the clintons gave us nafta. one of the worst economic deals in the history of any country. [applause] it's taken our jobs. it's taken our companies. it's taken everything. so much out of our country. and china's entry into the world trade organization, two deals that deindustrialized america, uprooted our industry and stripped detroit and baltimore and the inner cities of north carolina, where we are really focusing, and by the way, you see the new polls coming out, where we're really doing well. which is okay. [cheers and applause] thank you. we're going to win north carolina. i'll tell you. we're going to win florida, too. [applause] actually, we're going to win florida, too. we're going to win ohio. we're going to win iowa. we're winning a lot of states. a little worried back there. the media is saying what's going on over here. you have to see in florida, they have lines four blocks long trying get into the polling booths. they've never seen that. and same thing in many other states that have started. this state has lost nearly half of its manufacturing jobs since bill

if the clintons he gave us nafta. bill clinton signed the worst trade deal in the history of the world. [booing] and the clintons he gave us china's entry into the world trade organization. here in wisconsin, do we love wisconsin? [applause] you know why i'm here. first of all i have a lot of friends here but you know why i'm here. i'm here because everyone is calling me. everyone is calling saying we are going to win wisconsin. [applause] is not so traditional, it's not so traditional for republicans to be in this position. mostly they say we will have to skip wisconsin. not me, we are going to win wisconsin. companies like briggs & stratton who have cut thousands manufacturing jobs and move them where? china. ge health care recently closed its milwaukee location and shift those jobs to mexico. do you know that? that's a lot of jobs they shipped to mexico. jobs shuddered and plants in milwaukee and west allis move the jobs to mexico and move the jobs to china and move the jobs all over the place except for here. the

if the clintons who gave us nafta -- he signed it. remember that. bill clinton signed to the worst trade deal in the history of the world. and the clintons who gave us china's entry into the world trade organization -- here in wisconsin -- do we love wisconsin? you know why i'm here. first of all i have a lot of friends here. you know why i'm here? i'm here because everyone's calling me, everyone's calling, saying we're going to win wisconsin. a tough state. it is difficult for a republican to be in this position. we are going to win wisconsin. companies like briggs & stratton have cut manufacturing jobs and move them where? to china. ge closed its milwaukee location and shipped its jobs to mexico. did you know that, sheriff? that's a lot of jobs. jobs and controls shutters plants in milwaukee. and they move the jobs to mexico and china and moves the jobs all over the place except to hear. the list goes on and on. many, many companies. leaving wisconsin, leaving everywhere. they are leaving our country. we are living through the single greatest job

the clinton's gave us nafta, one of the worst economic deals in the history of any country. [ applauses. it has taken our companies. it has taken everything. so much out of our country. and china's entry into the world trade organization, two deals that truly deindustrialized america, uprooted our industry and stripped bear towns like detroit and baltimore and the inner cities of north carolina. where we are really focusing. by the way, you see the new polls coming out? we're really doing well. [ applause ] which is okay. doing well. thank you. we're going to win north carolina. we're going to win florida. actually, we're going to win florida, too. we're going to win ohio. we're going to win iowa. we're winning a lot of states. getting a little worried back there, the media, what's going on over here. you have to see in florida, they have lines that are four blocks long trying to get into the polling booths. they have never seen that before. same thing in many other states that have started. this state has lost nearly half of its manufacturing jobs since. think of it, half. >> we are m

why does that interest us? nafta was passed in 1993. bill and hillary own that.ed us 200,000 new pr jobs. we've lost 850,000 jobs. we have a cumulative deficit in trade is up to $1 trillion. what does that mean to the people in north carolina? they were at the tip of that spear? they've been devastated. when they hear donald trump say i'm going to repeal nafta, that resonates in places like scranton and fort wayne. >> well, you didn't answer my question so i'm going to assume it doesn't frustrate that he himself put on the table -- >> every time i come on a show, i have one rule. i talk policy. no matter what you say, i will talk policy and i want to encourage you. we're going to have a conversation so you're not just talking. if you want me to talk policy, which is an intelligent thing for me to do, don't you wish your candidate would talk policy? just a gentlemen or no question? >> here's the #trump policy challenge. a hundred bucks to anybody on the set of msnbc can -- >> you should offer to your candidate. >> so you're blaming him. >> he gave his speech. we d

