and it is likely that the state force, former member of the us national security council, thomas rita, the political scientist petersweiser, also mentions other cia sabotage, for example, the explosion at the arzamas station of the gorky railway, which thundered on june 18 in 1988, the planted explosives detonated, almost 100 people died that western special services could be involved in man-made disasters. the soviet leadership, then not said the soviet authorities did not disclose the details of the tragedy. the soviet leadership of that time is gorbachev, this is new political thinking, as he said. this is a course of friendship with the united states. it was beneficial for them to hide these facts in order to confirm their position of peaceful coexistence, by the way, the cia was already convicted of involvement in attacks on infrastructure facilities of the soviet union even before the eighties. the americans and the british were actively engaged in sabotage activities. uh tried to influence life in the soviet union in that including with the help of this kind of activity, one ca

by turning off the reactors, which was recently proposed by the representative of the us national security counciljohn kirby. the fact that during the operation of the reactor a lot of fission fragments are produced, datse the reaction can be stopped in a few seconds. simply by lowering the control rods into the reactor, but it is physically impossible to interrupt the radioactive decay of fission fragments, respectively, the heat release will continue regardless of whether we shut down the reactor or not, at the beginning i will remind you of the principle of operation of a nuclear reactor inside it circulates water, purified from impurities launch of the reactor occurs when rods are removed from its core, absorbing neutrons. during a chain reaction. we release a large amount of thermal energy, circulating in the reactor core and washing the fuel elements with water, under a pressure of about 16 mpa, it heats up to 320 °. then, passing along the first circuit. it gives off heat to the second circuit, and then everything, as in a normal test, the water turns into vapor and it is at great speed. it

ukraine in the next few days, john kirby, strategic communications coordinator of the us national security council, said that he did not say exactly what the next tranche of aid would include, but he assured that washington is in constant contact with kyiv in order to provide the ukrainian military with the necessary capabilities . were surprised in the united states by the speed and effectiveness of the ukrainian counteroffensive, the pentagon spokesman petrahedron answered this question at the beginning of the russian invasion of ukraine, we saw that the ukrainians demonstrate an extraordinary ability to adapt to use their war-fighting capabilities as quickly as possible, so we were not surprised that they pushed back the enemy so quickly, they also demonstrated an extraordinary ability to use the opportunities that appear on the battlefield and the current contour offensive near kharkiv is no exception, i will remind you if anyone was surprised if look at the reaction of the russian military. it was probably the russians, military aid is only one of the factors that helped the ukrainians to car

the memoir, promising an insider story of the cold war from someone who served on the us national security councila detailed description of a plan to sabotage the soviet economy developed in the eighties under president reagan one of the points regarding violations of gas supplies to western european countries and, accordingly, foreign exchange earnings in the ussr, the cia operation is described as exemplary, which led to an accident on a gas pipeline in siberia. according to a laudatory report by a former american intelligence officer. it was the most powerful of the non-nuclear explosions and the largest fire observed from space. in general, this quote is already enough to appreciate. degree of cynicism, but there were other examples of sabotage that will lead to anastasia ivanova the americans systematically western intelligence officers tried to undermine our country and acted in their favorite way by proxy, recruited citizens of the soviet union to use them to carry out, including energy sabotage , the man-made disaster of 1882 in siberia. at that time, with a non-nuclear explosion in his bo

intentions actually analyzed by fiona hill, she was in charge of russia and europe in the us national security council now heads the foreign policy program of the american research institute brooking, we see a whole series of options that putin has at his disposal and that he is already using, for example , attacks on power plants in an attempt to cut off electricity for the population and in the hope that this will lead to a wider intimidation of ukraine. therefore, we can expect more such strikes on civil centers and civil infrastructure and of course there are various other ways of undermining what is believed to be the reason for ukraine's success, and this is not only bravery ukrainian troops and the supply of weapons that they receive from the united states and some european countries, therefore, we can expect more attacks on ammunition depots, warehouses of weapons and military equipment. in an effort to weaken support for ukraine. so, at this stage, different efforts should be expected from the russians on many fronts. putin is a person who always knows that during operations there will be fai

