. >> for a month before this happened the administration was up lobbying all of us in congress saying hey, whatever you do, don't move forward on sanctions. i think we'll have a great deal coming up here. candidly they laid sanctions on the table it allowed iran to craft an agreement where they walked away saying the world has recognized us as a nuclear power. that's a huge problem. that is exactly what we were trying to avoid. >> rose: we conclude this evening with an analysis of the agreement with gary seymour, david sanger, ray tacka and gary sick. >> the reason why the iranians are seeking a deal is because the economic pressure of sanctions. and the big question as david said does this taste of sanctions relief make further nuclear concessions more likely or do-- does this modest relief of sanctions make them more able to withstand the status quo and therefore less likely to make nuclear concession. in sex months we'll have a better idea which is correct. >> a analysis of the nuclear agreement with iran. >> funding for charlie rose was provided by the following:. >> rose: and ame

i certainly hope so and we the people need to let our representatives in congress know that we've drawn our line if they betray us in our democracy in such a manner that they would allow this to be fast tracked after all these years of secret negotiations they absolutely have no entitle money to be representing us in congress most of them don't anyway because they're on the payroll of many of these same corporations that are trying to make the sweet deal for themselves and fleece the american people and fleece millions and millions of people around the world rocky we have about a minute left is this a corporate coup d'etat that is there can't it that's a great expression for it because they have taken over now they they've already bought out congress washington's up for the highest bidder but now they're doing all this in secret and having the audacity to say that it should be fast tracked without the public knowing what's going on without any real debate in congress and without any amendments it's absolutely shameful and this obama administration has sold out to the corporate sector as much or more than any of i

congress, the expertise, we didn't really have it in the country. it didn't exist. be honest, guys, we're making it up as we're going on pants.at of our that's true for us in congress, he administration, as well as experts outside commenting. did well. e >> here at the northern trust. t.a.r.p. additions of were short on specifics, as memory served. a relatively brief document with a very large number in it. i have a question, first olitically as approval was contemplated, was this lack of detail one of the reasons why senses was ood difficult. and one of the pivotal moment lsz i think, as we think back on t.a.r.p., it had been intended first to purchase bad assets of investors nd find behind them. then pivoted to being a bank recapitalization tool. what point was that decision made on? on what basis? sure.l, he original bill was three pages but never intented to be a full bill. that was a description of the we needed. that we sent it to authorities and say this is what we need. craft a bill. the interpretation of that in the press was this was the full bill. intended to be the full bill. moved in lightning speed two weeks for the gotority ultimately when we it, whic

the treasury secretary and the fed to the congress to cut they will have to raise their right hand and say if you do not give us this authority, we will be in the great depression. they go up and raise their right hand and say that, and the congress says no. that crisis of confidence triggered by the very act could precipitate the crisis we are trying to prevent. our catalyst was we can only go when we have maximum chance. this was not a grand strategy. it took a lehman types of and. >> it is true. i had just become the chairman and 2007. my republican colleagues forgotten they had run the congress until 2007. two thousand 3, 2000 4 -- i was a minority. tom delay would not consult me. hank talked about this. i do not angle we could do it. here is where we were. there was partisanship. as i did not think we could do it. you have the chairman, a very honest, deeply conservative man. i spent much of 2008 defending hank and been -- ben. they wanted to have hearings. over bear stearns. that was hard enough to get it done. i agreed with them. it was no way that the resolution procedure with intervention that we had in there. ss the government wil

i certainly hope so and we the people need to let our representatives in congress know that we've drawn our line if they betray us and our democracy in such a manner that they would allow this to be fast tracked after all these years of secret negotiations they absolutely have no entitle me to be representing us in congress most of them don't anyway because they're on the payroll of many of these same corporations that are trying to make the sweet deal for themselves and fleece the american people and fleece millions and millions of people around the world. rockey we have about a minute left is this a corporate coup d'etat it is there can't it that's a great expression for it because they have taken over now they've already bought out congress washington's up for the highest bidder but now they're doing all this in secret and having the audacity to say that it should be fast tracked without the public knowing what's going on without any real debate in congress and without any amendments it's absolutely shameful and this obama administration has sold up to the corporate sector as much or more than any of its prior