their economists who told us nafta was going to give us 200,000 new jobs. right? what did we do? we lost 850,000 jobs and our deficit with mexico went from zero to $60 billion a year. the peterson institute told us that china going into the wto was going to be a good deal for america. we have lost over 50,000 factories, over 5 million manufacturing jobs. >> in the last 15 years our average median household income has increased by what? zero. and our growth rate has gone from 3.5% which we entertained from 1947-2001, the 1.9%. that is 1.2 million jobs you don't create. you do that for 15 years, you're in trouble. now the peterson institute is telling us that trans-pacific partnership is going to provide us the same kind of goodies for the american people. we are not buying this at the trump campaign. the american people are not buying it and the swing states are not buying it. and e-mails are really revealing about this. this whole thing about how hillary clinton speaks, ok, let's suppose you folks are donors come your corporate donors and on hillary clinton. i'm telling you i am

[laughter] the people opposing us promised that passing nafta and opening markets to china would bring a new era of jobs and prosperity. that didn't happen. instead, they brought only poverty and heart ache and loss. the people opposing us are the same people who we've -- and think of this, who wasted $6 trillion on wars in the middle east. we could have rebuilt our country twice, that have produced more terrorism, more death, more suffering, imagine if that money had been spent right here in our home. we've totally destabilized the middle east, and if you think about it, $6 trillion, and was far better 15 years ago. so we've made it worse. we spent 6 trillion, lost thousands of lives. you could say hundreds of thousands of lives because look at the other side also. lost hundreds of thousands of lives and we're far worse off than we were when we started. who are the people that do this? and then we end the war in such a bad way that a vacuum is formed and we have isis, and that was the jv, the junior varsity but now the jv is violent and vicious and ensconced in 32 different nations, a

one, because it's as close to a straight-up class issue as you ever see in this country, and nafta gives us sort of perfect crystalline understanding of, you know, who our modern-day democrats mean to please, okay? if you go back and look at the debate over nafta in the media, the media was very lopsidedly in favor of it. the professional class generally, professionals and the rich, were very much in favor of nafta, while working people, members of unions were very much opposed to it. it was a straight class divide right down the middle, and it was a -- you know, there was all sorts of, how should we put it, status overtones to it, that it was all about education. if you had gone to college and had gone to economics 101, you knew that trade was a good thing, right? it's like duh, right, of course, and so there was this moment where you had 283 economists signing an open letter to president clinton saying that the treaty would be a net positive for the u.s. both in terms of employment creation and overall economic growth, things like this. it was very common. and here's the -- here's the sor

there because they 1983 told us what, nafta was going to give us 200,000 new jobs. what did we do? we lost 850,000 jobs at our deficit with mexico went from zero to $60 billion a year. the peterson institute fellows that china going into the wto was going to be a good deal for america. we have lost over 50,000 factories, over 5 million manufacturing jobs. the last 15 years our average median household income has increased by what? zero. and our growth rate has gone from 3.5% which we entertained from 1947-2001, the 1.9 present to you this one percentage point of gdp growth. that's 1.2 million jobs you don't create. you do that for 15 years, you're in trouble. now the peterson institute is telling us that trans-pacific partnership is going to provide us the same kind of goodies for the american people. we are not buying this at the trump campaign. the american people are not buying it and the swing states are not buying it. and e-mails are really revealing about this. this will thing about how hillary clinton speaks, okay, let's suppose you folks are donors come your corporate donor

isdscorporateattacks.org, because right now a canadian -- usings ewing nafta nafta to demand $15 million from taxpayers over the xl pipeline cancellation. that canadian company is in u.s. federal court, and that would be the right of a u.s. company if they had a project canceled by the government. but at the same time they are going around the side saying we spent $5 billion on this, but you have to pay us $15 billion because that is what we could have made in the future. host: daniel ikenson, you said if isds becomes a problem, we revisit it later -- how hard is that to do after a trade agreement has been passed? how much tinkering can we do after the fact if we find this to be a problem? guest: i think it would be a consensus around the world, or the united states would find partners in wanted to revisit this if -- right now the biggest selling point of the pro-isds crowd is the u.s. has never lost a case. to me that suggests they are using the wrong statistic. once the united states starts to lose cases, there is going to be upheaval. i think, yes, it is difficult to revisit treaties