even by turning off the reactors, which was recently proposed by representatives of the us national security counciljohn kirby. the fact is that a lot of fission fragments are produced during the operation of the reactor, yes the reaction can be stopped in a few seconds. simply by lowering the control rods into the reactor, but it is physically impossible to interrupt the radioactive decay of fission fragments, respectively, the release of heat will continue regardless of whether we shut down the reactor or not, at the beginning let me remind you the principle of operation of a nuclear reactor, water circulates inside it, purified from impurities, the reactor is launched when rods that absorb neutrons are removed from its core. during a chain reaction. we release a large amount of thermal energy, circulating in the reactor core and washing the fuel elements with water, under a pressure of about 16 mpa, it heats up to 320 °. then, passing along the first circuit. it gives off heat to the second circuit, and then just like in a normal test, the water turns into vapor and it is at a great speed. it rot

already in the next few days, john kirby, the strategic communications coordinator of the us national security council, what exactly the next tranche of aid will include, he did not say, however,

to show you with tweets by jo, by the and that was posted yesterday in a quote by the us national security council coordinated on kirby today. let's take a quick lesson. for most of the last century, we led the world because we invested in ourselves. somewhere along the way, we took our foot off the pedal in china and the rest of the world started catching up. not any more. my economic plan is building a better america message to china. now is not the time to do business with putin as usual. how do you read them to the tone being set here by the president? so let me just conclude what he said. john and the rest of the world started catching up. not anymore to me, that's a very uniform big. if not brace the statement. what is it supposed to mean that only the americans entitled to some sort of living standards that the rest of the world has no right to to be catching it? i mean, how else would you interpret that given again, that the united states has accumulated enormous death? it is already living at the expense of the rest of the world. it has degraded the college of this planet, the west, still

want to show you with tweets by joe, by then that was posted yesterday in a quote by the us national security council coordinator john kirby. today, let's take a quick lesson. for most of the last century, we led the world because we invested in ourselves somewhere along the way. we took our foot off the pedal in china and the rest of the world started catching up. not any more. my economic plan is building a better america message to china. now is not the time to do business with putin as usual. what do you, how do you read and the tone being set here by the president. so let me just conclude what he said, john and the rest of the world started catching up. not anymore. to me, that's very is uniform big if not racist statement. what is it supposed to mean that only the americans are entitled to some sort of living standards that the rest of the world has? no right to, to be catching up. i mean, if you actually think about it it's, it's not only dead demagogic, it's, it's actually extremely unfair because again, we know that western block is by far the most responsible for the ecological degradation

and there are probably some serious ones here. state power former member of the us national security councilmas reith and political scientist petershveytsar also mention other cia sabotage, for example, the explosion at the arzamas station of the gorky railway, which thundered in june 1800 in 1988, detonated explosives almost 100 people died that western intelligence agencies could be involved in man-made disasters. the soviet leadership, at that time, did not say the ussr authorities did not disclose the details of the tragedy. the soviet leadership of that time is gorbachev, this is new political thinking, as he said. this is a course of friendship with the united states. it was beneficial for them to hide these facts in order to confirm their position of peaceful coexistence. by the way, the cia has already been convicted of involvement in attacks on infrastructure facilities of the soviet union even before eighties. the americans and the british were actively engaged in sabotage activities. uh, they tried to influence life in the soviet union, including with the help of this kind of acti

down reactors will not reduce security risks, which john kirby , a representative of the us national security councilted doing. many fission fragments, da tse the reaction can be stopped in a few seconds. just by lowering the control rods into the reactor, but interrupt radioactive decay of fission fragments is physically impossible, respectively, the release of heat will continue regardless of whether we shut down the reactor or not, at the beginning, let me remind you the principle of operation of a nuclear reactor, water circulates inside it, purified from impurities, the reactor is launched when the rods are removed from its core, absorbing neutrons. during a chain reaction. we release a large amount of thermal energy by circulating in the reactor core and washing the fuel elements with water, at a pressure of about 16 mpa is heated up to 320°. then, passing along the first circuit. it gives off heat to the second circuit, and then everything, as in a normal test, the water turns into vapor and it is at great speed. it rotates a turbine, which in turn sets in motion an electric generator that pro

