and yes, i have heard the task force ask us redact, it we have not redacted anything. if something is even requested of us from the judge, there are a lot of things that go in place that are handled by our city attorneys where it is confidencal and where it is closed and so forth and on. so we have been very forth right in our responses to the task force committee, to patrick monet shaw and to you as the ethics committee. and we have nothing that we can disclose. it is all a part of our file. >> how much correspondence is there between the city controller's office and the ethics commission regarding this complaint? >> i can't respond to that. >> you can't tell me that the volume? >> the volume, so my question would be what difference does that make? with all due respect, just simply because i myself need to be very careful what i say about any of the cases. and so, the poin ant cases i think that we have the appropriate type of conversations that we are supposed to have as it relates to ensuring that we do not have due process efforts going on in the city between the et

methods that i used to conduct that research, and i think they are all fairly typical journalistic methods. >> what will you do now? >> [inaudible] >> are you going to get beyond redactions? >> i'm going to try, using these same methods. >> i am with the program here -- and investigative reporting program, and you start the talk by saying the fbi veered from its original mission, but didn't sense how that happen. one was a mechanism that led the fbi to veer from the original mission. how did they rationalize it? what was it? did they suspect this dissent equals being a spy for a foreign country? what -- how did they come -- how did they move from original mission to whatever they were doing at the time? >> right. hoover was fix sated on the -- fixated on the communism party and believed anyone in the party was a threat to the united states. as years went by, he expanded that definition of "subversive," and, in fact, there's no legal definition of "subversive. >> there's one more document. >> where are you? >> you can see it up here. there's a hard copy of it. he explains in the book one of the things the fbi did was create a list of 15,000 people who are to be rounded up

several other assets he exposed in libya who had cooperated with us and who are now in danger even wiki leaks went to great lengths to redact sensitive names when they released their trove of state department cables last year but i say in his sterile rush to burn the obama administration before the election chose to not even take those commonsense measures he chose to put at risk the lives of innocent libyans and americans and embassy because embarrassing the white house politically and now is his top priority no matter what the consequences according to article three section three of the united states constitution treason against the united states shall consist only in levying war against them or in here or in adhering to their enemies giving them aid and comfort by releasing the names of the libyans who've been working with the united states in a very dangerous part of the world has provided aid and comfort to our enemies in that region those same enemies who attacked our consulate on september eleventh and killed our ambassador another diplomat and his two security guards this is treason they're all eyes that should be s

used to conduct that research, and i think they're all fairly typical journalistic methods. >> what are you going to do now? >> what will i do now? >> [inaudible] >> yeah. are you going to get beyond the redactions? >> are i'm going to try. [laughter] using these same methods. >> my name is -- [inaudible] and i am with the irp program here at the school, investigative reporting program, and you started your talk by saying that the fbi have veered from its original mission, but you didn't tell us how that happened, what was the mechanism that led the fbi to veer from its original mission. how did they rationalize it? what was it? did they suspect that dissent equals being a spy for a foreign country? how did they come, how did they move from the original mission to whatever they were doing at the time? >> with -- right. hoover was fixated on the communist party, and he believed anybody in the communist party was a potential threat to the united states. and as the years went by, he expanded that definition of subversive. in fact, no legal definition of subversive -- >> [inaudible] >> yes. >> one more document. >> let's see. where are you? >> you can see it up here. i have a hard copy of it. he, se

us here. >> reporter: the protestors became quiet after the bluford family was given the police report regarding their son's death. the report is heavily redacted but the family says it proves despise initial reports alan bluford never fired a shot. now in terms of how the city plans to operate future city council meetings, they are not sure how they will handle them from here on out. >>> oakland officials are blast the in a new report of an officer-involved shooting. the court-appointed monitor checking police reform says police sometimes shoot at suspects even if there is no imminent threat. the monitor report says police investigations into the shootings often fell short with detectives expecting that they were justified >>> a mystery in san jose. what happened to a biker who disappeared two weeks ago. family and friends held a vigil last night to pray for the safe return of 32-year-old eric dean garcia. he was last seen september 18th leaving a friend's house two blocks from his own home. he got a phone call, said he would be right back and left on his motorcycle, never returned. >>> family members of two fishermen who disappeared sunday ha

individual names were redacted by whom gave fox these e-mails but some position descriptions were not removed. you know, the state department uses letters to designate individual positions. so for example, this e-mail says, s, specialties assistance. s is the denominator for the secretary of state. so secretary clinton's special assistants got the e-mail in realtime. it goes on to say, d, b. that is the deputy secretary of state, bill burns, the number two official. goes on like that. i won't go through the whole list but what this shows absolutely the top level of the state department was getting these e-mails and in any state department i've ever been in, if the special assistants to the secretary are getting e-mails saying ansar al-sharia has taken credit for this terrorist attack, you better believe they would be putting it on her desk. and i think that's, it's also applicable to what we can see from the other e-mails that the director of national intelligence office got them, the national security staff in the executive office of the president, the pentagon, the fbi, were all getting e-mails in realtime. so the recipients o

redact -- the patriot act. the moral background questions are probably more influential in the way people think then knowledge of the issues. if you use a background belief questions, you will find libertarian's do care more about civil liberties than conservatives. there is one question about closing guantanamo bay. it was surprising how many libertarian tea partiers were willing to accept that and versus conservatives, who wanted to keep it open. it was sort of surprising. >> the gentleman right here, the one inside. sigyn from the left. and it will get to the other person. >> jim harpole with the cato institute. i would be happy to hear anyones observations. and what i debate with my friend on the left about regulation cannot -- about regulation, they often use a mental model that if this time we elect the right people and other regulators do it right, we can come up with something good. we have been doing for 40 years now and it has not happened. but what i am recognizing is that there is an aspiration of model that they are using. i wonder if you had come across this in some of your questions, as far as the escaping poverty and b