anything that was specific in the sense that given a premonition of the action in paris that would allow for law enforcement or military actions to disrupt it. with respect to the broader issue of my critics, to some degree i answered the question earlier. when you listen to what they actually have to say, what they're proposing, most of the time when pressed they describe things that we're already doing. many that we're already doing. some of them seem to think if i was more bellicose in expressing what we're doing, that that would make a difference. that seems to be the only thing they're doing, is talking as if they're tough. but i have not seen particular strategies that they would suggest that would make a real difference. now there are a few exceptions. as i said, the primary exception is those who would deploy u.s. troops on a large scale to retake territory either in iraq o

some of it is extraordinarily vague and unspecific and there's no clear timetable.be more specific, and then folks chase down that threat to see what happens. i am not aware of anything that was specific in the sense that would have given a premonition about a particular action in paris that would allow for law enforcement or military actions to disrupt it. with respect to the broader issue of my critics, to some degree i answered the question earlier. i think that when you listen to what they actually have to say, what they're proposing, most of the time when pressed, they describe things that we're already doing. maybe they're not aware that we're already doing them. some of them seem to think that if i were just more bellicose in expressing what we're doing that that would make a difference, because that seems to be the only thing that they're doing is talking as if they're tough. but i haven't seen particular strategies that they would suggest that would make a real difference. now, there are few exceptions. as i said, the primary exception is those who would de

some of it is extraordinarily vague and unspecific. and there's no clear timetable.t may be more specific. and then folks chase down that threat to see what happens. i'm not aware of anything that was specific in the sense that would have given a premonition about a particular action in paris that would allow for law enforcement or military actions to disrupt it. with respect to the broader issue of my critics, to some degree i answered the question earlier. i think when you listen to what they actually have to say, what their proposing, most of the time when pressed they describe things we're already doing. maybe they're not aware that we're already doing them. some of them seem to think if i was just more bellicose in expressing what we're doing, that that would make a difference. because that seems to be the only thing that they're doing. is talking as if they're tough. but i haven't seen particular strategies that they would suggest that would make a real difference. now, there are a few exceptions. as i said, the primary exception is those who would deploy u.s.

and they explained it to me he didn't say anything until he issued his order he cited unspecific researchid that he felt that the research proved that children do better in the homes where there are heterosexual parents so he wanted the child removed. >> does he have that discretion in state of utah? what's the law in who can have foster kids and who can adopt. >> the law doesn't discriminate against same-sex parents in utah. if you are legally married a foster parent you can have children in your home. state attorneys are looking at this doed for the division of child and family services to see if there's any avenue for appeal. i should say -- >> they support this couple, right? the children and family services group, the case worker assigned to the child as an advocate for the child they all want the child to stay with the couple? >> that's correct. and the child has a guardian ad litum the attorney that represents the chime the mother herself told the judge believes april and becky love her daughter as much as she does and wants her child in that home. >> the judge's 2014 performance e

some of it is extraordinarily vague and unspecific and there's no clear timetable. it may be more specific and then folks chase down that threat to see what happens. i'm not aware of anything that was specific in the sense that would have given a premonition about a particular action in paris that would allow for law enforcement or military actions to disrupt it. with respect to the broader issue of my critics, to some degree, i anticipated the question earlier. i think that when you listen to what they actually have to say, what they're proposing, most of the time when pressed, they describe things that we're already doing. maybe they're not aware that we're already doing them. some of them seem to think that if i were just more bellicose in expressing what we're doing, that that would make a difference because that seems to be the only thing that they're doing is talking as if they're tough, but i haven't seen particular strategies that they would suggest that would make a real difference. now, there are few exceptions, as i said, a primary exception is those who