even if there is a i the us or nato. even if there is a ceasefire — the us or nato. s where it — ceasefire and the lions freezes where it is _ ceasefire and the lions freezes where it is now. _ ceasefire and the lions freezes where it is now, that— ceasefire and the lions freezes where it is now, that still- ceasefire and the lions freezes i where it is now, that still affords russia _ where it is now, that still affords russia a — where it is now, that still affords russia a really— where it is now, that still affords russia a really good _ where it is now, that still affords russia a really good jumping - where it is now, that still affords russia a really good jumping offl russia a really good jumping off point _ russia a really good jumping off point for— russia a really good jumping off point for future _ russia a really good jumping off point for future aggression - russia a really good jumping off i point for future aggression against ukraine _ point for future aggression against ukraine and — point for future aggression against ukraine and the _ point for futu

to attack any of. the us nato allies who reconsider is not up _ the us nato allies who reconsider is it is about money, like the - it is about money, like the americans— it is about money, like the americans have _ it is about money, like the americans have to - it is about money, like the americans have to dig i it is about money, like the . americans have to dig deep, it is about money, like the - americans have to dig deep, they're going _ americans have to dig deep, they're going out— americans have to dig deep, they're going out for— americans have to dig deep, they're going out for dinner— americans have to dig deep, they're going out for dinner with _ americans have to dig deep, they're going out for dinner with these i going out for dinner with these countries — going out for dinner with these countries aren't— going out for dinner with these countries aren't always - going out for dinner with these countries aren't always gettingj going out for dinner with these i countries aren't always getting out their wallets _ countries aren't always getting out their wallets. figure _

in july 2018. nato secretary general young sheldon back and us president donald trump clashed on camera, out of nato summit and brussels. germany is just being a little bit over one percent. where's the united states and actual numbers is 4.2 percent of a much larger g d p. so i think that's an appropriate roles. you know, we're protecting germany, we're protecting france, we're protecting everybody. and yet we're paying a lot of money to project. now this has been going on for decades, and the numerous of the countries go out and make a pipeline deal with russia, where they're paying billions of dollars into the coffers of russia. and i think that's very inappropriate. and the former chancellor of germany is the head of the pipeline company that supplying the gas in 2014 nato member states agreed to spend a 2 percent of gdp on defense. but apart from the united states modeling, any countries stuck to it, the john bolton was us national security advisor for around 18 months under donald trump until the president forced him to resign. when i took the job, this national security advisor,

us. not just with nato, but also with ukraine and us support to ukraine. mm hm. at russia says dialogue with nato has reached a critical 0 level. do you believe that to be true? or there are really no remaining communication channels between nato and moscow as well. i, there's not the kind of, um, uh, communication that we've had in the past where nato, in fact, hosted a russian mission or was, has a committees where nato met with russia. there was quite a bit of communication. now if there's communication at all is done through a back. campbell is done through a 3rd party. we have an investor in the united states. does another allies do in russia as well? so there's communication, but it's not quite that public communication that we've had over the past number of years since the end of the cold war. now, to what degree does need those future depend on the outcome of the war in ukraine? well, nato is future is secure in this sense, but no matter what happens, nato is going to stay together and we're going to be f, a defense of alliance, in support of the defense o

nato, which is what trumpet said. he wanted to do, there's a lot of ways he could downgrade the us, representation of nato or potentially pull some us forces out of nato. so that's what he decides to do. he tried to do that. one is had a 1st term. so there's a lot that hangs in the balance with this presidential legend happening in the us, not just with nato, but also with ukraine and us support to ukraine. mm hm. at russia says dialogue with nato has reached a critical 0 level. do you believe that to be true, or there are really no remaining communication channels between nato and moscow as well i, there's not the kind of, um, uh, communication that we've had in the past where nato, in fact, hosted a russian mission or was, has a committees where nato met with russia, and there was quite a bit of communication. now if there's communication at all is done through a back. campbell is done through a 3rd party. we have an and passenger in the united states. does another allies do in russia as well? so there's communication, but it's not quite that public communication that we've had over the past number of years since the