<nafta is a challenge for us becaue it would have given some coutnries, specifically mexico, st last year, u-s and mexico created a suspension agreement, designed to keep sugar from entering the country illegally. right quanities, the right quality in the right form, of sugar into our country at the right level> but he says even with the suspension, there are still loopholes allowing sugar to enter the u-s in sub-standard forms, then processing it into other products. < a melthouse can what we call clean it up a little bit, they can reprocss it, typically they liquify it and spray it onto a food product, so they add sugar that way, not going trhougj the normal channels. well this adds pressure to those cane refineries, they are losing a piece of hteir normal business> despite mexico being the u-s sugar industry's number 1 competitor, even those growers don't want to see nafta go away.

<nafta is a challenge for us becaue it would have given some coutnries, specifically mexico, free reign to ship into the united states. > maatz says just last year, u-s and mexico created a suspension agreement, designed to keep sugar from entering the country illegally. despite mexico being the u-s sugar industry's number 1 competitor, even those growers y.

that's when i started to say quoting governor granholm nafta and cafta have given us shasta. like that line. i'm using that on my radio show on monday. i did not quote the statements to embarrass our distinguished opponents tonight, i really didn't. i quoted them to show that we actually share common ground and i think it's important to say that even at a debate. lots of folks in washington complain that we don't have enough bipartisanship and people from different parties can't agree on policies to make the lives of the at average american better but when it comes to this issue of globalization i believe people of good faith on both sides increasingly agree that the current system does not work for blue-collar workers. for years people like governor granholm and secretary reich have warned about the harm that are trade policy is doing to american workers and some of us, some of us on the republican side including people like senator jeff sessions of alabama, have done the same. so we are not asking for protectionism. we are not asking for mercantilism. we are not opposed to

us. especially china, they're grand masters. we will renegotiate naftaand if we don't get the deal we want, we will terminate nafta and get a much better deal. we'll make a much better deal. we are going to lower taxes on american business from 35% to 15%. we are going to massively cut taxes for the middle class. we will unleash american energy, includingle

us. if you look at nafta, that's facti effectively what happened. they wanted to raise the living standards for the rest of the world so we didn't fight as much. today, the message is that we have to help the middle class and the aspirational worker in the united states. that's all he said. >> how does that not create a trade war. >> how could it create a trade war? >> if you is a trade deficit and a budget deficit, it's two different things. >> nafta, 24 years, it's never once been reviewed. mr. trump meets with the mexican people and says we have to review it. we haven't reviewed it in 24 years. it's uneven to the united states. we have to make it fairer, certainly we want free trade. but we just want the trade to be fairer to the american worker. how is that a bad message? secretary clinton is actually championing that message now by renouncing tpp. prior to that, she said it was the gold standard. >> she said it was the gold standard until she saw the final draft. >> what is she taking issue with? the unevenness of the trades. i understand why t

nothing you can do to compensate for the fact we can pay $1.57 per hour that is when i said nafta has given us the shaft. i will use that on radio show on monday. but i will be clear i did not use the statements to a barris our opponent but to show that we share common ground and it is important even add a debate because even those in washington complained we don't haveve enough bipartisanship people from different parties cannot agree on policy to make lives of average americans better. but with globalization people of good faith on both sides agree the current system does not work for the blue-collar workers. so for years governor gran home has warned about the trade policies for the american workers and some of us including senator sessions have done the same. we are not asking for protectionism or trade. we are simply asking for some -- system where workers and businesses have a better chance to compete better to grow and expand and seek higher wages. it is the largest and most attractive market and the world and we should not be forced in united states to enter a deal that puts our people

