of 25 people britain 's prince harry must stand trial declares the world remembers near the us supreme court, near the capitol, an action is being held on the occasion of the two-year anniversary of the navigator of the congress building. change of grim's hairstyle and stage image, the five finalists will continue to amaze the audience in the factor buy project. the orthodox of the whole world met the nativity of christ one of the main and most bright holidays of the church calendar and representatives of the largest authoritative denomination in belarus, head of state alexander lukashenko congratulated orthodox christians on the holiday. this is a wonderful time when the hearts of millions of believers are warmed by the magic of one of the brightest christian holidays. we feel the unity of a completely orthodox world. we are filled with a special feeling of belonging to the great mystery and we prove our faith with good deeds for the belarusians. the main christian values, sincere love for wisdom and openness of mercy were the true guiding star, knowing firsthand the price of peace and harm

against the education committee and in fact the us supreme court had a state court decision kansas about separate education. yes , from this moment begins the process of 10 aggregation, that is, the joint training of whites and blacks. as you understand, this process was very painful and took a long time. here are the events of 1957. in the state of arkansas , it refers specifically to. e. these events on the formation of organza were developed programs for 10 aggregation, but they were rather largely reduced. that is, if it was originally planned that all schoolchildren would study within the framework of two schools together, then, then still stopped. find only ten students, that is, it was assumed that in the fall of 1900, but in the fifty- seventh year. will the first 10 black teenagers go? uh, in uh, respectively, the school, which before that was a school only for black teenagers, came to the first lesson, a russian tuned crowd was waiting for them. the guys, in general, surrounded, poured various verbal insults into them, spat on them, pushed them, but the biggest surprise, probab

this is the decision of the us supreme court in 2015 legalizing same-sex marriage.ll americans were then literally told, the next we do not care. whatever you want, we don't care who you voted for, we'll get every state in america to accept same-sex marriage. and what happens two men want to sleep with each other. and we should call it family. i believe that the family is the foundation of society. it is here that children learn what it means to be a citizen of the country. and what it's like to be part of a certain culture, it's all about the family, and if you destroy the family, then you strike at the very foundation of society. imagine that society stands on a foundation. if you take away this foundation, you will destroy the whole society. and when they hit the family, when they made the rule that we have to accept same-sex marriages. i said america will go. i don't know if it's going to happen in 5-20 or 50 years, but america will collapse in just a couple of months in september. 2015 i received a russian visa and flew to russia alone for the first time and be

he was the inaugural chief justice of the us supreme court. he was president the continental congress during the war. he was secretary of foreign affairs after the war, and he negotiated two of the nation's most important early treaties, the 1783 piece of paris that confirmed our independence and the 1795 treaty with great britain that bears his name, the jay treaty, to this nature, to this day. he's also one of the principal authors of new york's first constitution and one of the leading advocates of the ratification of the us constitution in this state. and as i already mentioned, he was a two term governor of new york, his anti-slavery resume is not quite as spectacular, but really important. as i said, was the first president of, the new york manumission society, one of the first anti-slavery societies in the western world. he was governor, as i mentioned, when new york passed its gradual emancipate in law in 1799, freeing children born to enslaved mothers. after july 4th, 1799. but those children were required to serve their mother's mast

protest in the southern state of cannot take our last year began after the government ban in the us. supreme court still needs to decide on the matter, but for many muslim students in the country, it's a matter of personal choice. didn't move in is getting her masters in communication. and jamie amelia is lamar university in delhi. she started wearing the he job about 7 years ago and is one of 3 women in her class who do so. you know, she believes that women across the world, irrespective of their religion, should have the right to choose what they want or don't want to where good us as people often stared at her. but that she has gotten used to it. it wasn't something that came to me. oh, cool family. it was something that i discovered and chose. so as the woman that i decided i was going to read her job, i think that moment it became a part of my identity and became a part of who i was last year. the southern state of cannot accost all major protest both for and against the he job. after 6 students were bought from attending classes for wearing one officials shut down schools and universities fo

