obviously, worst-case scenario for them would have been if the supreme court denied this and then that case would have been able to know the us supreme appeals court got it, right? >> yeah. it would've been a disaster and after that unanimous ruling came out from the appeals court, they were not sure what the supreme court was going to decide here because it was well argued, it was unanimous and it kinda put the the trump team on their backfoot in the sense of what was going to happen here, you can't really predict, but they feel that this is at least a win for now. we're hearing from them. definitely. of course, it remains to be seen what this looks like with the expedited basis, but this is exactly to their game plan, to what evan was saying there from katelyn polantz, what we've been hearing is that what they would like to do? obviously slight delay. delay. delay has been their entire legal strategy, but is to get that documents case in florida push just enough to where if they lose on the merits here and they fully expect that they will lose on the merits and the sense of this they make no bones about that but it doesn't

obviously worst-case scenario for them would have been if the supreme court denied this and then that case would have been able to know the us supreme appeals court got it right? >> yeah. it would have been a disaster. and after that unanimous ruling came out from the appeals court, they were not sure what the supreme court was going to decide here because it was well argued, it was unanimous and it kind of put the trump team on their backfoot in the sense of what was going to happen here, you can't really predict, but they feel that this is at least a win for now. we're hearing from them of course, it remains to be seen what this looks like with the expedited basis, but this is exactly to their game plan, to what evan was saying there from katelyn polantz, what we've been hearing is that what they would like to do? obviously delay they delay delay has been their entire legal strategy, but is to get that documents case in florida push just enough to where if they lose on the merits here and they fully expect that they will lose on the parents in the sense of this, they make no bones about that. but it doesn't matter because

stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a - stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a case _ . stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a case of— - stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a case of whether - . stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a case of whether or- - stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a case of whether or not i court hears a case of whether or not to keep donald trump off the 2024 presidential ballot. the anti—war candidate planning to challenge vladimir putin is blocked from standing in russia's presidential election. boris nadezhdinjoins us live on today's programme. vote counting begins in the pakistan election after a campaign marred by violence. in the uk, the labour opposition ditches its multi—billion pound green policy on the day the eu releases another worrying climate report. and it's at it again — volcano in iceland erupts for the third time since december. welcome to the show. we start in washington, where the us supreme court is hearing a case, that could potentially stop donald trump running in the 2024 presidential ele

i also want to get some reaction to the us supreme court's decision. we're getting reaction from former president trump, cnn's kristen holmes is standing by. she's got details for us. so trump just reacted. i take it grist it on social media yeah, he just posted before i read it, i do want to note one thing i talked to members of his team and to some of his allies who also the same thing. they were extremely pleased currently with this decision. now that was twofold. one, because they wanted to present to their immunity argument, even though many of his advisers and allies actually don't believe that this is going to hold up in court. they were happy you to get to present it. the other part of this is that delay, delay, delay. they believe that now it is very, very likely that they are going to delay this past the november election, which is of course, what their goal has been all along. so this is what donald trump posted on social media, and it just i just tone it down. give me one second. >> to pull it back up for you. okay. >> he says legal scholars

the us supreme court hears a case _ this case. the us supreme court hears a case on _ this case. s a case on whether colorado can block donald trump from the ballot in the 2024 presidential election in the state. though counting gets under way in a tabular general election in pakistan. —— the vote counting gets under way in the general election in pakistan. joe biden has defended his handling of documents in special counsel investigation and his fitness for leading the country. there was an announcement today that he wilfully retained and disclosed

the us supreme court considers a case that could change how social media firms moderate content onlineheard arguments in two cases today which could change the way firms moderate social media content. at issue are laws in texas and florida that put restrictions on how platforms like facebook, youtube and x look at material. michelle flori said this report. forseveral michelle flori said this report. for several hours, justices from the highest court questioned aspects of