that's when i started to say quoting governor granholm nafta and cafta have given us shasta. i like that line. i'm using that on my radio show on monday. i did not quote the statements to embarrass our distinguished opponents tonight, i really didn't. i quoted them to show that we actually share common ground and i think it's important to say that even at a debate. lots of folks in washington complain that we don't have enough bipartisanship and people from different parties can't agree on policies to make the lives of the at average american better but when it comes to this issue of globalization i believe people of good faith on both sides increasingly agree that the current system does not work for blue-collar workers. for years people like governor granholm and secretary reich have warned about the harm that are trade policy is doing to american workers and some of us, some of us on the republican side including people like senator jeff sessions of alabama, have done the same. so we are not asking for protectionism. we are not asking for mercantilism. we are not opposed t

toald trump's plan renegotiate nafta, stop foreign nations from cheating us, cut taxes to reopen factoriesdonald trump knows business. and he will fight for the american worker. i would like you to talk about the logic behind these ads and how they fit into the campaign strategies for these last three weeks of the campaign. talking in ang, positive way, i think she will try to do that tonight and in the closing days of the campaign. as for trump, i have heard republicans on social media, saying it has been on the air since the summer. i think at this point, based on the polling data, everything could go right for donald trump tonight and i'm not sure he could close the gap. he has fallen behind into many states. he doesn't have the resources or the discipline to close as strong as he would need to. that ad, while good, the fact that it is running in only three states, it is not good. things, oneare two is consistent with what we said yesterday. that message would have been great for him if he had been hammering it since april and may. secondly, we know in this environment, this free media

clintons sending our jobs to other countries here donald trump's plan, renegotiate nafta, stop foreign countries from cheating usfactories, donald trump knows business and will fight for the american worker. >> talking about the logic mind the ads, the political logic and how it fits into the campaign strategy. clinton wants to be more of lifting. hasn't that athy beyond the air since the summer? that is his winning message, if he has one. taste on the data, everything can go right for donald trump. i'm not sure if you get close the gap. he is falling behind in many states. he doesn't have the resources or discipline just closer strong as he would need to. it is only running in 3 states. things, oneportant is what we said yesterday about donald trump's ethics message. another one that would have been great since april and may. we know that in this media environment that exists for presidential campaign, any individual ad that comes out this late, they are in the way. that is true for the clinton ad , too. they now believe she will win and she has to talk it a positive and uplifting way to make it possible for he

nafta was a disaster. by is what the trade deals have given us in the past. seems like a tool to lever the wages down in the country. i am not for any trade deal. thanks. host: it talk about nafta in duluth, minnesota. how does it impact you? caller: i watched a lot of the things happen, a lot of jobs go overseas. host: what is your industry? what industry are you when? -- are you in? caller: ice to work for georgia-pacific. -- i used to work for georgia-pacific. over thes taken industry because they do not -- i cannot really think, but it's just -- there is a lot of reasons why we need to and try note deals to get hurt in the process. minnesota.duluth, we talking about trade, trade deals. do trade deals help or hurt the u.s. economy? maryland.t oxon hill, good morning. caller: good morning and thanks for taking my call. overall trade deals help the economy. basically there are always going to be winners and losers, but we cannot isolate ourselves from the rest of the world. we pretty much have to trade. we have to put ourselves in the position to be competit

donald trump's plan, renegotiate nafta, stop foreign countries from cheating us, reopening factoriesxes -- donald trump knows business and will fight for the american worker. john: mark, i would like you to talk about the political logic behind these ads and how they fit into the campaign strategy. clinton wants to be more uplifting, talk in a positive way. i think she will try to do that tonight in the closing days of the campaign. the trump ad, why hasn't that at -- at been on the air since the summer? that is his winning message, if he has one. at this point based on the private polling data i have seen from both parties everything can trumpight for donald tonight and the rest of the way, and i'm not sure if you get -- can close the gap. he is falling behind in many states. he doesn't have the resources or discipline to close as strong as he would need to. that ad, while good, it's only running in 3 states. campaign malpractice. john: two important things, one is what we said yesterday about donald trump's ethics message. another one that would have been great since april and may.