nato. you are also soundin: us commitment to nato. you are also sounding the — us commitment to nato. us commitment to nato. you are also sounding the alarm about _ us commitment to nato. you are also sounding the alarm about connectionsi sounding the alarm about connections between different conflicts. you name checked iran helping russia, china, north korea, do you think we are in a new era of instability? yes. and the challenges that nato remains a regional alliance in north america and europe, it will remain that. but the threats and the challenges we face, they are global. security is not regional it is global. the war in ukraine demonstrates that very clearly. russia is receiving support from its friends and partners in asia. china is propping up the russian war economy and delivering key parts to the defence industry, and in return moscow is mortgaging its future to beijing. he ran delivers drones and other military equipment to russia in return russia is delivering technology to the iranian missile and nuclear programmes. the same with north korea. enormous amounts, hundreds of

under the plans, nato would take over the coordination of some military aid from a us—led coalition, tential return to the white house of donald trump, who is a critic of nato. mr stoltenberg was asked by the bbc if the us had got its priorities wrong by arming israel, while failing to pass funding for ukraine in congress. every day of delay in the decision of the united states on providing more support to ukraine has consequences on the battlefield. that's one of the reasons why the ukrainians now have to ration ammunition. it is urgent that the united states make a decision and the us congress actually is able to turn the majority in the us public, but also in the us congress, into a concrete decision. our defence correspondent jonathan beale who was at the nato meeting has more. jens stoltenberg, the head of nato, said ukraine wasn't running out of courage, but it was running out of ammunition, and once again he appealed for the us to pass its military aid that's got stalled in congress. he is notjust worried about the present, but also the longer term. jens stoltenberg therefore h

you pretty much use all nato for equipment but the russian equipment order using some of them to get the chart, this is what it is like a. he cannot deter russia from a large territory unless you are prepared for ukraine to move which we are not prepared. we will fight until we went and if we went ukraine becomes, that will make nato and families more secure so this is what we have to discuss and if we are all on the same page on this how we get there, concrete plans on how to be more prepared going through our annual plans and it was executed successfully and it was created to do this. and they put together, that's not how it works so we have to keep in mind to be ambassadors as nato. to be crystal here about that objective and that is not shared by all and it is a unanimous decision. and how we get to that. >> as you said ukraine is fighting for us to a certain degree i agree with the ambassador with focus too much and it's more important the underlying direction. ambassador from york perspective move things forward worst four peace membership us not going to be tomorrow, there's h

despite the fact that we are not yet members of nato, we are the largest ally. we use nato equipment,instructors work for us, but most importantly, we are now ukrainians, the ukrainian armed forces protect freedom and democracy in all nato countries. we are here to stop the enemy who wants to attack these countries, and if we did not do this, a return to the times of stalin in ukraine and in the whole of europe would be inevitable. today there is no consensus on the official dispatch of ground troops, but... in dynamic terms , nothing can be ruled out, we are doing everything possible to ensure that russia cannot win this war. macron has already understood this, and even despite his promises to send nato troops, that is, his french troops to ukraine, asked the ukrainians of eastern europe for forgiveness for the fact that he was wrong and did not listen to what they told him about the possibility of the next aggression. the baltic sea actually became the internal sea of ​​the alliance, because sweden and finland... have already become an alliance, the weimar triangle is born and reviv

as they say, they arrived at the tank school, foreign curators conducted training there using nato equipmentrussian troops are launching precision strikes on everything related to the ukrainian military industry. this is a response to... attempts by the ukrainian armed forces to harm our energy facilities. more and more new volunteers are signing up for contract service; the number of volunteers has increased significantly since the terrorist attack in crocus cityhole. this is one of the selection points in the moscow region; over the past week and a half , more than 800 people have signed contracts in the region. they have already begun to prepare at training grounds, in training centers; in just 10 days, there are over 16 thousand volunteers throughout the country. anything will help, now they started paying drivers in january, january-february, they received a special payment. large-scale program in moscow has begun. the design of the central hippodrome is not only a unique sports facility, a complex with a rich history, our cultural heritage; large works are planned in the adjacent terri

