it was a sold a bill of goods, c untruth,ap and trade is, health care. -- it was a sold a bill of goods, anuntrue, cap and trade is. he has already failed. he has failed but not to the way i hoped. he has failed the american people. he has done nothing for them that they thought was going to happen. they don't have jobs, they don't have rising incomes. we don't have anything positive happening. i wanted him to fail in implementing this stimulus because i knew this would happen. greta: you are rooting for failure, i want success but i don't think we will get it because the numbers. >> i am rottinoting for american success. it is now six months later, look at what obama is doing. this is a disaster. this is a disaster for individual americans. i did not want this to happen. i want everyone to succeed. i want everyone to be prosperous. angreta: me, too. >> this is not how you do it. how did we come out of the '82 recession? we cut tax rates. we cut capital gains. we got out of people possib's w. obama has contempt for the american people, he wants the government to be the focus. he has a d

she said that kids are untruthful all the time. she really started minimizing casey anthony's actions. so i think prosecutors were pretty, i'm sure they're very organized, and hit her with some tough questions. >> no doubt. tamara, if you're jose baez in there, what are you listening for? what notes are you taking so you can mine mize any damage to your client through all this? >> you know, i think there's not much she can do. i think cindy anthony has damaged herself already. they have so many other statements that she's made. so the state here is really trying to add an additional court record that may be conflicting from what she said before. so this is just an effort for them to destroy her credibility. she is a witness. they want to destroy her credibility. and it's interesting, because i don't think that jose baez can make objections. however, i do think that her attorney will be in there making objections on the record if he does not want a certain question to be asked. we don't know if he's in there or not. but that will be

those are untruths." that dr. coburn won't give any details about what he didsay to e senator about the affai because he said, "i was counseling hims a pysician and as an ordained deacon. that is privileged comnication that i wilnever reveal to committee, not to a cot law, not tanybody." given that tom coburn is an ob/gyn, not actly clear in what capacity he might he been treating senator ensign. also not clear why h doctor/patient cfidentiality would preclude him from answering qutions about the engn affair but would allow hito make lots of statements about the affair that really portray himself in a good light. about the other half that the doctor ss he was wearing when he counseled senator ensign at of a deacon brinng in a religious group pes to be the connectiveissue linking both. it's a secretive christian organization kno as t fellowship or the fily. they run a house kwn as c reet whereators coburn and ensign live together with otr law makers in washington, d.c. doug hampton talked out c reet and its members

e are untruths." .n wotgive dames on what he did say to the senate about th affair becausehe said, i was counseling him as physician and as an ordained deacon. that i pvileged comnication that i wil nevereveal to anybody, not tthethics coittee, not to a cou of law, not to ybody." given that tom coburn is an ob/gyn,ot exactly clear in what capacity he might have been treating senator ensign. so not clear why s doctor/patient confidentiality would prlude h from answerg queson about the ensign affair but would alw limbo make lots of statements out the affa that portray himself in a really good light. about the other half that the doctor says he was wearinghen heoueled senatorensign that of a deacon bringing in a religious group appearsto be the nntive tish u linking both. known as the fellowship or family, they run a house known as c street where seto coburn and ensign live together with other lawmakers in washington, d.c. dougamptontalked about c street a itsembers in the se scandal beeen his wife and sen

tiff we went through before about what she knew about torture and didn't and the cia called her untruthfulats are mad about it. they raised the word assassination. look at the evil cia out there secret teams and the rest. they know full well that the cia had full authority after 9/11 to go out and kill people, targeted killing. >> look, i think it's a misuse of the term assassination. killing terrorists is not assassination. killing politically is assassination. but in the "wall street journal," hardly a democratic tool that broke this story on monday. "the new york times" broke the story on sunday. the word assassination was first used by "the wall street journal," not the democrats. >> sir -- >> so you're saying you're blaming the democrats for something "the wall street journal" did and you're saying the democrats put together a political hit operation to make nancy pelosi look better. give me a member of congress that's done that. >> the fact that they wrote a letter saying they were lied to. there was affirmative, you know, disinformation passed from the cia. they provided no evidence