s. president on russia during the clinton administration and a former star for the us national security council. welcome to the program. so is it fair to say that the population of the soviet union were initially supportive of the changes that gorbachev introduced? absolutely, they were supportive and they, they knew that the soviet system wasn't working on the leadership, just had refused to acknowledge that. so they were supportive of the changes they were able to travel. they were able to read books. they were on i, i'm able to know their own history. but what gorbachev couldn't do is he couldn't deliver and he didn't have enough time to deliver because the main problems came under president yeltsin when people were really destitute, the economy didn't work. and of course luck always plays a role here. the price of oil was very, very low. contrast to today under president. and what is fatima putins view of gorbachev legacy? do you think? well, i don't think he is. i'm going to acknowledge that the changes, garbage i've made were positive ones opening up the system and talking about the past,

the foreign ministry had non-contact informal contacts, through our security council, the us nationaly councils are limited channels, but they are understandable and if there is a practical task. and if the parties understand how they solve this problem, they both improve their security then everything will work out. if the parties believe that what they have now is enough for them, that the escalation suits them, then, uh, we will continue to see the situation. uh, lack of communication. well, because when you play the game from your point of view, why do you communicate? everything is fine, when the last question, probably, here, returning to the topic of signals, and the resumption of nuclear tests. it may be a signal, after all, it demonstrates determination. well, on the one hand, of course, it’s probably spectacular, although for in order to achieve absolutely spectacularity, one will have to withdraw from the moscow treaty of the sixty- third year. for three media, testing is already called on the surface or in the atmosphere. it's under the camera. now it can be done well, but

use case. the united nations security council is saying that russian threats to use nuclear weapons is a form of black male. you called for russia to be isolated from moscow to be excluded from the old international institutions. and the united states is reacting now for your briefing today. thank you. president zalinski for your statement colleagues. a little more than 7 months ago. just 7 months. we met at night in this chamber to discuss how we could preserve peace in ukraine. at that moment. putin chose war instead, the timing could not be clearer. putin was showing exactly what he thought of this council last week, leaders from more than a 100 countries from around the world gathered in new york to reaffirm their commitment to the un charter and many of the key principles. it stands for sovereignty territorial integrity and peace and security. instead of attending high level weak, pohden announced a renewed conscription effort in russia and instructed areas under russia's military control to prepare for illegitimate snap referenda. he did send him and said emissary who threatened the use of

us speak plainly. nations security council invaded its neighbor. attempted to erase the sovereign state from the map. russia hasegawa shamelessly violated the core tenets of the united nations charter. no more important than the clear prohibition against countries taking the territory of their neighbor by force. again, just today, president putin has made overt nuclear threats against europe, and a reckless disregard for the responsibilities of a nonproliferation regime. now, russia's calling up more soldiers to join the fight and the kremlin is organizing a sham referenda to try to annex parts of ukraine and extremely -- an extremely significant violation of the u.n. charter. this world should see these outrageous acts for what they are. putin claims he had to act because russia was threatened. but no one threatened russia. and no one other than russia sought conflict. in fact, we warned it was coming. when many of you worked to try to avert t putin's own words make his true purpose unmistakable. just before he invaded, putin asserted, i quote, ukraine was created by russia and never had, quote, rea

why because there is a concept of mutually assured destruction in the regulations of the us national security councils defined in 15% of the united states population states multiply 45 million expressions. he pointed out that the density of the population of the eastern part of the coast and the western part is also such that the hall from one submarine provides the very unacceptable damage to the fucking united states on this and there is an absolutely small probability of being used, because there is more. the system about which the dead hand talked a lot about the fact that even if it is very bad for us, then there is also nothing known anecdote, which you know there will be such a struggle for peace that not stones will be left on stones, but this is not about that colleague. putin said that the national security of the state, but it is provided not only by military means. and we have achieved a lot. i have already said a lot here many times, so that european countries think about the national security of europe. this is a process already launched today, and after 3 days in italy, and yes, and al

