but it is not given to human beings to eliminate, not only all but most untruth. it is not possible and our personal lives. it is not possible in the lives of -- but this is the task of this. you see, history does not deal with justice. history of attempts to deal with the truth, but truth is a very complicated thing. truth is a much deeper and much more complicated thing than justice. and you see, you can in a way do a lot of construction by pursuing injustice is. now when it comes to our life, not only history, the perfect truth is not given to us as kierkegaard said, the perfect truth is given to god alone. what is given to us is the pursuit of truth. and the truth on to be pursued when this is possible and when this is meaningful. intend to be treated kindly by history, because i intend to it? >> let me tell you a little bit about this. presumption, i know a fair talk about a comparison of churchill and hitler. people think that hitler was a great talker, you know, talking to him. this is actually not true. were true on a certain level. and he did this constan

he didn't have to tell an untruth to try to get more votes.hat happened, and i have seen the analysis. that inside him, he was sorry he hadn't served. he's trying to compensate. you start telling something, at fist you tell it right. then you sort of slip in, i tell it a little looser. you tell it looser. then wham, it may have cost him the opportunity to serve. >> donna, you're a democratic strategist, if he came to you and said, what do i do, what would row tell him? >> he apologized. he needs to keep doing that. he needs to get the burden off his back and get back to the real issue. the longer he talks about it, the more tape, voters don't care. they care about their jobs, their health care, their way of life. he has an incredible record of public service. if you can't talk about the issues, voters will remember the mistake. you have to talk about the issues. >> if i were a democratic strategist, i would tell him to get out of the race. >> out? >> out. it's not a year for phonies. people are going to hold this against him. >> they may hold

people caused and perpetrated by people who would so see -- who would tsao seeds of discontent and untruth and dishonesty for political gain. that, mr. speaker, is what's going on in arizona. the law they passed in arizona is a law that mirrors federal immigration law, it directs local law enforcement to enforce immigration lou and it also allows citizens of arizona, gives them standing to sue if local -- if the local government is not enforcing immigration law to the standards defined. i understand that law enforcement thinks they're in a squeeze, may be sued because they're accused of discriminating and on the other hand they may be sued because they weren't discriminating, that may be what we've already heard down there but it's my experience when you bring a law like this, and i've had that experience happen to me at least two times in other circumstances, one is a drug testing law, that brought out people that were aggressively opposed to it, accused it would be setting things up for discrimination based on personalities, race, or any other region, and then when we pissed -- passed th

lobbyists are doing everything they can to distort this provision, spreading misinformation and untruths. mr. president, the suggestion that this provision will force derivatives into the dark without oversight is absolutely force. the dodd-lincoln bill makes it abundantly clear that all swaps activity will be vigorously regulated by the fed, the commodities futures traight commission -- trading commission, and the securities and exchange commission. my good friend from new hampshire, senator gregg, my friend from tennessee, mr. corker, senator corker, wall street lobbyists and others in recent days have somehow argued that by pushing out risky swaps from the nation's largest banks, like j.p. morgan and bank of america, wells fargo, goldman sachs and citigroup, that somehow swaps will no longer be regulated. this is just plain wrong. just because these swap desks will no longer be overseen by the fdic does not mean that they will not be subject for this will's strong regulation -- this bill's strong regulation by the market regulators, the f.t.c. and the cftcn. short, they simply ignore