so the enterprise use public clouds as untrustworthy, and reliable, and scary, and yet, every single enterprise employee uses it. on the enterprise client, and all their own. and of 40 walks in with their own network nowadays, and the process enterprise data on the rise, and they probably -- it probably drag it into something like dropbox. tim mentioned an interesting statistic of how many people said they were using cloud. the only thing that is interesting is cio's who do not know that they are using every form a cloud that is available. this is the charge again. if the employee wants to be productive, a well-intended employee wants to be productive, just to send an e- mail to a colleague, and bounces off, so they drag it in dropbox and send it publicly, and suddenly all your data is in the cloud whether you like it or not, and the cio has no clue. the consumerization challenge is the challenge for adoption of the cloud. broadly, from an automation perspective, it is the case that for the omission build you a much more reliable concept. i happen to be a passionate fan of the models

>> so native americans are herrings to him, just fishy, untrustworthy people? >> yeah, that need to be caught and fed to our government penguins? >> yeah. >> jon: i think that's a reach. >> it is? >> it is, jon? >> is it? is it? >> it is really a reach, jon? >> is it? is it? >> is it really reaching that far? because after you see this, you might owe us an apology. >> the great white hope. >> the blue dog, the red dog, the yellow dogs. >> the white man. >> the white lie. purple-state votedders. >> brown shirts. >> red handed. >> the yellow lobster. [laughter] jon jon guy,er got to tell you, i think that one literally was about a yellow lobster. >> really, jon? you don't think he was talking about china? really? an asian lobster all yellow with its pinchers collapsed around the nuts of america? oh, i wonder how that lobster would sound to ed schultz. oh, hello, i'm a lobster. hello, look at my claws. hew-wow. >> jon: that is offensive. >> it is offensive. shame on you, schultz. look what you've done. >> i can't get the bad man out of my brain. >> jon: john olive

and the public clout is been generally branded by the enterprise segment as being untrustworthy unless it is backed by a particular promise to have some major brand like microsoft or google or whatever. what has been lacking has been standards related to a customer of visibility to reason about the cloud. but we have some good anecdotal evidence that people will focus on a cloud for a living will do a far better job than you would ever if you were building your own i.t. system. a good way to think about this would be if you look back on wikileaks and what followed, it turned out they were hosting on amazon, and when amazon pulled that, anonymous launched an attack on a bunch of different web sites. everybody who was running their own data center was down in a heartbeat.

but he was untrustworthy from the beginning. the only thing i would add and to go back to your brilliant executive producer because all of your staff is brilliant, he is right. this also goes back it bill clinton. bill clinton had his problems. but the effort to delegitimize him, to say he is involved with drugs, with murder, with foster coming from jerry, coming from the project be a even from congress, it was similar. it wasn't the same but it was similar. there is a real dehumananization of this man. >> the worst thing that someone can say is that he is not american. they usually accept that the other sides is american, they just usually call them idiots. the worst thing you can say about a right winger. the worst thing to say about a left winger, he is not one of us. >>> here he is talking about the president using street corner hustler term saying he conned us into believing he was a citizen. this is donald trump thought here. let's listen. >> i would like to have him show his birth certificate. and to be honest with you, i

have as untrustworthy? gen it comes down to credibility and you blow that and people do not want to trust your stored. >> when the people known as the audience use their tools to inform one another, that a citizen journalism. >> i have a problem with someone in a basement getting pancakes' delivered by their mother at the same time they are bringing down the government. >> if you look at the history of this country, the first amendment, the first amendment not by accident -- >> cuts make us less nimble and less responsive. or i think we still have it but i would not be in the profession. >> the old media was over the lunch -- and it used to be the revolution. >> now we have to reinvent ourselves. >> joining me today moving from further away, the editor and senior vice president of american journalism review. an author and educator and journalist and must immediately for on this but doesn't for national public radio. and the managing editor for the "milwaukee sentinel." if i can start with you, perhaps, as t

perspective of the arab world in particular, we are the crusaders and we are as dangerous and untrustworthyas many americans consider many people in the islamic world to be. and that awareness of american fallibility announced as often as it has been announced by barack obama is something quite different. there've been some american presidents who on some occasions have hinted, not quite as forthrightly as he's done on multiple occasions. that of course infuriates many americans who do think america has never made a mistake. but i think is a response, the international response both to the nobel prize address in the cairo address, you could hear the enthusiasm for a very different to have an american president on america. now as these cataclysmic changes of the last few months have unfolded, very many people who are very widespread in america is now looking as if it might be in favor of change. but i think it is impossible for us really to know, as steve mentioned, how this is not going to turn out. one example that ensures on all of your minds, do we get into libya or giving icann should t

they're untrustworthy, incapable, unclean, it's a disaster. they're aware of it. stereotype, and they perform accordingly. so let's affirm them. what we do here isn't soup kitchens in trenton. people come for a meal, on the way out standard information is done in writing, but they don't always write so well, so they walk into a room, and they speak for 30 seconds into a tape. and they describe the meal they had, in the experimental case they describe something that affirms them, something recently they've experienced that made them feel good. on the way out we make available two kind of benefits packages for which these people are eligible, and we simply o serve how many take them -- observe how many take them. i have no illusion, these are packages that are difficult. but if you just look at how many avail themselves of the package, okay, i'll try, it goes from 16-46%. they're three times more likely to take this package if you befriend them for 30 seconds than just let them feel the way they do. and finally you'll recognize this, we