participate because they did not comply with certain aspects of the qualification requirements sometimes unwitingly. the lens we were looking at is how can we make the program more effective, more workable, impose less of a compliance burden on candidates, improve the program in that way without changing really the basic structure of the program, not getting into matching ratios and not funding the candidates can get, etc., but looking at things that were kind of more procedural in nature. kind of the benefits of that approach, for one, initially, there was a hope that this piece could affect the november 2019 election, and a smaller in scope ordinance was able to get through the election, get it to the board of supervisors more digestible, and a committee or board be able to review it, understand it, and be able to act on it quickly. so that's kind of one benefit of that. also, last year when staff were working with members of the board on the acao, the anticorruption and accountability ordinance, we heard from their staff that they would appreciate having much smaller in scope ordinances, this a