fateful decision on their resolution of the very one that the supreme court overturned last year from new york yulia vasilchenko and the usallowed a woman to terminate a pregnancy until the fetus is capable of life appeared more than 50 years ago , liberals considered it a great achievement. after all, it was a response to the high mortality from illegal abortions. now the rules were in effect across the country. conservatives opposed to abortion were terribly dissatisfied, and did not threaten to reverse the decision. but then it seemed impossible everything changed. after the conservatives became the majority of the supreme court after the overturning of the decision on the case. row is against the species , abortions are now decided at the state level and in a few dozen of them abortions are banned clinics that still offer these services are in high demand only from medical process the procedure has turned into self-medication used to be a joke about abortion on the phone. now they are being made online. and this is no longer a joke during the tv series. doctors explain how to take the pills correctly, which should lea

the odds of the us supreme court to hear your case. >> the odds are extremely small you will be heard they are petitioned with between eight and 10000 cases every year the only grant between 70 or 80 and it has to be to circuit if they ruled differently that is the split so they have to justify that the constitution can't be one thing in california and another in california so they are dealing with larger cases like that and in my case they come from the district court or any large thing which was a stand-alone case in coming from a court of appeals but the odds are incredibly against us so they have to go over every aspect and the energy it takes and we got that. >> what did it feel like when you are going to the supreme court? >> the greatest day of my life there is a website you can follow any case that you are looking at which means they had in front of them and talked about it put it off so i knew it was talked about every weekend through the court session where they break through the summer i was watching my computer and offerin

this comes one month before the us supreme court is scheduled to take up the case.there's always a fresh deal on the subway app. like this one! 50% off?! that deal's so good we don't even need an eight-time all-star to tell you about it. wait what? get it before it's gone on the subway app! a third day without approving a new speaker of the house in 11 votes. california congressman kevin mccarthy has failed to reach the threshold to take the gavel that is the most ballot cast in most balanced cast in this normally pro former election since before the civil war, a solid core of some 20 republicans say they will continue to oppose mccarthy because he's too much of a part of part of the establishment. 12th vote could take place as early as noon tomorrow. within the next 24 hours for what i hear, and i repeat, everything could change that. he will have an agreement with the 16 17, or 18 of the holdout. there had been talks of reaching across the aisle to cut a deal on a compromise candidate. but that idea got little traction on the floor. democrats stand united again. o

but uthe supreme court has given us a chance to start again. with new life, with the right new life. so the supreme court i think is going to veplay an even greater role in life over the next couple of years. in politics i should say in of the next couple of years. and that combined with the house of representatives being in control of that, joe and jill won't be running as badly as they have the next two years. that's my prediction . yes it's a pleasure meeting you. it's a pleasure writing about what you're up against with the democratic party. you seem to know them very well . i think everyone in thisroom, most everyone wants donald trump to be our next president . so i say to myself, what is he up against t? i hear the news quite often and we hear about ron desantis. i get the feeling democrats want donald trump and ron desantis to fight and i wish that doesn't happen. i wish maybe somehow someway these two egocentric people, let their egos go down and team together. so maybe as leslie says why do democrats always get along, we never hear the

so this is us supreme court. whatsapp us supreme court.e group pursue pegasus spyware laws whether laws and it's a debate whether this are something this nso are doing something dodgy they say dodgy or helpful. now they say that sort of captive that that held sort of captive and they had information on the khashoggi incident and things like this but the journalist for the washington post, he was murdered in saudi arabia. but the argument against is, well, you be spying people you shouldn't be spying people via whatsapp and basically the supreme court upheld the lawsuit that you can't get immunity just because their argument was that they were acting as an agent for an foreign government, which sounds to me just like, hey, guys, we were like, this is ages for governments. we've never seen or heard of working for. spector don't know who spector yeah, we don't know who is. pegasus fire is pretty serious stuff because it can it can get into your phone it can turn itself on and film things without your knowledge. you can listen without listen i

you think about after the us supreme court gutted the voting rights act in the 2013 decision and you had this slew of votersuppression lost . they were so intense that in the 2016 election black voter turnout down by seven percent . that would have been enough to go well but no, organizations mobilized. and you saw this massive voter turnout in the midterms and in 2020. we're also seeing like white rage, the policies being pushed back to go no, we're not having that. you're also seeing mobilization so my hope that is folks won't capitulate to my hope is really resting on a history of fighting for democracy. fighting for a vibrant, real democracy. that's where my hopes are. >> before we let you go, i'll tell everybody that professor anderson's family is from right here in oklahoma so it's a bit of avirtual homecoming . more of the central part of the state around the oklahoma city area and some of those places but i hope that at some point we will get you to visit here in person and i can't tell you what a powerful experience book was and i wish you the best with. i encourage all you

