joining me is uri friedman.ery surrounding that singapore summit. what did north korea actually agree to? and that is the real question mark here, isn't it? >> definitely. the biggest thing that i want to focus on, i think everyone should focus on in assessing whether the summit was a success, is the question of north korea committing to work towards the denuclearization of the korean peninsula. if north korea really wanted to just give up its nuclear weapons, why wouldn't it say that in plain english or korean in the summit? what they said is denuclearization of the korean peninsula. and that definition actually really matters because what they want is is not just, you know, to give up their nuclear weapons in exchange for academic aid or normal relations with the united states. what they swant is a transformation with the united states and if that means that they want to stop the hostile policy towards north korea is potentially withdraw of u.s. forces from the korean peninsula and end to the south korean alli