this the clinton apology tour citing the former presence of part of nafta losing reduction jobs here and elsewhere, dave nethers will join us later on. >> a group of local pastors gather on the side denouncing the cleveland police patrol mount union for endorsing donal >> are asking that cleveland police patrolmen's association president steve loomis stop thi at a time that we are trying ou best to heal the city.. >> they said today that police sensitivity should be more of a concern to bring the city together and then dividing,ri police patrol mount union voted friday to endorse tromp with 21 votes over democratic presidential nominee hillary are questions about problems withab surveillance cameras. >> the ones that you see on pau set up to detect you. they're asking the same questions as the it spending hours today grilling those in charge of the security cameras what about breakdowns? i team showed a security camera left focused on a patch of payment crimes were out of service public safety committee held a hearingaf to review maintenance contract for those cameras have about 130 cameras and councilmembers wanted specifi

them to rise to our level of affluence and prosperity, not drag us down to their level of poverty and deprivation. mills: i agree. nafta was something that should have had a sunset or a view period, it has not worked out. bill clinton signed that into law, it should never have become law. i am opposed but we cannot hermetically seal our economy inside our borders. potential of our customers are outside the united states. what we need to do is get somessive and negotiate really tough trade deals to make sure that our trading partners cannot cheat. they cannot dump products onto the market and manipulate their. they have to respect our intellectual property. and furthermore we have to stop farming our national sovereignty out to the world trade organization or to an appendage of the u.n.. we need a u.s. based trade remedy authority that is staffed by united states citizens to make sure that if there is cheating or dumping, that we are able to snap countervailing terrorists in place a must meet lee. we do not have to have an endless series of hearings. we need to take control of our national sovereignty but negotiate extr

nafta,s plan renegotiate stop foreign nations and cheating us, cut taxes to reopen factories.knows business and he will fight for the american worker. market would like you to talk about the logic behind these ads and how they fit into the campaign strategy for the last weeks. mark: clinton wants to be more uplifting in a positive way and eventual tried to do that tonight and certainly in the closing days of the campaign. that trump add, i can't stay how many republicans of torment social media, that is his wing meshes -- winning message. everything could go right for donald trump tonight and the rest of the way. i'm not sure he could close the app. he has fallen behind into many states. he doesn't have the resources, or the discipline to hold strong if you would need to. that ad, while good, effectively running interest -- it is only running in three states is bad. john: what we said yesterday , and another-- message that would be good if he was hammering its april and may. in this environment, any individual had in a presidential general election that comes up is late, these

>> nafta, it was, i think, something that many of us considered to have been a mistake. including, i think hillary clinton. there is no way that a president hillary clinton can set in the oval office and say all hand on board we're going full speed ahead on tpp not after the primary campaign and not after the general election. >> congressman, can you trust her word and what she said? >> well, i think -- look, one of the things that hurt donald trump was the fact he would say something and we could show -- or the media would show just the opposite of what he had just said because there was video footage. and i think. >> yeah. >> the same thing would be true if hillary clinton said once she is sworn in as president if that should happen on 8th of november i'm for tpp you'd have all kinds of problems in this country. >> well, you are right about that. congressman, always a pleasure, sir, thank you for taking the time. all right, congressman cleaver. >>> you know what they want to do, they are looking at the possibility of finding a substitute for donald trump. good luck. yo

trump would start us into a trade war. he would undo nafta, and, of course, china -- mexico and canada are very big trading partners of ours. countries in the pacific rim would tilt away from us and look more to china, which would benefit china. and perhaps donald trump, who is in debt to the communist chinese bank would find that to be actually a good thing, and he could make his ties there happily after he takes office and make more money through his connections to china. >> we do understand that donald trump and a lot of folks in ohio are looking at donald trump, may not even know that he built his buildings with chinese steel rather than american steel from places like ohio. >> that's right. >> and so -- >> there's another -- >> go on. >> there's another big impact he would have. in 2013, the median wage in this country, half make more, half make less, went up. it went up by three times as much in 2014 and more than tripled again in 2015. so we have suddenly had wage growth in this country since two things happened. the obama care program