america, was formulated under president ronald reagan, even recorded in the documents of the us national security council accepted in november 1982 the arrival of a hunchback with his romantic attitude towards the west was perceived by the united states as a chance not for friendship, but for the destruction of the ussr. here is how one of the authors of this strategy now, living roger robinson, senior director for international economic affairs at the the reagan administration 's national security decision directive number 66 describes the economic and financial aspects of destroying the soviet union directive on national security decisions number 75 described the general money in relation to the soviet union the document included measures to build up military power the main goals to limit the ability of the ussr around the world to limit its adventurism to limit its economic and financial system to change us foreign policy to more a frank more direct as well as a broader picture of america 's integrated, systematic strategy to roll back and ultimately bring the soviet union and its empire to its death.

importance do americans attach to the un, it is the plenipotentiary at the same time the us national security council has always been in soviet times there was experience and experience unpleasant experience wrong when the ussr just protests that china takes not only takes place boycotted the meeting of the security council turned into a series of major diplomatic defeats. one of them led to the fact that the korean war was unleashed under flagship e. here is an example if russia now slams the door. this will again be a major diplomatic defeat and will allow at the level of the security council with impunity. maybe china will intercede and it’s not a question in this case to pass anti-russian resolutions with impunity, so ignore this site is not possible. now we need to fight for the votes of the general assembly. russia kept quite a large one. here is igor sergeevich's proposal for us to change ourselves. it’s not for them to try there, uh, change the structure, you need to change it yourself, as you can see, that’s just the stage three eras of veto application, first the soviet union applied uh, an

he is a former director for russia on the us national security council and senior military analyst withnd what sort of training have they had and it had weaponry they will need? i agree it is difficult to tell what the eventual dynamics will be in this war— the eventual dynamics will be in this war with these new conscripts, but russia — this war with these new conscripts, but russia has a lot of challenges incorporating this into the point earlier— incorporating this into the point earlier it — incorporating this into the point earlier it would take a lot of time and it— earlier it would take a lot of time and it will— earlier it would take a lot of time and it will take training. 300 is many— and it will take training. 300 is many to— and it will take training. 300 is many to transit if you will get the into the battlefield quickly you have _ into the battlefield quickly you have to — into the battlefield quickly you have to give them very little training~ _ have to give them very little training. russian troops typically receive _ training. russian troops typically receive most of th

nation, we have a separate leadership, and the request to them is quite simple and one to detach from us . climb thank you very much oleksiy danilov, secretary of the national security and defense councilsvoboda, thank you, we return to the topic of departure

america was formulated under president ronald reagan, even recorded in the documents of the us national security council gorbachev with his romantic attitude towards the west was perceived by the united states as a chance not for friendship. it is the destruction of the ussr, as one of the authors of this strategy now, living roger robinson, senior director for international economic affairs at the national security council of the reaganacs administration, describes the line of directive on national security decisions number 66 describes economic financial aspects of the destruction of the soviet union directive on decisions on national security number 75 described the general money in relation to the soviet union the document included measures to build up military power the main goals to limit the ability of the ussr around the world to limit its adventurism to restrictions on its economic and financial system to change foreign policy of the united states to a more frank, more direct, as well as a big picture of an integrated, systematic american strategy to discard and ultimately bring the soviet unio

for like, it's good to have you with us. western allies have stepped up their condemnation of the war in ukraine at a 10 session of the united nations security council. then un secretary general, describe the latest developments in the conflict as dangerous and disturbing. the u . s. issued a blunt warning to moscow to stop making nuclear threats, but rush us foreign minister, remain defiant, rejecting accusations of human rights abuses and ukraine. the international community close ranks on russia's attempts to escalate the war in ukraine. thank you for your determination. the u. s. put the blame squarely on russian president vladimir putin. one man chose this war. one man can end it. because if russia stops fighting the war ends. if you crane stops fighting ukraine ends. the un secretary general joined the condemnation, judging boulden for his field threats, use nuclear weapons. surely the israel bass, i have said from the start and the census war has unlimited potential to do terrible harm in ukraine and around the world. 2 year old, the 4 and bone saw the idea of nuclear conflict. once unthinkable has become a subject and debate. this in itself