supreme court. i the supreme court. the supreme court are going to continue to make good decisions, patriotic decisions. the right moral decisions. i mean, it's amazing this us supreme court delivered, by the way, by donald trump and let's give you credit where credit is due. mitch mcconnell, who really did hold his nerve to help that assist that situation becoming a reality. but wait, the court has given us a chance to start again with life, with the right to life. so the supreme court, i think, is going to play an even greater role in life over the next couple of years. in politics i should say, in the next couple of years and that combined with the house of representatives being in control of that job and jill won't be sleeping as soundly as they have over the last two years. that's my prediction. yes, ma'am. good evening. good evening. adams, a pleasure meeting you. it's a pleasure about your knowledge, about what we're up against with the democratic party. you seem to know them very well. so i think everyone here in this room, most everyone here wants trump to be our next president. yes. yes, yes. so i say to myself. what, is he up against? so i hear th

anyway, the congress punted to the us supreme court. your supreme court was eight republicans and seven democrats, and so you can guess how that came out. they voted 827 to give the election to rutherford b hayes, who had lost the popular vote by a wide margin. and the only saving grace was is wasn't an awful president. and he had pledged to run only one term and he only ran one term. and he also was immortalized in uruguay as a great american president because. he refereed a a a war between uruguay and argentina. and in fact, for a while there was a district in uruguay that was named hayes, and there was a stamp with him on it. so he was a great deal more popular in uruguay than he was in the united states. anything. yeah, i the you're picking a year 1876 is is an interesting is very interesting because you know there's so many years, i guess that could be picked right like bill bryson did the summer of 1910 1927. it was an example, you know, and the idea of so many things happening at once is great. have you thought about any other ye

anyway, the congress punted to the us supreme court. your supreme court was eight republicans and seven democrats, and so you can guess how that came out. they voted 827 to give the election to rutherford b hayes, who had lost the popular vote by a wide margin. and the only saving grace was is wasn't an awful president. and he had pledged to run only one term and he only ran one term. and he also was immortalized in uruguay as a great american president because. he refereed a a a war between uruguay and argentina. and in fact, for a while there was a district in uruguay that was named hayes, and there was a stamp with him on it. so he was a great deal more popular in uruguay than he was in the united states. anything. yeah, i the you're picking a year 1876 is is an interesting is very interesting because you know there's so many years, i guess that could be picked right like bill bryson did the summer of 1910 1927. it was an example, you know, and the idea of so many things happening at once is great. have you thought about any other ye

this leak led to an assassination attempt on a sitting us supreme court justice.it is also led to security problems for all of the justices who voted or who ruled on in dobbs. this is such an important issue to get right. and justice chief justice roberts did not seem to take it very seriously. it was very lax investigation. the marshal of the supreme court didn't seem to have the skills required. an outside firm was consulted, but not anything near the level of what should have happened. if you really wanted to determine conclusively who did this, we found out in the reporting, molly, that a few of those interviewed by the marshals office in the investigation admitted to having told their spouses about the draft opinion, which is a no no. i know your lectured the moment you walk into that court. you cannot tell anyone, spouse, friend, doctor , therapist, anyone about what happens inside the court. they had to annotate their affidavits to that effect. and there are so many clerks who take that very seriously and would never disclose anything. this is why it's almo

mike, i know you are calling into us, thank you for jumping on. the supreme courtort appears to reveal that it has been unable to identify the person who leaked this unpublished draft of the opinion indicating the court was poised to roll back abortion rights. what can you tell us now that you have had a chance to look at that report? >> well, i do want to commend the chief justice and the marshal and the supreme court for putting out this 20-page report. they are being very transparent here, unusually transparent for the federal judiciary, it's disappointing they did not find the person who leaked the draft dobbs decision, but maybe it should not surprise us. the person who leaked this is obviously lying to these investigators because the investigators interviewed all the employees within the supreme court who had access to the draft dobbs decision, including the law clerks. there are four law clerks for each of the nine supreme court justices. so they interviewed all of these law clerks along with the permanent staff. someone is clearly lying here, someone leaked