in congress. i see tom latham who has been working hard. he is one of those guys who's in there fighting every day for the conservative common principles between us, wisconsin, and iowa. i want to thank tom for what he does in congress. send him back. [applause] the hardest working guys we have. i also want to talk about our good friend chuck grassley. we have been seeing a lot of each other recently because we are on the budget committee together. we keep making the same argument and because we keep making the arguments we do not have -- we are not where we need to be right now. chuck and i think the money that comes through the government is not the government's money, it is your money, the taxpayer cost money presented to the government in the first place. money that was's sent to the government in the first place. [applause] i want to thank chuck for all the is done. this is a man who has so much respect among congressional republicans. chuck grassley, i want to thank you for your service. we are indebted to your gratitude. [applause] some people say that presidential campaigns are wrong families. that they are rough, they are ringers. that i

among them, a family of chemicals used in everyday plastics known as phthalates, which congress banned in toys after a study by dr. shanna swan. welcome to 60 minutes on cnbc. i'm lesley stahl. we'll be exploring the world of science in this episode. later we'll bring you morley safer's story about the human genome patents being awarded to biotech companies and the proprietary control they now have over part of who you are. and then my report on a ubiquitous chemical called phthalates, which is in everything from perfume to children's toys, but which may also be causing birth defects. but first, steve kroft's story on the enormous amount of money being spent to treat people as they approach the end of their lives. how much money? well, in 2009, medicare paid $55 billion for doctor and hospital bills for patients as they approached the last two months of life. to give you some perspective, that's more than the budget for the department of homeland security or the department of education. and as we reported in 2009, most of those bills were paid for by the government with few or no quest

i think the main drivers front end sentencing laws are enacted by us in congress. like the proliferation of mandatory sentences. i'm hoping that many including people who voted for those again, now in retrospect realize it was a bad mistake. i'm committed to addressing sentences reform this year, and i'm pleased by the fact that both republicans and democrats have -- are joining in that effort. it is a problem that congress created. it's also a problem that congress can fix and it's high time we do so, and i think public demands we do so. we can do such things as changing the calculation on good time credit. congress intended for the 47 credits. that's a change that i include in the second chance reauthorization act, and i believe senator whitehouse you're going to be doing that. i want to find out about programs that reduce recidivism. i know the interest in the community of senator whitehouse and others. it -- more than any other federal inmates released into our communities what what chance do they have to make it when released? lastly one of the main reasons i w

lawmakers why their home was targeted in the deadly attack this was the first time apple victims of us drone strikes were in congress that apart from the congressman who initiated this briefing i saw only the four other members of congress. it's no secret the us congress generally improves the drone strikes. it's very difficult to expect a sudden change of heart. even though part was when these two victims were appealing to the article the twenty fourth of four tax year the us drone strike left his pakistani family devastated the nine year old girl and her thirteen year old brother nearly escaped death that day their sixty seven years old when the phils let's kill all the vegetables in the garden no longer love blue skies are grey ski grey in for a short period of time the mental tension and see it eases when the sky brightness that draws to an unsold us that the msm arias and moving abroad out of their home in north and sirius died and the father of his family said he looked at the life around here in bc he wished his children to be able to walk the streets not afraid of being bombed at the moment. my mother was ki

that does not mean that the debates in congress are over. what happens in the us congress is up to the united states. however, the right honorable gentleman can be assured that the united states administration are extremely strongly committed to this process. the leadership and persistence of secretary kerry were crucial in bringing about the agreement and the clarity of president obama on the matter is clear. i do not think that we need, at this point, to start looking at the other scenarios that the right honorable gentleman brought in of acting separately from the united states. >> order. i am afraid that we have got through only two questions in five minutes, which by normal standards would be very slow. we need to speed up. we will be led in that important exercise by an immediate past minister of great experience and versatility. >> the wealth of detail that has been offered by my right honorable friend the foreign secretary indicates that this is no casual agreement, but one that has been carefully thought through. i pay tribute to his persistence and that