us speak plainly. a permanent member of the united nations security council invaded its neighbor. attempted to erase the sovereign state from e

us from the united nation. so the united nations security council expected to meet later on today. james, talk us through what we can expect. yeah, i was just down at the security council moments ago actually where a meeting is just started on the democratic republic of congo. before that meeting spoke to the president of the security council, france, have the presidency this month. the president is the french ambassador, nicola the review. he told me that yes, definitely. now, 5 hours from now, the security council will meet and will vote on a resolution that's been drawn up by the u. s. and albania, condemning the action we've seen coming from moscow condemning the annexation of that territory inside ukraine, the most, the rest of the security council, se still ukrainian territory spoke also to the bus as he walked in, fergus missing the bus to tell me that very strongly with the position, this is a legal is wrong and it doesn't represent the, the will of the people living in those areas that i think is going to be the message you're going to be hearing from. certainly, the wester

security council means any human action on this issue is unlikely. does it have your corresponded mr. chris sent us this assessment of events in the security council here at the united nations general assembly in new york. that is a sense of patients running out with rasa. the united states, unsurprisingly, openly challenging vladimir putin to stop this war. but also allies like china in the security council, stopping sort of actively supporting rasa, saying that they want borders to be maintained, but also cooling for a pragmatic solution. whatever that means in the end, patience is wearing thin. also, amongst many nations here who are much more concerned about food security and climate change that often, cuz that is getting less attention here because of the war in ukraine. so in new york, patients wearing thin and the big question mark, what vladimir putin will do next. russian sold authorities in ukraine's east are due to begin holding votes on joining russia later today in what western countries are calling sham referendums. the votes are expected to last several days and result in the regions annexation by russia. they were known shortly after ukraine's forces liberat

dismissed the evidence put forward by russia as conspiracy theories that is routine us activity at the united nations security council in recent months. our k course one and kayla mop and thank you for that. update him. as the journalists, edwards all says that the sabotage of the north stream pipelines create their rift inside nato, between germany and the u. s. as europe finds itself any hopeless economical situation. i know how to draw the project probably to justify the thanks and probably also distract away the very real which are occurring inside the reading. that's one of the top 10 in germany. i suggested they should be a break up between america and germany. you think about the origin of what it was medically normally now why we got through that ratified airbus. let's say this is a german german problem right now. a lot of german say we're not going to have heat, but with our children are literally going to breeze. i think the biggest impact is that you're not going to replace the supply, the milton place, entities that you're going to slowly but surely an accident. so the 1st one is the population. secondly

security council, which can be interpreted as responsibility for what i i say as non-fulfillment of the charter of the united nations, moreover, it can be interpreted as the inadmissibility of the useto rules in the security council because the charter of the united nations is not observed, therefore from my point of view point of view and the first and second positions, i am absolutely right, because first of all, they clearly say that it is necessary to observe the statute and in such a situation, it is necessary to raise the question of russia's membership, their membership in the security council is to be voted on, but it is not about expulsion and about voting for the inclusion of the first and second well, as you understand, in the current situation, the un is unlikely to find the necessary number of votes to support the participation of the russian federation in the security council, i have no doubt now that china will support, but as far as the russian federation is concerned, i am convinced that it will not get the number of votes it needs, it is another matter, you can knock me down and say well, you are doing the same thing that the league of nations did before the war,