and the only time that nato has actually been used to defend one of the member nations was in afghanistanour nato allies went with us to afghanistan and fought with us in afghanistan. lots of their soldiers actually died in afghanistan defending our mission. so it's kind of crazy that we should back out or drop out or decrease when we are the ones who have actually benefited the most from it. but like i said, to go back to the first point, we are not paying into a community fund or anything. we are paying for our own military. their own military is what, actually, we bring to nato. that's how it's set up. all these other countries are paying for their own military. but i think right now, if we are looking at the incidence in ukraine, it's kind of separate from ukraine funding. i think we should definitely fund ukraine. another caller said that they invaded because it was an expansion of nato. well, i remember, before the invasion, most of the european allies, including our own administration, were ready to say that ukraine would never be part of nato. they were willing to give that to put

the us led to group that coordinates weapon shipments to ukraine. nato is seeking to reduce its dependence on the us, where a $60000000000.00 ukrainian a package has been installed in congress for months. sold and burg, also told members of the press that the security of the block depended on bolstering the rule of lot throughout the world's ukraine will become a member of nato. it is the question when nope, if tomorrow we also need to, well, we're in the pacific partners, australia, the seasons are pano southcourt out together with the european union. we know that our security is now regional. it is global. the war in the crane industry. it's this clearly russia's friends, the nation are vital for continuing its war of aggression. signed laws popping up russia's war economy in return, most goal is mortgaging its future to bridging north korea. i'm it wrong or the living substantial supplies of weapons and ammunition in return from young. i'm fed on receiving russian technology and supplies that help them advance. let me start a new set of capabilities these as the regional on global secur

ukraine, but of course a number of nato countries have uniformed men in their embassies in kiev who provide advice. we must remember supplying arms to ukraine for the usharity, but an investment in our own security. the same narrative is being pushed. this may be the last us aid package for a very long time, or even the last at all. but for now in luxembourg, where the foreign ministers of the 27 european union countries have gathered for a scheduled meeting, there is enthusiasm. the americans are back in the game, but american billions will end up in the american defense industry, and the european union is desperate. we asked all countries to look for air defense systems and ammunition to strengthen ukraine's air defense. the main task is to find patriots, whom zelensky again does not ask, but demands, and he began to be rude immediately after the decision of the congress. title in american press. zelensky challenges the west. air defense systems can be called patriotic only if they work and save lives. they stand motionless somewhere on the bases. wounds, but the thing is that europe has very few of their patriots, according to the estimates of the

orders for... the defense of greece, there were demands to stop sponsoring the military plans of the us, natond the eu, not to involve greece in them, to close american military bases on the country's territory. the latvian government is preparing to consider a ban on teaching russian as a second foreign language in schools, although they promise to do it in stages so as not to provoke a crisis in the education system. after all, teachers will have to look for new jobs; schoolchildren will have to find new courses. currently, russian is taught in half of latvian schools. in the sphere of services and trade it cannot be done without it, and despite bellicose statements addressed to russia, the baltic republics continue to feed themselves from goods transit to the neighboring country. the uk continues to rise in price for housing; its average price in april exceeded the mark of $459,000 and came very close to the record levels that were recorded in may of 2023. annual rate price growth in the united kingdom in april was 1.7%, which is the highest in... partnership in minsk, a meeting was held b

and you ask what nato wants from us. natoears after the end of the period. well, they've gotten to the point where now we have to force them, if you like, to also an operation to force peace, what is happening now in ukraine, a special military operation is our operation to force peace on the ukrainian authorities, who unleashed a civil war on their own territory, and the north atlantic alliance, which does not see... other foreign policy options , security policy, except for imposing your will and demonstrating your military power to the entire surrounding world with russia, this will not work, this is absolutely certain, and we have demonstrated this exhaustively at over the past 2 years. from your point of view, let's digress from rhetoric, let's talk about how we see the real intentions of nato, they would be satisfied, for example, with regard to control over such strong ones from the fact that they rule the world and therefore everything, countries like russia, have no red flags for them lines, has no borders, and of co