to comply carefully, but it's also important for us to get the story out on this which is we have of the day that in order to do our job. when congress requires us to write a report to them informing them about how the card act has affected the credit card market whether it may need to be changed or tweaked or updated in some respect, if we don't know anything about the credit card market, we can't possibly do that job in a way that's useful to congress. and when we do things like write significant mortgage rules affecting the trajectory of the single biggest consumer financial market in the world, having the data to both understand what we're doing and then be able to assess its impact over time which may require revisions as we go forward over the next few years is critical to us doing our work in a informed and intelligence way. if -- intelligent way. if we're otherwise shooting in the dark without information, that's not going to be good for anybody. >> so do you think the fears that industry has that you're compiling this massive database that is not secure and that could be used for some deleterious purpose, i don't know exactl

it's on to the campaign in the run up to the reopening of the us congress in january. i'm good security surveillance practices have sped on activists and did not sin like to call a halt to what they see is new patient papacy. it's time to stop the nsa come from seizing in search of mine e mails my g mail blogging my telephone calls i never signed up for this. the us citizenry does not want this and i want the people who see the pups to know that her millions others were thinking the exact same thing meanwhile united nations committee has adopted a resolution to protect the rights to the seat external forces they dance it follows reports that the us eavesdrop on foreign leaders including those who still a gemini with the first time in the framework of the united nations. this resolution on a politically states. did the same rights that people have offline also be protected online with coordinate with sadness tinged ground to limit it to simon russia often leaking information about the nsa surveillance activities. his revelations had won him support base in the us and ab

talking about potentially hammering out a deal about easing sanctions but over in the us we've got hardliners in congress talking about piling on even more sanctions on iran when as we've been reporting the international maritime tribunals is demanding russia release thirty activists from greenpeace and also release the ship well to discuss this legal wrangle. and associate professor at the scandinavian institute of maritime law joining us live from. so this international tribunal for maritime law it's demanding that russia releases the ship and all of these activists does this mean that russia has to abide by this it actually has to do this. yes tribunal today has ruled out that russia has to release their arctic sunrise ship and the crew the activists on board then this means that they have to be released not just from the imprisonment but they also have to be allowed to leave the territory of the russian federation and to return to their homes however the tribunal importantly ruled that the netherlands has first. financial security before the vessel and the crew can be released by russia and will is h

. >> if in fact i could solve all of these problems with us passing laws in congress, then i would do way out is to try and yell and pretend like i can do something by violating our laws, and what i'm proposing is the harder path which they use our democratic processes to achieve the same goal you that want to achieve, but it won't be as easy as just shouting. >> reporter: the civic lesson and the rest of the event ended peacefully moments later. teresa garcia, cbs news, los angeles. >>> straight ahead in "moneywatch," a bad rap. the beastie boys fight a toy company over the use of their song ♪ hungry for the best? it's eb. want to give your family the very best in taste, freshness, and nutrition? it's eb. eggland's best. better taste. better nutrition. better eggs. ♪ hey, that's the last crescent! oh, did you want it? yeah. we'll split it. [ female announcer ] made fresh, so light, buttery and flakey. that's half. that's not half! guys, i have more. thanks, mom. [ female announcer ] do you have enough pillsbury crescents? think they're gifing out? definitely gifing out. look what the

and will put them back on and that works because it's going to be very hard core constituency in the us congress to get on board in the us congress has been filed by the administration. for a tough message on iran and the eu to be credible in its coffers as well be nuanced be targeted in your sink into it and see what you can often on like a light switch to that of the top and cheese. and that assignment is rising on the ac in the foreign ministers of russia citing the broth is now set to be on his way to geneva to take part in his talks. theres intent on things on the court with the philippines this friday killing at least three people in sl is expected to my knees and telecommunication. after the mid point out that if it passes. go to the enticing than its deadly weeks. it's hard to deny those eight the storm slammed into hurricanes with winds of over three hundred kilometers per hour. trading the lead up to six week series. doubling wrote that the minister will take place in the media told when they visit me. papa. we thought it was a tsunami chaos is iron sheets were ripped off streets and t

