writing some draftsmenship because the president is funding his, in my opinion, illegal, unsuppose ofrtrtedunsupported, not allowed immigration memberim immigration memoranda, they will have to find the right words to reign it in. i think it will pass the house with ease. i would not be surprised if it didn't get more than 60 votes in the senate to reign it in in which case the president will have to veto and we'll have a battle over veto override. >> you're referring to the fees talking about citizenship and immigration services, by the sheer numbers involved here, it is clear to anyone who has paid much attention to the cis and its management and its highly inefficient and unproductive organization, it will be swamped, it will be brought to a standstill. there's no way in the world for cis to deliver on the president's promises. do the republicans have an opportunity to just hoist the president on his own if you will -- >> you're right. let's say the republicans pass through the house and pass through the senate the language that keeps him from spending dhs funds of whatever sort either by congress

writing some draftsmenship because the president is funding his, in my opinion, illegal, unsuppose ofrtrtedunsupported, not allowed immigration memberim immigration memoranda, they will have to find the right words to reign it in. i think it will pass the house with ease. i would not be surprised if it didn't get more than 60 votes in the senate to reign it in in which case the president will have to veto and we'll have a battle over veto override. >> you're referring to the fees talking about citizenship and immigration services, by the sheer numbers involved here, it is clear to anyone who has paid much attention to the cis and its management and its highly inefficient and unproductive organization, it will be swamped, it will be brought to a standstill. there's no way in the world for cis to deliver on the president's promises. do the republicans have an opportunity to just hoist the president on his own if you will -- >> you're right. let's say the republicans pass through the house and pass through the senate the language that keeps him from spending dhs funds of whatever sort either by congress