us speak plainly. a permanent member, the united nations security council, invaded its neighbor, attempted to erase the sovereign state from the map. russia has shamelessly violated the court tenants of the united nations charter no more important than the claire prohibition against countries taking the territory of their neighbor by force with me at the studio now instead of his chief international editor, richard walker, richard. yes, clear was there from you as president. we listen to both listen to him but not as strong as many me into it expected. yeah, well, i think the tone that biden hit in the speech, and i would imagine this was really quite deliberate. what was the kind of steady, a tone that he seemed to be trying to get across? obviously this day, it coming, going back to this morning here in europe with this announcement by vladimir putin, very much seen as potentially a kind of game changer in this conflict. entering a new phase with escalation on the russian side, mobilization of more russian forces. vladimir putin making nuclear threats. joe biden, addressing these very directly, but i

uh, the official representative of the us national security council, john kirby, said that in the very near future they will transfer another package of military assistance to ukraine, and, as kirby emphasized, in order to support the ukrainian offensive, and this assistance package will include, among other advanced american missile systems, and today the official representative of the russian ministry of foreign affairs, maria zakharova, very clearly formulated, where there is the russian last already red line, the intersection of which, as i understand it, maria vladimirovna can probably even lead to the third world war. here, listen to what she said. if washington decides to supply kiev with longer-range missiles, then it will cross the red line and become a direct party to the conflict. we reserve the right to defend our territory with all means available to us andrey andreevich well, it seems to me that the signal is very clear to me, the americans will listen this signal is sent to the americans through several diplomatic channels an interview of our ambassador in washington ant

nations. tensions simmer on the world stage. major headlines out of vladimir putin in moscow. mobileizing more troops, threatening to use possibly the use of nuclear weapons in ukraine. a lot to talk about. national security council with us in new york. first to jacqui heinrich across town on the east river at the united nations. good morning. >> it is not the first time vladimir putin has ratcheted up the nuclear rhetoric. as world leaders converge this is widely seen as an effort to get them to blink over support for ukraine. the white house has framed this escalation as a desperate move from a leader not confident. there have been pro-kremlin voices ratcheting up urgings for use a tactical nuclear weapons especially after a successful ukrainian counter offensive gained steam last week. >> those who like to blackmail us with nuclear weapons should know the winds can blow in their direction. >> it is the first time since world war ii russia called up reservists, 300,000 troops one way flights. putin accused the west of nuclear blackmail. follows russia's efforts to formally annex a fifth of ukraine. putin a more expansive definition of territory he could claim to be protecting and seen as an answer to president

us speak plainly. a permanent member of the united nations security council invaded its neighbor, attempted to erase the sovereign state from the map. russia has shamelessly related the gord tenants. in the united nations charter, no more important than the clear prohibition against countries taking the territory of their neighbor by force of president putin announced that partial military mobilization, early morning address, sits rushes 1st war time mobilization of this kind. since world war 2, gambrell is under, puts now from keith, with battlefield loss is mounting, and the ukrainian counter offensive advancing russian president vladimir putin says now was the time to mobilize more troops, yet as, as she the national union to protect her motherland its sovereignty. and territorial integrity to ensure the security of our nation and people in the liberated areas. i consider it necessary to call for partial mobilization in russia . for the defense minister says as many as 300000 russian reservists will report for duty immediately. but more could be called up if necessary. thornton also confirmed that he

us speak plainly. a permanent member of the united nations security council invaded its neighbour, attempted to erase the sovereign state from the map. russia has shamelessly violated the court tenants of the united nations charter. no more important than the clear prohibition against countries taking the territory of their neighbor by force a fairly clear message from buying their but did he have more for vladimir potent? well, that's when i asked our correspondent luck, whose name? new york? yes, he was quite clear and adamant that the united states and he actually spoke for the world community. speaking of the vast majority of you and countries and would stand in for those territorial boundaries, not to be pushed, not to be changed by force by russia. also he said that a nuclear war cannot be won and should not be fought. it must not before. it was a clear signal, not just to russia, but also to china. him, he basically warned against that nuclear arsenal build up there, but also towards north korea and iran. and he said that he would make sure the united states would, might make sure that iran does n