nato. when we come back, i want to push you a little bit to share with us information about how nato the united states and other western countries can get away with these narratives that they're so good at creating that seem to go on challenge george sam. well, when we come back talking about that very thing right here, stay with us because we've got a lot more to ask about this curious, curious situation. the take a fresh look around is life kaleidoscopic. isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power to division with no real opinions fixtures designed to simplify. it will confuse really once a better wills, and is it just as a chosen for you, fractured images, present it is, but can you see through their illusion going underground? can jessica is off the gaining independence and from the form of the ivory coast remained under the strong influence of its foam and metropolitan pro french president, phoenix, who save one, you ruined the country for 33 years, ensuring the interest to from the dead. the government dean isn't in the trunk. then there's also including his foster ladies chestnut g

let's speak to patrick bury, former nato analyst and defence expert at the university of bath. thank you very much for being with useate perhaps this long—term fund for ukraine so that it is notjust temporary fix every few months —— trump—proof. is that going to work, in terms of helping ukraine? find in terms of helping ukraine? and evenin: , in terms of helping ukraine? and evening. ben- — in terms of helping ukraine? and evening, ben. i— in terms of helping ukraine? fific evening, ben. ithink in terms of helping ukraine? fific evening, ben. i think the in terms of helping ukraine? fific evening, ben. i think the way that the funding has evolved since the invasion a couple of years ago of ukraine is that of course the nations gave big amount of money and weapons and stuff as they could in separate tranches and always with the view again on not excluding the situation and idea of trying to manage the risk of escalation with russia, so that's how it's evolved, and i think whatjen stoltenberg is saying is it does need to go into a more structured and long—term approach because what's happened with the delay in the 60 bi

nato. when we come back, i want to push you a little bit to share with us information about how nato the united states and other western countries can get away with these narratives that they're so good at creating that seem to go on challenge george sam. well, when we come back talking about that very thing right here, stay with us because we've got a lot more to ask about this curious, curious situation. the the, the, the magenta itself, the gaining independence and from the form of the ivory coast remained under the strong influence of its full metropolitan pro french president, phoenix, who say, borne, you rule the country for 33 years, ensuring the interest to from the dead. the gun on feeding isn't in the trunk. then there's no simple new foster larry shifting backwards was dumb so strong. and the more appropriate after the death of, of a one year and usually to bill i'll come back the ball came to power. and i'm ready to double, for example, we have curious to know if we're picking up from the was it isn't good enough for tiffany to one is the one that the bronze immediately deemed good

foreign secretary lord cameron has said he's working to get ukraine and nato into the best possible shape by november, ahead of the uslection. speaking to the lucy hockings and vitaly shevchenko for bbc s ukrainecast podcast he also ruled out western boots on the ground in ukraine. what nato�*s looking at is a nato mission for ukraine, not a nato mission for ukraine, not a nato mission in ukraine. it is making sure that we use nato�*s architecture to help deliver some of the support that ukraine needs. but fundamentally i think that we should do everything we can to help ukraine. that has been britain's position. i think it is not escalatory to say we are going to help this independent sovereign country to fight off an aggressor and we will help them to do that. you don't see the prospect of nato boots on the ground in ukraine? ma. boots on the ground in ukraine? no. i think that boots on the ground in ukraine? firm i think that we don't want to give putin a target like that. and nato can do lots of things to better co—ordinate the help we give to ukraine. but fundamentally for countries like britain and those suppor

i can see the us perspective, having worked in nato, _ that? e the us perspective, having worked in nato, i know - that? i can see the us perspective, having worked in nato, i know theyj having worked in nato, i know they use diplomatic channels for decades to ask europe to pay and contribute more. and part of that as being the world's superpower and having to bankroll it — but on the other hand, when it gets to this situation where everyone is strapped for resources and there is a major threat of increasing in europe, i think it's legitimate and right to say, "look, if you can't meet the 2%, why should you be under our umbrella equipment" this is the membership criteria for the club and i think that's fair enough. trump has obviously rattled that cage much more publicly than before which put a lot of people's noses out, but the real instigator of that was the 2014 russian annexation of crimea which woke up a lot of eastern european and baltic nations. so i think that's been the real instigator and the rise has been explained since then, and 202

