you articulated has come to mean so many things to so many people, which is why this net neutrality upate at the fcc stirred such a public reaction. is it fair to say first that this debate seem to be mostly affecting people who already subscribe to home broadband service and they seem to be reluctant for that to change in any way? you spoke to some of the demographics of that. the second thing is, what do you think of the proposal as chairman tom wheeler issued in april? >> i do think the network neutrality debate is mostly about the quality of connection. it talked about with zero rating programs, there is a separate question. maybe we should be thinking about how to stimulate investment in the network and how to make it cheaper to connect those people. demographically, if you look back at the old proceedings from the 2010 order, a huge number of state and local politicians voted. almost overwhelmingly democratic. they said don't do it. 70 house democrats said don't do it. >> you mean reclassification? >> even the 2010 order. if you can't manage, the only way you can maintain is by buil