everybody knows former two-term senator for pennsylvania, used to be in congress. you were one of the leading lights of the republican party running in 2012. you came damn close, sir. let's make some news. (laughter) let's make some news right now. i am -- are you running in 2016? >> i am not -- sure. >> stephen: let's get you sure. let's get you sure, okay? remember, this is how the republican party works. i don't know if now you know how the party works but the last guy standing after the nominee is the next nominee! you know, mccain got it after bush, okay? you were the last guy standing when you lost to -- what was the name of the dude you lost to? i forget his name. kit-katny? you lost to that cat. don't they owe it to you? >> yeah. yeah. i think that's right. >> stephen: all right! all right, damn straight. (cheers and applause) what i liked about your message was that you were speaking from the heart. you were speaking from the sweater vested heart. (laughter) and then -- what is this? oh, no! (cheers and applause) oh, hell yeah! oh, yeah! yeah, we're doing

in august. promising much more willing to negotiate especially with the us and the obama administration is cautiously embrace the opportunity. but the vocal group of hard liners in the us congress led by senator robert menendez has emerged is pushing back begins his latest negotiations. none has essentially doesn't trust the iranians and has introduced a bill in congress to increase sanctions just as negotiations seem to be making progress. the new sanctions would cut iraq's current oil export roughly in half. hernandez argues that the only reason iran is negotiating now is because of the damage sanctions has done and the surest way to force iran into giving up any nuclear aspirations is to pressure them to unilaterally give up their nuclear program to the pressure of more sanctions. the white house and us state department had been pushing back against this call for increased sanctions saying they need room to negotiate while the iranians while they appear to be willing to make changes to install cctv washington. talks on iran's nuclear program has an intensity new stage with corey season will be attached in china has set or posses take things step by step to make possibly comp

in 2008 in january george bush came to us and said we need an economic stimulus because the economy is in trouble. if the partisan response would have been the congress is in trouble, let it go. policing -- pelosi not only agreed that the republicans won't support spending. i'm going to say yes but it will be the most progressive tax cuts we can with earned income tax credits etc.. a fundamental difference between the two parties today given the influence of the tea party on the sense of how much do you sacrifice of your own view to keep the government going? within the republican party and the house today there's a scary ammunition of that commitment. >> at the risk of not making my flight you are solving the presence role in building bridges to the congress. there is a lot that has changed since i wait. >> george bush and i were not pals. i never had a serious conversation with george bush but when he sent paulsen and bernanke up to tell us that things were collapsing we responded and it wasn't based on any schmoozing of george bush. >> i have two more questions than i want to open up to the audience. i'm going to go to you barney on this. >> you a

indeed, fast-track as a way to increase the power of congress in a number of ways, and so i agree with lori wallach there are some dangers to usingfast- track, but in the end, i just don't see congress and even a little bit more transparency as a panacea for solving these problems. this is a larger issue. >> bill watson, we gave you the first word, lori wallach, you've got the last. >> the bottom line of this is we need a new procedure to replace fast-track that gives the public the role and congress the role to make sure what will be binding permanent, global laws do not undermine either a democratic process as making policies at home that we need or that lock us into richer great policies that the current 600 corporate trade advisers are ready to impose on us. we need to have different agreements. the bottom line with tpp as wikileaks just showed, it is very dangerous. it is not about trade. you've got to find out about it and make sure your member of congress maintains their constitutional authority. democracy is messy. but i myself more trust the amerco public, the press, and this congress rather than 600 corporate advisors.

in return they make a simple request to us in congress. certainty. i live in the middle of five farms, beef, dairy, hong, poultry, sheep and goat. and in addition to the crops, and also my state of pennsylvania, agriculture is its number one industry. farmers want certainty for the crop prices uncertainty from oppressive rules and regulations come and certainty that lawmakers will not use them as tools for political gain. crop insurance, for example, gives farmers the certainty in the aftermath of a natural disaster, just as farmers in my district experienced last year with hurricane irene. last week i learned from a local family-owned business back home that is being forced to layoff 18 employees because the slow economy was too much for the company to bear with the strain already felt from hurricane irene's aftermath. it's a staple of northeastern pennsylvania. they had been canning tomatoes, beans and vegetables since 1921, and have employed over 200 people. businesses like theirs are the backbone of american agriculture. these are the businesses t