countries, what we lack, let's be more specific, including in order to become a full member of... us nato, combat aviation in the sky, additional air defense systems, satellite and other communications protected by nato standards, a the main thing is that every fighter has it, in a helmet, you know, a helmet that protects the life of our defender, but even there you need communication and a lot of other information, which on the battlefield makes it possible to fight effectively according to nato standards, and all this each of our defenders, each unit should receive, that's what we're working on. but i emphasize once again who we work with, we work precisely with nato member countries, that is, in essence, as a candidate country for joining nato, as well as with the european union, only in peaceful spheres, i emphasize that this is the most important thing, and for military specialists, for our general staff, well, it's not a secret either, well , they already work with nato advisers and directly with the commanders of the armed forces of nato member countries, and with the commander, by

accusation as it is a dangerous tactic on the part of ukraine. ukraine is asked if about bag, for the us nato countries to play some more money and more arms to combat the tax on their own territory. they say, and they have to, they have received it by the way, most of the funds, most of the money to the tune of hundreds of hundreds of billions of dollars buy some estimates, something like 300 and $20000000000.00 has been punch to them. this is stop and think about that number $320000000000.00. but it seems most of that funding has been sent and spent and still ukraine has not been successful in repelling russian advances. those are just the facts. okay. in fact, most military analysts, even those now in the west, the guys you see on like cnn and the bbc and fox and all those places, they're going on the air and having to admit for the 1st time that ukraine is losing ukraine is losing this war with russia, and it's continually giving up more and more territory. now, if that's the case, which it seems to be, why them is ukraine not taking every penny that it has left or every penny that it get

when attacking takmak, militants of the kiev regime used nato weapons with destructive elements, as evidenced by fragments from scattered rockets. the russian army repelled 13 attacks and liberated the pervomayskoe militant point. in orenburg, over 300 houses and about 800 household plots were flooded. more than 188 million rubles have already been paid to those affected by the flood. about the situation margarita semenyuk. there was a lot of water leaking into the house, the basement collapsed, and there was already water on the first floors. a serious struggle against the elements is unfolding on cherepanov street. people are trying their best to protect their residential complex on the embankment and contain the flow of water. the situation is the same in the dubki complex area. special transport was prepared for people so that they could get into the apartments for a while. due to the fact that uralskaya street was flooded and it was impossible to get into the dubki residential complex, the administration turned to the heads of enterprises, who always cooperate with the administration of

but what i do want to do this morning as i want to walk us through all that has happened inside the nato alliance over just the last two years. since russia launched its unprovoked war of aggression in ukraine. these last two years have in many ways been transformative, and i do not use that word lightly. i do not think there is a better word to describe what has happened across the nato alliance since the war started. i think they have showcased time and time again nato's agility and its innovation. let me walk you through five big changes that we have seen in the last two years. first, after many years of focusing on expeditionary operations, or you will remember in the 1990's they were often referred to as out of area operations, the alliance has come home and returned to its core mandate of collective defense. it has taken a series of dramatic steps to enhance its deterrence. before the war even started, nato allies were moving force posture into eastern europe. you will remember that nato, just a few months after the war started, announced four new multinational battalions on the ea

let's hear what it is about says ivo dalder, former us ambassador to nato.n if trump becomes president in the future, his influence is already felt . once during the budget debate in the united states, back in september , president biden's administration sent a budget request: in october, they asked for $100 billion to support israel, taiwan, and ukraine. and that request has stalled in congress, in part because trump opposes such funding. all this worries not only nato allies, but especially ukraine. and this procrastination is very much helps russia, which thinks it can probably win now. war sooner than ever because the united states is not living up to its obligations at a time when ukraine is suffering from open aggression and needs help. currently, europe, together with nato, with the support of the united states, wants to make sure that it does not happen during the elections in the united states or in domestic american politics, the alliance and europe as a whole, including ukraine, can continue to count on the security that they did not have, this ca

