the certainty that he actually believed that in every fiber of his being is just about unvoid unavoidable. anything that anybody tells you today, good news is you don't have to believe me, them or us. all of this material is available. it's not like the french and indian war in which i worked briefly where there are six accounts of the battle where i was posted for a while. you can read jackson to your heart's content and you can come to grips with it. i'll be surprised it if when you're done you do not believe that his attitude toward all of this was that it had nothing at all to do with him, he was merely the vessel through which god was doing things for his chosen people of the confederate states of america. while the rest of you contemplate something further, let me make an appeal that i always do when i get on my behind legs in front of people, even people who are not the friends of civil war preservation that you all ought to be. to support the preservation efforts that we're all involved in, the civil with an trust in washington, the central virginia battlefields trust, richmond ba

i am concerned, however, that flaws in the law make consistency in the review process unvoidable. you may have taken care of this one, but it will pop up again, that is because section 550 grants discretion to the secretary to approve security plans, the law says only that the secretary may disapprove a plan that does not meet these standards. i offered a change during the markup that would have changed that word "may "to a "shall." that word may is what causes the problem. and the having to go back and requestion and the time is of the essence when we are talking about homeland security. so, mr. beers, do you agree that site security plans failing to meet the standards should be s disprov disproved? >> our objective is to get the yes. so the notion of disapproval doesn't necessarily accomplish that. the point is when we say we are not prepared to approve it. that is the functional equivalent, but what we want to do is have a kwplan to say a pl nee needs clarification. >> we are tries to get these in. >> i believe it should be a requirement so industry is clear about what they nee