clinton why she did not accomplish certain goals, when they talked about nafta, other trade deals, jobs, and the economy. hillary clinton used her response to mock donald trump's experience by comparing it to her own. >> she's been doing this for 30 years. why the hell didn't do you it over the last 15, 20 years? were you very much involved. excuse me. my turn. you were very much involved in every aspect of this country, very much. and do you have experience. i say the one thing you have over me is experience bus it is bad experience. >> back in the 19 70s i worked for the children's funds and i was taking on discrimination against african-american kids in schools. he was getting sued by the justice department for racial discrimination in his apartment building. in the 1980s, i was working to reform the schools in arkansas. he was borrowing $14 million from his father to start his businesses. in the 1990's, i went to beijing. and i said women's rights are human right. he insult add former miss universe, alicia, called her an eating machine. >> the clock will look at some shout out. remember in the first debate when donald tr

i am a uaw member involved in nafta where the clintons sold us out and told us they were not going to do it. when you listen, hillary clinton has lied. gotten american people killed. done everything to destroy this country. her, theyto vote for have to be against the united states of america. shek lives matter, which supports. if i am a white person and i say white people only, that is racist. black people say, black lives only, that is not racist. when they support black lives only it is a racist black hate group trying to destroy america. putting people in office that have been doing everything against us. donald trump will turn this country around for the better for americans. host: let's go to anita in california. caller: hello. host: you are on. caller: i am a lifelong republican. i will be voting for hillary clinton. donald trump is embarrassing. i cannot imagine that family being in the white house. i've never seen an election where in a primary a candidate talked about the size of his personal private parts. or tweeted a tweet that said people should look at a sex tape . peopl

of jobs in central new york and making sure the trade bill does not continue to ruin us, like it has with the nafta deal with the manufacturing jobs. i have a proven track record. with my opponent, you have some possibilities, but you have with me a proven track record. my question to you is why change that? geoff: we just heard an indictment of your resume. what's your response? ms. deacon: i don't now how he quantifies what he is saying. i have gotten a lot accomplished in this district. if you want to talk about legislation, i was not in congress. i was never a federal congressperson from this district. so for him to say i have not , gotten anything done is just completely false. i mean, like i said i have , worked on the ground. i worked with fema when a school district had an issue with relocating a school and fema not allowing them to build a new -- in a new location. i will with fema to get them the waivers they needed so they could rebuild after a flood. i worked with the city of syracuse to make sure they had the funding they needed for the lead paint issue in the 24th district. i have bee

nafta. but he could use legislation clinton signed into effect where he says, you are being hostile, mexico,o we put tariffs on you. that would shut down manufacturers in the united states. that would shut down major retailers, doing the same to china, and raise prices rapidly. there could be massive economic things. but what would people let him do? how fast could he do it? we do not know. francine: this is insiders telling us that he does not really have a transition play, which is a little bit like the brexit for the uk. if you have a political vacuum for one or two months, what does that mean? usually, presidents on either side of politics have people in place to keep it smooth. diana: even during 2008, it is one thing hank paulson commented about. it was horrible to go through the transition. things were happening so quickly, you could not coordinate policy between two administrations. in the uk, you had a plan b, with mark carney saying, we did nothing brexit was going to happen, but we had planned a stopgap. we do not have that in the u.s. fed. we do not have an ability to deal with t

us. a trump administration will stop another disaster which will come about if i'm not president. the trans-pacific partnership. renegotiate naftad we are going to stand up to china on its currency manipulation, and i've done so much business with china. we're going to be fine with china. problem with china, they have no respect for our country. they have no respect for our president. they'll respect us again. in the meantime, they're building a massive fortress in the middle of the south china sea so they take our money, they take our jobs, they make everything for us. we bring it in no tax, no nothing and yet it's almost impossible for us to do business over there. i don't know if you know, it's not a -- this big boy with the cowboy hat, right? nah. big, good looking guy. and i like him. you know why? he's a serious supporter, right? my guy. but it's like a one-way street, whether it's china, mexico, it's just, boom, everything goes in. they get everything, we get nothing. we get unemployment. we get clothes factories. it's so easy. it's so easy because your politicians have never told you what to do. when they leave and they