we we thought it was only possible with these guys. but it turned out that this is possible with us, nato-fascistsf yugoslavia, these are precisely the slogans that are heard today at rallies in the center of belgrade, 25 years since the nato aggression against yugoslavia, fascists, nazo- fascists. standing terrorists, albanians in kosovo, and really wanted to show with this example to the whole world what will happen if someone does not agree with nato orders. serbia has never agreed to this and will never agree. today we have kosovo as a value that is passed on from generation to generation. here you see, from the 13th century to the present day we have been constantly going on, that is, there are whole, that is, trains. unrelated, that is, a whole cultural, cultural and historical process, such a deep process is connected specifically with kosovo and metohija, and naturally, kosovo and metohija, kos is a bird, metoh is a church possession of land, that is, the name itself says that this is a church estate. this is how ordinary serbs express their disagreement with the actions of the west regard

soured since monday's killing of 7 aid workers, and then is really air strike and gaza. us and speaking at a nato meeting in brussels, us secretary of state anthony blank, and called on israel to do more to protect civilians and allow access to humanitarian aid. we need to see an immediate cease fire to enable the release of hostages, but also to enable a dramatic search and humanitarian assistance as well as obviously better protecting civilians. now, as i said, the president, the prime minister just spoke, but it's uh, our expectation that is real will and certainly should announce concrete specific measurable steps that it will take and take as soon as possible to make sure that there can be an effective search and assistance that it can be sustained and that you may have trained workers and civilians are better protected. and dw washington correspondent benjamin alvarez gruber and told us more about the call between biden and yahoo. that's right. what's the 1st time between both leaders? since this is really as dry killed as 7 a to work is in gaza, according to the white house read out a pris

nato only when we win. i don't think that they will take us during the war. in nato, for some it is a risk of nato members, some, some people simply have skepticism because of it. the issue of nato is a question, the secretary general incorrectly said, it is a question of the majority, and the majority is a political question. and to take political ukraine into the alliance. this requires victory. so, sir. as far as i understand, ukraine has nothing to expect from the nato jubilee summit in july, formally speaking ukraine may receive this invitation, but this invitation will be delayed in time before ours. victory in the war with russia. i would immediately clarify a very important issue, that actually ukraine's membership in nato, and the main engine and locomotive of our membership, is the armed forces of ukraine. time. second, every step that we are now taking together with nato member countries, at ramstein, at joint exercises from abroad in nato member countries , our military specialists, the best, by the way, and he... other issues cooperation up to intelligence cooperation, all this is the gradual

soon the ukrainian armed forces launched a counterattack using nato infantry fighting vehicles. it commander monitored the battle using a drone and helped his subordinates change positions in time. accordingly, we allowed the enemy equipment to approach and decided to target the enemy equipment with anti-tank guns. here. accordingly, my pturist immediately opened the fire hit the target. the next counterattack of the ukrainian armed forces. now they threw tanks at the attack aircraft. rona kamikaze, there were four such attacks in total, the battle lasted two days, the enemy eventually retreated, it was radimir maksimov who made the decisive contribution, in total he destroyed 27 militants, being wounded, he took command, continued to carry out the combat mission, repelling the enemy’s repeated counterattacks, that 's all. unemotionally, the connection came out without shouting, calmly, clearly, radimir’s numerous wounds, fortunately, turned out to be insignificant, it is clear that he has difficulty finding words when he remembers the assault, but noticeably perks up when talk a

nato's direct entry into armed conflict, but it means that we will now be able to use nato's coordination training, and planning capabilities to support ukraine in order to coordinate its activity. russia is simply on fire, what do you say about this, will this step somehow give ukraine an opportunity to feel more confident? i repeat, this is still puffing up the cheeks, that is... when russia systematically deploys a military industry there and builds up this military machine to destroy ukraine in the future, when it somehow uses parts from the western world and can afford to manufacture up to several dozen long-range missiles per month. nato is still thinking about and discussing some mystical missions, and what's more, 100 billion, the amount in 100 billion for 5 years, that is 20 billion per year, which , by the way, has not yet been approved, it is supposed to be approved at the summit in washington, and it will be given to us there like a sweet pill, instead of asking for... ukraine to nato, it has already become clear to everyone, everyone knows, and accordingly, this is not the in