abc's terry moran has covered the supreme court for years for us. >> reporter: the supreme court leak that shocked the country sparked an urgent question. who did it? who broke the court's hallowed tradition of secrecy? today, the court announced that after an eight-month investigation, the leaker of justice samuel alito's draft opinion overturning roe versus wade has not been identified. the marshal of the court, gail curley, said investigators had conducted 126 interviews of 97 court employees, under penalty of perjury, determined that it was unlikely the court's i.t. systems had been hacked, but that several employees had told their spouses or partners of the ruling. still the leaker remains unidentified. in the storm of protests after the leak, many conservatives argued the leak must have come from liberals at the court trying to sabotage the abortion ruling before it was handed down, while liberals argued it was court conservatives trying to lock in wavering justices. to this day, some of the justices say the damage from the leak is permanent. >> it was beyond anyone's understand

supreme court. we were willing to do that but was the court willing to hear our case was the big question. >> apparently the court was willing to hear your case. tell us what the odds are of the supreme court hearing your case. >> the odds are extremely small that they will be heard. they are petitioned with 8,000 to 10,000 cases every year and grab 70 or 80 of them and they have to be usually like circuit courts ninth circuit and a fourth circuit ruled differently different r things so that's called a circuit split and they have to justify that. it can't mean one thing in california and another in florida. it has to be the same across the board. so they are dealing with larger cases like that. and for my case, we came from malik circuit court or district court or any large thing just kind of a standalone case and basically coming from a court of appeals so we didn't make it to the state supreme court but the odds are incredibly against us. you have to have four justices agreed to take the case, so they all for at least had to go over every aspect of the case to make sure it's worth their time and effort and energy that it would take to take the case

however, the us supreme court ultimately decided that states were not to pay or refund abortions foredicaid recipients, and at the amendment did not violate women's constitutional rights. as a result. many other individual states to follow this course and according to one report, within a year of the implementation of the hyde amendment, the number of federally funded abortions dropped from about 290000 to 2000. the center for disease control even conducted an eight month longitudinal study to determine the effects on restricting access public funds for abortion. the study had some flaws. it was small. there were other issues that affected its interpretations, but they did find that medicaid women in non funded states who had complications after abortions, they averaged about 1.9 weeks later gestational than their counterparts in states that were funded and medicaid eligible women in non funded states had a 2.4 week later mean age the non medicaid women in the same state. so what that basically means is that women who were on medicaid who had to wait longer save money to get abortion

back and forth of policy decision making about environmental regulations, for example, in the us supreme court ruling. in 2022 or the selling off of the amazon rain in brazil. right. the threat is global and i think we can be forgiven if not entire entire supported in our concern for the future of what progress means and what exactly is going to yield for humankind collectively in the end. so how do saw this coming already 50 years ago in the mid 1970s, more generally what we find is that humankind cannot or at least has not been able to keep up with the broader balance to achieve some kind of equilibrium relative to the longer term issues of progress, of history. in other words, unless we assume we're living in the end times right now, pretty daunting. then there's still a ahead of us. there's still trajectory to be pursued and progressive history, if we choose to see that way as. an unfolding, continuing process leading toward better and better instincts. sadat's point is that we haven't reached that final endpoint at all. there's still clearly so much more to do now, even if we were to buy

so this is us supreme let's whatsapp us supreme court. pegasus spyware laws debate whether laws and it's a debate whether this doing something laws and it's a debate whether this or doing something laws and it's a debate whether this or helpful.g something laws and it's a debate whether this or helpful. nownething laws and it's a debate whether this or helpful. now they1g laws and it's a debate whether this or helpful. now they say dodgy or helpful. now they say that sort of captive that that held sort of captive and they had information on the khashoggi incident and things like this but the journalist for the washington post, he was murdered in saudi arabia. but the argument against is, well, murdered in saudi arabia. but the shouldn't against is, well, murdered in saudi arabia. but the shouldn't beainst is, well, murdered in saudi arabia. but the shouldn't be spying well, murdered in saudi arabia. but the shouldn't be spying people you shouldn't be spying people via whatsapp and basically the supreme court upheld the lawsuit that you ca