nafta and getting rid of tpp? >> yes. i know you're trying to make us look stupid, right?oing a story about what policies people are attracted to. >> reporter: i thought we were having a nice discussion actually. this man may have prompted that by recording every every move, and accusing us of asking gotcha questions and he was angry that we weren't wearing cnn t-shirts. >> reporter: he made sure to tell everyone we were cnn until it back fired with this woman. >> oh, i love cnn. >> thank you. what do you like about donald trump? >> i like that he's pro-life and that he's for americans. there's still some gray areas i don't understand and i want him to flesh that out a little bit more. >> reporter: immigration is a huge draw for this voter. >> when we look at his immigration policy, what are you saying is extreme vetting? now that does not mean religious vetting. that means extreme vetting. i want policies in place to make sure we're doing what is safe. >> reporter: we found many that could not name a single policy donald trump stands for. what policies do you like of his?

it's not going to be trump lays out a detailed plan to get rid of nafta and bring back the working class in ohio. >> okay. sunlen is with us. go ahead ron. >> real quick. there are moments in this speech as there are in the debate where you can almost run the counter factual reality version of the campaign. if donald trump was able to run as an outsider business guy and protectionism to shape up the political system for many average americans without the racial things, which was the original sin of the campaign, which made it tough for him to build support in white collar white american, which is why he's stuck in the low 40s. this speech was the full monte of the blue collar populism that he wants to transform the republican party into a worker's party. there are a lot of parts of this agenda that are going to ring hollow not far from the speech in the suburbs of philadelphia, which is heart break hill for him. >> the trump campaign was calling it a closing argument. sunlen, you were there in the room. we could hear a number of supporters were there and excited about what he was saying. closing arguments, while it may mea

nafta because they let it go. donald trump wants to say let's take a look. has this been working for us? is this good for american workers or not? if you look at towns that have been hollowed out in pence jane, ohio and throughout the midwest, the american jobs have been exported overseas. david: you suggest it might be in the state department or others people say the commerce department. both of those institutions are too big already. >> i don't think it's about creating a bureaucracy. i think what donald trump is all about is making sure there is powerful business leaders who have decades of experience negotiating deals. they will come, take fay cuts, go to work for the government, and start again. david: he's talking about something that doesn't exist. so by definition you are adding to it instead of subtracting from it. >> not necessarily. you can reallocate from one part of a department to another. i don't think he's talking about adding hundreds of thousands of employees. i think he's talking about bringing in a few select individuals to focus like a laser beam to protect america's

the nafta deal signed by her husband is one of the worst deals ever made of any kind signed by anybody. >> donald knows a lot about this, he used undocumented labor to build the trump tower. >> we're going to secure the border and once the border is secured at a later date we'll make a determination as to the rest. but we have some bad out. >> the term "bad hombres" trending on twitter, apparently a lot of people found it offensive a lot of people might not understand the connotation of that. so i'm going to lay it out there. this is not political, this is not partisan, this has nothithi to do with anybody running for office, it's the word and the way it was used. it was derogatory, it was every time he talks. >> you are the one that's unfit. >> reporter: trump tried to use leaked e-mails from clinton's campaign manager against her. >> john podesta said you have terrible instincts. bernie sanders said you have bad judgment. i agree with both. >> you should ask bernie sanders who he's supporting for president, and he has said -- >> which is a big mistake. >> he's campaigned for me around the country saying you're the most danger

nafta. they can't get any worse than that. signed by bill clinton. all of usere in this massive room tonight can prevent this from happening. tpp and we will stop can and the fact of american jobs and prosperity. -- theft of american jobs and prosperity. one man -- we have to do it. it is time. it is time we bring our country back. it is time we act like intelligent people. it is time we don't let mexico and all these other countries take our jobs and that is what they are doing. you look here, the miners. we are going to protect our miners. we are going to protect our steelworkers. we are going to protect our factories and our manufacturers. [cheers] man -- i'm not a big fan. one man they knew the dangers and the dangers of tpp was bernie sanders. crazy bernie. [laughter] he was right about one thing. only one thing, and that was trade. he was right about it because he knew we were getting ripped off but he wouldn't be able to do anything about it. we are going to do a lot about it. we will have the highways running the opposite direction. we will have a lot