look at the us china trade wars us europe friendly, as it were, us trade wars, what they have now donesian industries, they have banned the supply of steel there. well, here they banned a lot of our goods, both branded and non-branded, from being supplied to themselves. and we bring it all here. uh on those pistons that we once had the wto more than ten years ago is no longer so active. yes, because if you know certain restrictions almost the same way. yes, i would look at the balance. uh, export import. we almost did not greatly reduce the import of goods, including yes, yes, yes, there is a share, but this is the main stream coming from the west and the duties have remained the same five percent, 10 percent, 15 percent that were once imposed in the house. uh-huh, at the same time, our team is not better and strange. she simply raised the duties to 35. otherwise, they simply removed the whole island and market. and we will still live. under wto rules under this burden. why do you need it? let's reset. let's enter the minimum. mirror duty, under it up to 35%. you see, even one small in

look at the us china trade wars us europe friendly, as it were, us trade wars, what they have now done industries, they have banned the supply of steel there. well, here they banned many of our products, both branded and non-branded, from standing in front of them. and we are all we drag it here, ah, along those pistons that the wto used to give us more than ten years ago is no longer so active. yes, because if you know certain restrictions almost the same way. yes, i would look at the balance. uh, export import. we have not greatly reduced the import of goods, including yes, yes, yes, there is a share, but this is all the main flow comes from the west and the duties have remained the same five percent, 10%, 15, which were once imposed in the house. uh-huh, at the same time, our unfriendly country is better. she simply raised the duties to 35. otherwise, they simply removed the whole industry. and we still live according to wto rules under this burden. why do you need it? let's reset. let's enter the minimum. mirror duties, we will raise to 35%, because that's even one small industry.

look at the us china trade wars us europe is friendly to the us, as it were trade wars, what they haventire russian industries. they stopped deliveries. they became there. they banned many of our products, both branded and branded, constantly for themselves. and we drag it all, according to those guns that were there once more than ten years ago, they are no longer so active. yes, because if certain restrictions. you know almost the same. yes, i would look at the balance. ah, export. we almost did not greatly reduce the import of goods, there is a share, but this is the main flow of the west and the piston remained the same 5%, 10%, 15 that were imposed on us during the wto, while our unfriendly countries are better. they just raised the piston to 35 for us. otherwise, they simply removed it. whole industry from the market. and we live by the rules the wto is under this burden. why do you need it? let's reset. let's enter the minimum. mirror duties, under it up to 35%. you see, even one small industry. leading, there in six countries, five anglo-saxon countries and poland of increased

look at the us china trade wars us europe is friendly, as it were, us trade wars.h entire russian industries, they have banned the supply of steel there. well, there are a lot of them our goods, both branded and non -branded, were forbidden to stand up to you. and we bring it all here. uh, for those pistons that we once had the wto more than ten years ago is no longer so active. yes, because there are certain restrictions. you know almost the same, but now. yes, i would look at the balance. ah, export. we have not greatly reduced the import of goods, including yes, yes, yes, there is a share, well, this is all the main flow comes from the west and the duties have remained the same 5%, 10%, 15 that were once imposed on time, while our unfriendly countries. us they simply raised duties to 35. otherwise, they simply removed an entire industry. and we still live according to wto rules under this burden. why you need it? let's reset. let's enter the minimum. mirror duty, raise up to 35%. after all, here is even one small industry. leading, there are increased duties on

look at the us china trade wars us europe is friendly to the us, as it were trade wars, what they have russian industries. they stopped deliveries. there become. they banned many of our products, both branded and branded, constantly for themselves. and we drag it all, and for those fees that were there once more than ten years ago. we are not so active anymore. yes, because if certain restrictions. you know almost the same. yes, i would look at the balance. ah, export. we didn't cut much. they have goods, there is a share, but this is the west and pistons remained the same 5%, 10%, 15, which were sometimes imposed on the vton , while our unfriendly countries are better. we just raised the piston to 35. and so in general they simply removed the whole industry. and we live according to wto rules under this burden. why you need it? let's reset. let's enter the minimum. mirror duty, under it up to 35%. you see, even one small industry. lead there in six countries to five anglo-saxon countries and in poland increased duties. already the budget will be 4 billion rubles. more this year they c

so it, it tried to do things at a very friendly and live cos why, but the reality use for ivy ation certainly in europe. there are too many airlines and too much competition. and also of course, excellent trying connections and often a good road connections as well. making it very difficult in the sort of small regional market. and often frankly, by the time you got to the airport and done the flying and come back into the center of the city, of course, you often quicker that said, i mean, you're in a tricky water. he's very sure, holy crap, it's much less than long away. in fact, it's the long line. that's really the most unsustainable, but of course, the most necessary in terms of the bang fuel alternatives. it's a complicated topic. now the sundance film festival is underway in the u. s, and one of the more intriguing features is the midnight films category that includes science, fiction horror, and some often bizarre offerings for renewals. is that the festival in park city, utah? the sundance festival is known for edgy dramas and groundbreaking documentaries. but there's no shortage of the creepy