, nothing in what secretary kerry just said moves us in the direction of preventing iran from developing a nuclear weapon. >> reporter: some in congress are considering new sanctions against iran. something the iranians say would stop the agreement completely. president obama praised the deal and warned congress not to be hasty. >> obama: going forward we'll continue to work closely with congress. however now is not the time to create new sanctions. it would ol only de rail our new direction. >> reporter: years in the making this buys time towards a comprehensive settlement. joining us now from the white house is deputy national security adviser ben rhodes. in the hours after the agreement here's what the new president of iran had to say. the outcome of the negotiations is the 5 plus 1, in other words the world powers have recognized iran's nuclear rights. did the american delegation leaving geneva leaving think that's what it done. >> what we do not recognize is the right to enrich, can we achieve a mutually defined peaceful nuclear program that the united states and the p5+1 can agree to with iran, ensures that program will be for p

are used in a malicious way and all of a sudden they become classified as chemical weapons, very odd statute but it does operate in a way that is inconsistent with the bedrock principle that the congress doesn't have this kind of police power. >> the chemical used here, one of the chemicals listed in the annex to the treaty. >> i don't believe so. is not one that is listed on the three schedules. there are 43 chemicals, neither of these are on their but there is an important difference. perhaps an odd way to think of it but this is a statute that is trying to regulate -- chemical weapons -- with respect to something like weapon is chemicals or sarin gas it makes sense to say those are chemical weapons but with respect to otherwise harmless chemicals the only thing under the government's theory turns them from chemical weapons, isn't a noun, it is over, malicious use and put you in a very odd situation. congress had come in and said there are certain chemicals that by their very nature almost inherently weapon is congress would have a lot more authority to proceed. >> we permit that in all sorts of definitional section of criminal code. we call a dangerous weapon anything that you used

just a lot have to take more confidence building steps and it's very difficult to see the us congress doing it in the current environment peace activists ryan thompson thinks the u s plans to stick to deal even if washington itself comes under pressure. the us is not going to give up on the job we've had a basic old lawyer writer and his nineteen seventy nine and this is a major step toward italy have everybody on board yes they did not turn in reaching a twenty percent that knocking the cutest ever need a weapon year that was probably more the french don't wanna compete with the on the market for medical isotopes. but there's no law to get teased a lot of time putting this and they're not gonna throw it all way because the israelis to have an affair. for some israel's anger that you want a bit too far. the leak that the country only just stopped short of making an explicit threat to attack iran. mr netanyahu reaffirms his tough stance at a news conference really scores on a post player has more on the action we had from the israeli prime minister than a minute and now that he made me face confer

let's be honest, we were making going on theere seat of our pants and that was true for us in congress, the administration as well as who wereutside commenting and for all that, we well.etty >> there's a question right there, sir. tannenbaum, chief economist at the northern trust. editions of t.a.r.p. were relatively short on specifics. amory serves, it was relatively brief document with a large number in it. i have a question, first, as approval was contemplated, was the lack of detail one of the reasons why consensus was difficult? and then one of the pivotal moments i think as we think back t.a.r.p., is that it had been intended first to purchase bad assets out of the banks and find behind them and then it pivoted to being a bank recapitalization tool. at what point that was decision made and on what basis because ended up being very important. >> both points. the original bill was three was neverthat intended to be a full bill. that was a description of the authorities we needed so we sent to congress saying, here are the authorities we need, let's craft a bill. obviously, the inte

in return, they make a simple request to us in congress -- certainty. i live in the middle of five farms. crops,tion to various and also my state of pennsylvania, agriculture is its number one industry. farmers wanted certainty for their crop prices, certainty from rules regulations, and certainty that lawmakers will not use them as tools for political gain. crop insurance, for example, gives farmers certainty in the aftermath of a natural disaster, just as farmers and my district experienced last year with hurricane irene. from a localearned family-owned business back home. it is being forced to layoff 18 the slow because economy was too much for the company to bear with a strain already felt from irene's aftermath. the business is a staple of northeastern pennsylvania. they have been canning tomatoes, beans, and that shovels since 1921 and employ over 200 people. these are thee backbone of american agriculture. these are the businesses that need lawmakers to work together to finalize a long-term farm bill so they can have a little more certainty amongs