what does it tell us. in terms — nato over ukraine. ver ukraine. what does it tell us, in terms of politics in _ nato over ukraine. what does it tell us, in terms of politics in slovakia i us, in terms of politics in slovakia or society in general that zuzana caputova had been harassed and received death threats? yes. caputova had been harassed and received death threats? yes, well, she has had _ received death threats? yes, well, she has had a _ received death threats? yes, well, she has had a pretty _ received death threats? yes, well, she has had a pretty torrid - received death threats? yes, well, she has had a pretty torrid time . received death threats? yes, well, she has had a pretty torrid time of| she has had a pretty torrid time of it since she came to power five years ago. she was elected president in the wake of the murder of the slovak investigative journalist and his fiancee in 2018, and she was not a politician, she came into thejob, but she said, i was ready for the rough—and—tumble left slovak politics but i was not rea

does not mean nato's direct entry into an armed conflict, but it means that we will now be able to use nato'sdination, training, and planning capabilities to support ukraine, in order to to coordinate their activity in russia is just burning, what do you say about it, this step will somehow give the opportunity for ukraine to feel more confident, i repeat, this is so far puffing up the cheeks, that is , when russia systematically deploys the military industry there and builds up this military machine to destroy ukraine in the future, when it somehow... uses parts from the western world and can to allow the production of up to several dozen long-range missiles per month in nato, so far they are thinking and discussing some mystical missions, and moreover, 100 billion sums in 100 billion for 5 years is 20 billion per year and which, by the way, is not approved, it should supposedly be approved at the summit in washington, and it will be given to us there like a sweet pill, instead of inviting ukraine to nato, it has already become clear to everyone, everyone knows, and accordingly, it is not th

well, for us, nato and...antic alliance is de facto a party to the ukrainian conflict, is actively involved in organizing the shelling of russian territories by neo-nazis, within its framework collective decisions are made on new supplies of weapons with an increase in their technical and long-range capabilities, nato instructors in several countries are training mercenaries and saboteurs for their participation in anti-russian operations. the plans of the united states and nato include preserving ukraine, or at least part of it, as an anti-russian territory entirely under their control, completely dedicated to serving the interests of the north atlantic bloc. in this regard , the tasks of demilitarizing ukraine remain relevant. as we see, there are directly opposing interests, colliding; how far can this clash go? well, everything will depend on how the situation will develop on the battlefield. they can talk as much as they want. they can do a lot, but in my opinion they most likely won’t actually use their

be with us. natoveloping a new format for assistance to ukraine - said the secretary general of the alliance, jens stoltenberg, before the beginning of the meeting of foreign ministers in brussels. according to him, the heads of foreign affairs will discuss how the bloc can take on more responsibility to guarantee stability.

nato chief in stoughton parks. i saying this was sunday, a strong message to rush. i can you tell us a little bit more about it and how united nato members are on it? that's right, this is something they're really cheating up for the washington summit that takes place in early july. they are not expected to grant you crane membership as keep would like at the summit, but they do want to extend a solid package of support. and as you mentioned earlier, there's a lot of concern about where the us will stand, not necessarily in july, but after november. and so they want to make sure that this group that was founded . in fact, by the us defense secretary, lloyd austin, the ramstein group will continue in some form after the elections, no matter what happens there. and that's why they've been talking for some time about moving some of those responsibilities in the us led group under nato. that would make sure that no matter what happens in elections there or in any other country for that matter, that this kind of cooperation with ukraine would go on and then it gives them a way to ensure y

so yes, then what he's saying is that the us nato allies, they funds money into countries, and then we see tensions arising. and we have seen that time and time again, and now what are the issues that could have contributed to tensions between the united states and china? yeah, it's interesting because on to the blinking was old like we are friends, we go, you know, great partnership. we're talking about this, so the economic abilities of working together and the reality is there a massive issues between the us and china, and these have been going on for some time. but in terms of what's really bubbling right now, you know, the social media aspect talk incredibly popular. this is a chinese social media app and it's taken over the will young people in particular, love this app. the us has now said it wants to find that app it will. ringback find that out because it doesn't like the messages that are being spread. it says that take tool is also taking information from people. but this is a big catch. have us to say we will button it if you sell it to a weston for your company. so that's