strategic trust. according to a chinese saying without trust one can achieve nothing. china and the united states have important interwoven interests. for us strategic trust is a foundation for mutual beneficial cooperation and greater trust will thread broader cooperation. the two sides should increase mutual understanding and trust and reduce misunderstanding and suspicion. president obama has stated on a number of occasions that the united states while is strong and prosperous and successful china plays a greater role in global affairs. vice president biden stressed in an article after his visit to china last august that china's rise is not america's demise. we in china hope network with the u.s. side to maintain close high level exchanges. we hope to increase dialogue and exchange views with the united states by making full use of our channels of communication including the strategic economic dialogue, cultural and people to people exchanges and military to military exchanges. by doing so we can better appreciate each other's strategic development goals, avoid misinterpretation misjudgment and build up understanding and build up trust

us people which are. a corporation and i understand first are a corporation particular we must intense by a natural strategic mutual trust between try and on the u.s. so we chase ever a key factor for promoting. the first or a corporation to turn to come trace or write down the certainly into some nice understanding in terms of also teach us. and the also about the rising palmer china so i think we start she will have a very intensive discussions always also with us of president obama and also for us uk a members often either shape to how to show. promotes their relationship to k. countries course the word. deputy director of the center for international monetary research and ram university thank you very much for being with us live from. beijing this hour thank you. well as international pressure on iran mounts russia's military has assessed the probability of a western strike against the islamic republic as being high concerns of pending military action grew after israel blamed tehran for two bomb attacks on its diplomatic staff on monday peter all over is following developments. the chief of staff of the russian armed

us their trust. and we take that very seriously. regret regrettably, this strategic shift will effect any number of longstanding partners. but we have always done what is right for our organization, for our donors and volunteers. we will never bow to political pressure. we will always stand firm in our goal to end breast cancer forever. we will never turn our backs on the women who need us the most. megyn: what she's saying is that the organization is now barring support for organizations who are under government investigation no matter who those organizations are. and in this case that includes planned parenthood. joining me now to discuss it, sandy can rios, vice president of family pac federal and a fox news contribute e and also here jeff knew green, a fox news contributor. thank you so much for being here. you know, this raises a lot of tough issues, and the susan g. komen foundation is getting slammed for doing this because while they say it's because they no longer want to give money to any group that's under goth investigation, it turns out that out of the 2,

trust that s but will expect more of us in return. >> the u.s. wants to be able to send fewer resources to areas where you're already has a presence. that is not just a strategic consideration. it is also an economic one. being the world's only policeman is getting too expensive for the u.s. and now we may have a sovereign debt crisis in europe, but public debt in the u.s. is worse. the u.s. simply can no longer afford to be the stabilizing force in two regions. >> military strategy in the u.s. is focusing increasingly on china. beijing has acquired a lot of military hardware in recent years. it is involved in territorial disputes with countries allied to the u.s. over island's rich in fuel deposits. >> the question is whether china will act like what we call a responsible member of the international community, keeping to the conventions of politics and diplomacy and whether it will take on the role within international institutions that america expects it to take. >> the u.s. plans to up its presence in asian countries like singapore and vietnam. experts are not surprised that the u.s. military is turning its attention away from europe. >> western politicians

strategic arms reduction treaty that includes significant reductions in the nuclear weapons that we will deploy it cuts or delivery vehicles by roughly half that includes a comprehensive verification regime which allows us to further build trust. that would be president obama speaking in prague when he signed a historic new start treaty pledging to reduce our nuclear arsenal to five thousand warheads far more than we would need to blow the world into smithereens five times over so if we're trying to reduce our nuclear arsenal but we possibly want this facility for all those who supported continual bleeding of the american taxpayer say that it needs to be built to quote support current nuclear weapons stockpiles through surveillance and life extension programs. small little tidbit though the project on government oversight guess is that it will be operational until two thousand and twenty three long after those current nuclear warheads will be supporting will have gone through scheduled life extension programs meaning of this facility literally serves no purpose and yet if the government continues to fund it the taxpayers will spend up to six billion dollars on it now obama has made the reduction of the nuclear arsenal a state