letter with a dash is a sign of nationalism, which turns into europism and so on, in short, something hostile. and this means friendly for us you mean it. taras wozniak, known in ukraine and abroad, cultural scientist and political he was a technician by education, but he found himself in humanitarian science and education. after studying at the lviv polytechnic, he joined the army, there he began to translate the works of world-famous philosophers. after the demo organization, he became an activist of the democratic movement, in particular, he was co-organizer of the strike at the lviv milling machine plant, where he worked at the time, at the same time he organized the issue of self -published cultural literature, later the idea of ​​creating an independent time arose, the first issue of the magazine was published in 1989, its editor and publisher all this time is taras wozniak, the first five issues were produced as photocopies in vilnius, then the edition is transported to lviv, where it was brochured and distributed throughout ukraine. since 1995, the publication has received official registration for a quarter of a ce

friendly in my code. why? but the reality use for ideation, certainly in europe, there are too many airlines and too much competition. and also of course, excellent trying connections and good rob connections as well, making it very difficult in the sort of small regional market and offering, frankly, by the time you got up to the airport and done the flying and come back into the center of the city of course, usually often quicker. that said, i mean, you're in a tricky water. he's very sure, holy crap, it's much less than long away craft. in fact, it's the long line that's really the most unsustainable. but of course, the most necessary in terms of the bang fuel trinity's. it's a complicated topic. 100 charities in human rights organizations have written to the u. k as prime minister that announced the housing of under age asylum seekers in hotels without proper safeguards. it's most of dozens of asylum seeking children of been kidnapped by gangs or trafficked into motor slavery. the children, mostly from albania, had been staying at a seaside hotel, one by the home office, john hall report. what began as a respons

friendly and my cost. why? but the reality used for ideation, certainly in europe, there are too many airlines and the too much competition. and also of course, excellent trying connections and are good right connections as well, making it very difficult in the sort of small regional market or so what is the future for regional airlines given that, but some of them provide a lifeline particularly to islands community should government be subsidizing subsidizing them as, as a vital public service. i doing this not a question that the answer the question is yes. if, if an airliner is sorry, if a community so remote and islands are obviously a very fine example of that, been around who'd public government, public policy reasons why the state, why the government should pipe to keep those things going. but i think is a more generally across europe. we have frankly too many airlines. yes. of course. full full passengers and for the staff i fly they this morning. it's a tragedy. i'm not trying to shy away from that. but as a general comment, we have too many airlines in, in europe and a, and european travellers bette

us, and we've dealt with that by being very transparent. we cover governments, even governments that are friendly towards the u.s. just as tough as we cover the kremlin. >> reporter: radio free europe was created and nurtured by legendary cold warriors, including diplomat george kennan, cia director, alan dulles, and presidents truman, eisenhower, and kennedy. this place, it oozes with history. can you tell me about the driving force, the soul of this place? >> certainly for the journalists, it's a commitment to the truth. we live right now in what some would call a post-truth age, where people increasingly don't even believe in an objective truth, but this was an organization in the 1950s that was founded on the notion that there is an objective truth. >> radio free europe combats the soviet line with 21 transmitters. >> reporter: one truth the broadcasters still struggle with is the fact that they were originally funded by the cia. congress ended that affiliation in 1971 and mandated the radios operate without any u.s. government interference. but that hasn't stopped other governments from interfering with them. the history of radio free europe is filled with cold war intrigue. t

on israel's relationship with friendly arab states and other countries because there has been a wave of condemnation in the arab world and from europe and even from the usght? he in isolation. the prime minister was consulted is that right?— consulted is that right? he was in the reporting _ consulted is that right? he was in the reporting year _ consulted is that right? he was in the reporting year is _ consulted is that right? he was in the reporting year is saying i consulted is that right? he was in the reporting year is saying that l consulted is that right? he was in l the reporting year is saying that he did not oppose this. there were some other reports that he tried to get it to leap at the bottom line is he did not oppose it and later he put out a media statement saying that, it in fact did not change prayer arrangements or other arrangements at the holy sites so he rejected criticism from other countries about this. he was definitely in on this in a according to media reports here, not oppose the decision to go up. here, not oppose the decision to go u -. �* , here, not oppose the decision to go u . _ �* , . ., here, not oppose the decision t