nations. take a listen. >> let us speak plainly. permanent member of the united nations security council invaded its neighbor. attempted to erase the sovereign state from the map. russia has shamelessly violated the core tenants of the united nations charter. >> part of what we heard from the president was he made the case that there was one man who started this war, putin. and there is one man who can bring it very quickly to a peaceful end at any moment. the russian president did not appear ready to do that just yet. >> let me bring in rav. what is the state of the conflict right now? how are ukrainian leaders reacting to president putin's threats? >> aaron, the state of the conflict is that ukrainians are on the march. u.s. officials are saying this flurry of announcements are a sign weakness. things are not going his way on the battlefield. they made the lightning advances in the north near kharkiv and u.s. officials say the fact he is threatening to lose nuclear swpz a sign he is not getting the results he wants on the battlefield. now the message from it ukrainian leaders is the same one it's been for s

hear the russian visavi because he is busy with the meeting of the national security and defense council, obviously today they are giving usails about what was discussed at this meeting as actually something very important i want to tell us and the secretary general of nato and genstoneberg please tell me that these are related things that we can today, listen to the video of the ukrainian president and what i want to say, the secretary general. well, i think that the actions of the russian federation that we have been watching over the last week and today's nightly decisions of president putin they are the challenges to which the national security and defense council and our other western partners must respond, who perfectly understand that such actions grossly violate all thinking and unthinkable norms of international law, the charter of the organization of the association, all bilateral, multilateral treaties whose participants include the russian federation. that is, in fact, this is such a plundering of the norms of international law, to which there must be an appropriate reaction, and the reaction from the side of u

un security council does not say even a single world -- word about the high-handed arbitrary, reckless war crimes of the united states. only accusing us of our righteous efforts to support national defense capabilities on a case-by-case basis, ensuring that the un security council has lost its competence and authority to act when it performs its duty to maintain international peace and security. as long as the double standards, unfairness, high handedness of the united states are not removed, decisions and resolutions adopted by the security council cannot have reasonable binding force nor the attributes of global peace and security. to put an end to the high handedness of these countries, including the united states, at the risk of the international security council community, with the sampling of these developing countries for the majority of the u.n. membership, as issued in the impartiality of the activities it should stick to the cognizant principles to serve the determinations of the peoples. the united states and other member states are trying to enforce on sovereign states international orders under the signposts of safeguarding democracy and protecting human rights. the

us speak plainly. a permanent member of the united nations security council invaded its neighbor. attempted to erase the sovereign state from the map. russia has shamelessly violated the court tenants of the united nations charter. no more important than the clear prohibition against countries taking the territory of their neighbor by force. >> the clear message from biden there. did he have more for vladimir putin? >> it was quickly and he was quick adamant -- he actually spoke for the world community, speaking for the vast majority of you and countries that would stand in for those territorial boundaries not to be pushed or changed by force from russia and he said a nuclear war cannot be won and should not be fought. it was a clear signal not just russia but also to china and he basically warned against their nuclear arsenal build up there but also toward north korea and iran. he said he would make sure the united states -- he would make sure that iran would not require a nuclear weapon. we are already seeing some very clear rhetoric from the u.s. president along with the messag

and maybe even help us with a military agreement. organizations of the united nations during the last month. in particular, we saw how the united nations or the un security councilied to use russia in the situations around the zaporizhzhia npp when they went there with heavy equipment, then there was a mission of the mgateka that came to the zaporizhia npp in energodar, we see how russia is methodically trying to use this high platform, the highest platform in the world, and whether there was or is there any certain way to avoid manipulation by the russians in the organization of the united nations, and in what way to do so that the highest tribune in the world does not turn into the russians using it for propaganda for their er their interpretation of what is happening in ukraine in favor of the kremlin, unfortunately for certain, including them , for the promotion of their people er, we are fine we understand how it's all done, er, the speech is cut in the middle of the pensions, it is shown on russian television, or there is a copy-show. well , it is presented as er, well, everything there, how it happened , that is, the standards that are heard from western