just iran have to take more confidence building steps and it's very difficult to see the us congress doing it in the current environment the tigers lentils who thinks the u s plans to stick to the deal though even if all my kids to come under outside pressure. u s is not going to give up on it the joke we've had a basic old lawyer writer and his nineteen seventy nine. and this is a major step toward italy have everybody on board yes they did not turn ughghteen to twenty percent it's probably more the french don't wanna compete with the on the market for medical isotopes. but there's no law to get teased a lot of time putting this and they're not gonna throw it all way because the israelis to have an affair. the summons was on drugs into one of the two father that the country only to stop showed today that making an explicit threat to attack iran. from a study on reaffirmed his tough stance the news come from some of these correspond closely it has more on the reaction that well we had fun the israeli prime minister than a minute and now that in a brief press conference is that humanity is taking

congress has brought authority in the absence of this treaty to protect the rights of the disabled and used that authority there are limits in the system to help congress to go with respect to the regulation of matters normally addressed by state and local governments. because of a supreme court decision, 1920 decision missouri against holland congress is allowed to expand its normal legislative authority when it is passing legislation to implement a treaty. a concern has been raised that congress that any future time could use the disability convention if it is ratified as a basis for new legislation that would intrude in new ways on state and local authority beyond what congress could enact. the united states commitment to federalism depends on maintaining a national government of limited and enumerated powers and i believe this issue should be addressed. it is possible to address this issue with the pro preservation. i look at the reservations proposed by the administration that are not adequate. when you read those reservations closing what you find is they merely stated that the govern

enrichment plans is to directly contradict the tough message that israel and many old allies in the us congress want to uphold israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu had destroyed the previous week the negotiations as it reveals the ocean state israel believes a deal struck in the latest round of talks an answer on a concrete steps to unravel its ongoing u k program. while iran maintains their ambition is to develop nuclear power the islamic republic is suspected of causing or allowing my enriching uranium at the level which could lead to the production of a new tip own serial killer joseph paul franklin has been put to death and misery in the us to its first execution in nearly three years the eighth u s circuit court of appeal said that missouri could carry on with his execution only a block based on users' dispute lethal injection procedures which a lover course it must be results prior to the execution. the white supremacist targeting blacks and in a killing spree from nineteen seventy seven to nineteen eighty and was convicted of seven murders but claimed to have killed twenty people in

when they suspended their voluntary observation of that additional protocol that was viewed in congress and in the us media as oh here they are going at it again so there is a big danger that that the media will sell this as some sort of a final agreement so if nothing happens in six months and they go back to the status quo then it will be an additional. room for additional sanctions on iran and pepe if i go back to you in bangkok israeli prime minister netanyahu says this is a historic mistake but that tells a lot of people that if it's a historic mistake in his opinion it must be a good deal. look at the historic mistake is p.v. himself you know he is the mad dog. sometimes least in the middle east everybody knows that then on a lying movement russia china the bulk of the developing world the only one who does know about this is us public opinion most of it and all busily us corporate media so he's going to be kicking and screaming like a need for the next six months on a daily basis but seriously the grown ups are paying attention russia and china and that this is something that we should develop

it's their malicious use in that puts it yuan an odd situation. if congress had come in and said look there are certain chemicals that by their very nature are almost inherently weaponized congress would have a lot more authority to proceed. >> counsel we permit that in all sorts of definitional sections of the criminal code. we call a dangerous weapon anything that you used to inflict serious injury on someone. i don't think of a car is necessarily a dangerous weapon. it's something i used to transport myself. it's only when i'm using it for a prohibited purpose that it turns itself into a dangerous weapon. so i am having a problem with this noun/herb distinction. why isn't the intentional killing and burning of another human being using chemicals the essence of what this treaty is trying to stop? i thought that's what it was trying to do. we want to add on warlike purposes that the treaty permits exceptions for any peaceful purpose. >> justice sotomayor echo club points. generally you might be right that the criminal law takes objects that are otherwise inn

