open section to excerpt the attorney-client and 3 when discussion this open section will unvalidly prejudice the city. how would a discussion in open section in closed session harm the city in both cases they're applying practically over. the real question is whether the commission will support the directors but isn't that would public comments should address and isn't that something that the commissioners should speak to in open session. and shouldn't the advice from the city attorney be in writing and if so where is it. another reason why openly discussed draft reviews by the council should be preferred is because should drafts are commonly rectified openly at boards meetings and board committee meetings and even the planning commission. the draft is openly decided in other settings so why is it different here? sunshine. thank you. >> on my website stop la downsize all one word.com i posted my article sandblasting in march. sunshine ordinance 6712 didn't say that a policy body can delegate to a staff body to pursue litigation which the policy body is required to report out in closed session in an o