several important events are taking place, firstly in the kremlin, and secondly, the national defense security council promised us decisions that will be fundamentally important in for the country as a whole, the secretary general of nato will make an urgent statement at 6 p.m. well, somehow, as if i didn't notice, the event passed us by that yesterday, in fact, the president of the russian federation spoke to putin once again , who is hoping for some kind of negotiations between putin and zelensky, although the ukrainian the president quite clearly articulated that in the event of referendums being held in the occupied territories, any negotiations with the russian federation would be absolutely excluded. on his part, the kremlin noted that no, we are ready to speak but on our terms, hmm, hinting at the capitulation of our country, sir, lying down, do you believe that any war in any case ends with negotiations and the signing of something where everyone meets in the middle, any war will definitely end and this war will end with our victory that as for the position of president zelensky, you know that a few month

us to uphold its purposes and principles. and we must not stand id by when a major nucular power armed the t. a founding member of the united nations on a permanent member of the un security council, no less seeks to shift borders through the use of violence. there is no justification whatsoever for russia's war of occupation against ukraine. an independent forensic investigation is found that the killing of sharina block lay by israeli soldiers in may was deliberate. it's ruled out the possibility that sharon was killed during a confrontation between israeli forces and palestinian gunmen and janine in the occupant. westbank louis acting fisheries family have filed a complaint at the international criminal court in the hague. they want the court to investigate. i, kenny. meanwhile at least one palestinian has been killed in the occupied west bank during fighting between palestinian fighters and palestinian authority forces. the violence began all to the arrested to palestinians on tuesday morning, including a senior figure in the meadows. she wing off hum us the rest was made by palestinian officials, hurricane pianist continuing to gain strength and threaten lives as they ripped

nations general assembly u. s. president joe biden told the u. m, that russia's actions and ukraine should make that blood run cold. let us speak plainly. a permanent member of the united nations security council invaded its neighbor, attempted to erase the sovereign state from the map. russia has shamelessly violated the court. tenants of united nations charter. no more important than the clear prohibition against countries taking the territory of their neighbor by force. currently, russian men aged $18.00 to $27.00 are obliged to do military service usually for a year with exemptions for medical grounds and also for students. this means russia could, in theory, mobilize 25000000 people with military experience. but the kremlin insist that con scripts won't be sent to fight in ukraine. and beginning of the year, russia had $900000.00 active troops. ukraine's forces are much smaller with just more than a $196000.00. but cave has since ordered mass mobilization, which boosted its numbers. russia launched its invasion of ukraine with a 190000 troops. in february, a partial mobilization means another 300000 reserves will be drafted to fight in ukraine. from wednesday, russian defense minister ser

rushes use, is vito power to block or un security council resolution condemning it sonic sation of 4 more ukrainian regions, diplomatic out of the james base? joining me now from the united nations in new york, james talk us through what's been happening at the security council when in many ways, it wasn't a surprise that russia used its veto because of course, this was a resolution drawn up by albania and the u. s. they jointly came up with a resolution condemning russia for his actions, for those so called referenda. and for the announcement of the annexation that we've seen in recent hours from our president, putin as worth noting that most of the security council supported this resolution. although it was vetoed by russia, but there were 4 countries that decided they were going to abstain china, india, brazil, and gabon. what happens next is that this will now be taken by the u. s. to the general assembly of the united nations where we're all 193 member states, get their view and a similar sort of resolution we expect to be put to the vote at some point next week. immediately after the security council meeting, i spoke to one of ukraine staunchest supporters. that's the u. k

joining us now, national security council coordinator for strategic communications at the white house for being with us this morning. what are you all reading into this meeting between putin and xi in uzbekistan at a time when russia is frankly on the run a bit in ukraine, being pushed back by the counter offensive. >> i think the way you kind of introed this willie, was interesting and spot on, the russians and kremlin certainly making a lot more about this meeting than you're going to hear from beijing. for president xi, this is a multilateral meeting, not just a meeting with vladimir putin. these are two countries that have a shaky partnership, if you will. neither one of them completely trusts the other. but on the same token, we haven't seen them, you know, move to violate the sanctions that are in place. so we'll be watching this closely, be interesting to see how they both characterize this. but china has a choice, and we obviously continue to hope that they'll make a choice to not do any business as usual with russia, to not side with russia. certainly as they continue to pros