went through before about what she knew about torture and what she didn't and the cia called her untruthfulink they're mad about it. the democrats are mad about it. they raised the word assassination. look at the evil cia is out there, skrement teams and the rest of it, when they know full we will the cia had full authority after 9/11 to go out and kill people, targeted killings. >> well, look, i think it's a misuse of the term assassination. killing terrorists is not assassination. killing leaders is assassination by the definition in any dictionary, but was "the wall street journal," hardly a democratic tool, broke the story on monday. the word assassination was first used by "the wall street journal," not the democrats. sir? so you're accusing the democrats of something "the wall street journal" did and you're saying the democrats have put together a political hit operation to get the cia to make nancy pelosi look better. give me examples of who has done that. give me a member of congress, his or her name, who has done that. >> the fact they wrote a letter saying they were lied to. there

there are untruths, there are misstatements and it's time for it to end. the american people deserve more , the security of our nation deserves more, the people who lost their lives on 9/11, the families who suffered, the emergency workers who suffered, all those people deserve more. and the men and women who write this -- right this moment are in places like iraq and afghanistan , they deserve better. they deserve an honest and up front discussion about energy policy, what it means to our security and that if we don't get it right now then more lives could be lost in the future. mr. boccieri, i'm so glad to be here with you today to talk about these important issues and i know that the people from ohio to new york out to california will be united in knowing that america is a country, we sent a man to the moon, we can deal with energy policy as well. and it's something that i look forward to working with you on. mr. boccieri: i thank the gentleman from new york and he is absolutely correct in his assessment of this. this is a matter of our national securit

you know, the fact is, if they're spreading it untruth about you, that's a problem. if the boss walks by and says, hey, matt isn't here and it's 10:00. well, matt doesn't come in until 11:00, that's appropriate. that's okay. >> when do you brush it off, nicole, and when do you say, okay, now i've got to actually take action here? >> yeah, and i love that question. because that's the problem with bullying. for the most part you just eat it, eat it, eat it, and like they said in the clip, it can result in anxiety, in depression. you don't go to work. your ability to perform is impacted, and as a career expert, your primary career tool is you. and if you don't have confidence, if you don't feel motivated, you are at a loss. and your responsibility is to protect yourself. so enough is enough. >> not to get a lot of parents up in arms here, but when you're young, sometimes you tell a kid who is being bullied, the best way to handle it is to walk right up to the kid and punch him in the nose. and they'll learn quickly. what's the equivalent in a workplace? can you figurati

this is a serious untruth. on page 23 the bill directs f.d.a. to spend its registration fees on food safety activities. the bill explicitly provides that food safety activities include conducting inspections. this money will be diverted from inspection and protection of the american people and will not be available for the activities of food and drug. it might give relief to somebody and it might even be somebody that needs relief. but there's no standards whatsoever given as to who will get the money, how it will be spent, on what and for what purposes. the bill requires the f.d.a. to adhere to a rigorous mandatory inspection schedule based on risk. this bill does nothing to enhance that but takes money away from the protection of the american consumer by having proper inspections at point of entry or inspections in other countries. that is a bad situation and one which is going to seriously hurt the safety of the american public. the bill is carefully crafted to assure that the american food and drug administration will protect american consum

you do not have them come on here and speak these untruths.erguest: first, i work for e merc cato institute at george mason and we are nonpartisan. my facts about the great depression, i get them from reading academic articles, and in particular, reading the work of christina romer, president obama's own chairman of council of economic advisers, and she has shown very effectively that what got us out of the depression was not spending that monetary policy. there is a lot of literature showing that the spending in the war did not get us out of the depression. even paul krugman, the most recent nobel prize winner, has acknowledged spending in the great depression is not what got us out of the depression. so i had actually read a lot of articles. i think i am pretty well informed. as for recovery.gov, the data that you see is not actually tracking the money. there is a competing website called recovery.org, and they are a private business who tracks the money. they have been doing this for 10 years. they had even offered their help to the obama a

john shadegg just talked about the untruth of your being able to keep the health care policy that you currently have is absolutely in this bill. people are not going to be able to keep their health care policy, we know that. we also know without a question that there's going to be a washington bureaucrat put between the doctor and patient. the washington bureaucrat is going to be making your health care decisions, my message to the american people, is going to make your health care decisions. your doctor isn't going to make those decisions. you aren't going to be able to those decisions. your family aren't going to be able to make those decisions. some washington bureaucrat is going to tell the patient what tests they can have, what medicines they can have, surgeries they can have, x-rays they can have and can't have. there are going to be more can't-haves than can haves. right now today when people have insurance provided by their employer, that is a tax-free benefit. we already know that this democratic bill is going to put taxes on your health insurance and you are going to have to