could get background checks, all these things done that seem like common sense to those of us not in congressose folks on capitol hill had the courage of their contributions to do the right thing. there is no way you could look at the faces of those 20 children and 6 adults. no way you could look in the eyes and the faces of those parents and not do something. >> be yeah. and what a time to have to deal with this, so close to thanksgiving. thank you so much, jonathan capehart. you have written a lot of compelling articles and i appreciate you being here. we'll be right back. [ male announcer ] if you're a rinse user, you may have heard there's a new rinse that talks about protecting, even after eating and drinking. crest pro-health has always done that. and addresses all these other areas as well. rinsing with pro-health after brushing can take your oral health to a new level. now that's the new you need. [ ben ] i felt a difference. right off the bat, my mouth felt cleaner. i know there's been an improvement. i'm not gonna stop using pro-health. i mean, look at these things. [ male announcer

when they suspended their voluntary observation of that additional protocol that was viewed in congress and in the us media as over here they are going at it again so there is a big danger that that the media will sell this as some sort of a final agreement so if nothing happens in six months and they go back to the status quo then it'll be an additional. room for additional sanctions on iran and pepe if i go back to you in bangkok israeli prime minister netanyahu says this is a historic mistake but that tells a lot of people that if it's a historic mistake in his opinion it must be a good deal. look at the historic mistake is a peavy himself you know he is the mad dog. sometimes least in the middle east everybody knows that then on a lying movement russia china the bulk of the developing world the only one who does know about this is us public opinion most of it and all busily us corporate media so he's going to be kicking and screaming like a need for the next six months on a daily basis but seriously the grown ups are paying attention russia and china and that this is something that we should deve

in place to establish accountability. you can ask the question, as congress did in 1968, in which circumstances is it appropriate to use electronic surveillance and which is it not? congress only came up with half a dozen crimes initially, acts that would permit the use of electronic surveillance in the u.s.. over time, that increased dramatically. they started with a very small category. they said there would be public reporting. which courts for more inclined to grant it, who gave extensions. noy said there would be targets after investigations were concluded. you don't want to jeopardize investigations once they're underway. was it has been completed, you should let people know they have been subject to surveillance by their government. you look at the 1968 act and say to your self, this is an elaborate structure of oversight and protection. the aim is not to tie the hands of government investigators, rather to create accountability in what is potentially an unbounded investigative technique. i think we're at the point today which is almost as far on the spectrum from the 1968 act as you can imagine, with the current pfizer au

in congress has declined. >> melissa griffin cane joining us to take a look at who in congress has served in the military, itson congress. kind of a changing of the guard. >> happy veteran's day. dad and brothers are all veterans. in honor of today, i took a look at how many members of congress actually served in the military. the numbers are alarmingly low. here in california, for example,, only 5 out of 53 members of congress actually served in the military. according to the bookings institute, the chart you see there, the number of members of congress who have served in the military, the lowest it's been since world world war ii. in fact, in 1977, a full 77% of the house and the house served in the military. down to about 20% in the senate and the house today. it's very depressing. >> why the decline in numbers? . >> veteran's advocates point to two things generally. they say we have an all volunteer military now. that means there are fewer veterans among us. seven percent of the population are veterans. back in 1970, for example, back 14%. generally fewer veterans. in addition the amount of money it takes

i think it goes without saying that congress has played a huge roll in causing us to be where we are day. everyone acknowledges that. people are concerned, and inhappen to be one that is concerned that we are giving up some le>>. >> david, members of congress who are not the only once that are frustrated and concerned some of america's closest allies the prime minister of israel very vocal in his critcism of these negotiations over the course of the the last several weeks. the saudis are very vocal in opposing what the united states is doing an pursuing this opening with iran. one key point here is the white house, the president has made it clear if those talks fail, if it is discerned or determined that iran is turning that corner from a civilian nuclear program to weapons-grade nuclear material there will be military action. that is the clear implication to stop what iran tries to do if it coles to that. mike thanks for the update. >> there was signs today that sir whsyria's civil war is spilg over. the embassy is located in a headhezbolla strong group. israel backs the group. >> sc