the us supreme court hears a case _ this case. the us supreme court hears a case on _ this case. e us supreme court hears a case on whether - hears a case on whether colorado can block donald trump from the ballot in the 2024 presidential election in the state. though counting gets under way in a tabular general election in pakistan. —— the vote counting gets under way in the general election in pakistan. joe biden has defended his handling of documents in special counsel investigation and his fitness for leading the country. there was an announcement today that he wilfully retained and disclosed classified documents on matters including national security, which stems back to 2017 and his role as vice president. the special council has decided not to pursue criminal charges against mr biden. he said he opted against criminal charges because mr biden co—operated with his investigation and guilt could not be established beyond a reasonable doubt. mr biden previously admitted that a handful of documents were filed in the wrong place, and said that he had immediately turned them over

the us supreme court heard arguments in two cases today which could change the way america regulatesutube and x police online material. michelle fleury sent this report. for several hours, justices from the highest court questioned aspects of legislation passed in florida and texas that limit what social media platforms can do to moderate content.

that is an issue that the us supreme court is looking at. and now there are three states that say donald trump is ineligible to be voted for in their state's primary elections that are upcoming illinois. a court decided last night that donald trump is ineligible. he will be able to appeal that and potentially put that on hold as the state continues to work things out. but the us supreme court is looking at whether courts in colorado and illinois are able to do this and whether the people who run elections in the state of maine are also able to remember hoover trump from the ballot or throw out votes for him. so that's on the lawsuit side, and his eligibility related to the insurrection calling him an insurrectionist and votes toward the presidency on the criminal case side, that's where the us supreme court has now said they are going to be weighing questions of presidential immunity if there's a bubble around donald trump that protects him from criminal charges and prevents him from going to trial in his obstruction case related to the 2020

supreme court. thank you, graham satchell, for us, at _ the supreme court. . thank you, graham satchell, for us, at the court _ the supreme court. thank you, graham satchell, for us, at the court of- satchell, for us, at the court of appeal. stay with us, you are watching bbc news. good morning. it was a chilly start. first thing, frost across parts of scotland and that's because we've changed our air mass here in the uk. the atlantic air has departed. now it's across scandinavia, that deep area of low pressure. and instead we've got this chillier air with us over the next couple of days. to put that in context for the best part of a week and a half now, we've had temperatures into the teens and yesterday saw them dip back down closer to the february average. and that's what is with us for the next couple of days. feeling chilly because of the brisk wind today, which is bringing a lot of showers to northern western scotland, northern ireland, western parts of england along with wales, wintry over the hills, the best of the sunshine, the drier weather further

the us supreme court heard arguments in two cases today which could change the way america regulatesal. what can people say here or read online? over several hours, justices from america's highest court questioned aspects of legislation passed in florida and texas that limits what social media plait formats can do to moderate content. these laws were introduced after the siege of the capitol on january introduced after the siege of the capitol onjanuary 6 which led to former president donald trump being removed

the us supreme court is considering a case that could change how social media firms moderate contenti'm steve lai. the us supreme court heard arguments in two lawsuits today which could shape the way america regulates social media. at issue are laws in texas and florida that put restrictions on how platforms like facebook, youtube and x police online material. 0ur north america business correspondent michelle fleury filed this report. what can people say, hear or read online? for several hours, justices from america's highest court questioned aspects of legislation passed in florida and texas that limits what social media platforms can do to moderate content. now, these laws were introduced after the siege of the capitol onjanuary 6, which led to former president donald trump being removed from several social media networks. supporters of the law argued that it was necessary to prevent censorship of conservative users,

decision from illinois, it hops on board of what the colorado the supreme court has already done and said that case that now is up at the us supreme court where colorado was that state through the court system, looked at the evidence around january 6, and deemed donald trump to be an insurrectionist and someone ineligible to be on the ballot for president. illinois says exactly this same thing here. >> okay, so now illinois coming, and as i said, in a surprise move saying this as this the broader question about the 14th amendment's in front of the supreme court. so what does this mean for that? what happens next? kaitlan? >> aaron donald trump's team is going to need to move quickly to appeal that is the first thing that's laid out here. they have two days as according to this order to get everything paused, having him removed from the ballot are having votes in the march 19 primary not counted for him? so they got to go to the appeals court in illinois for two days. the state is going to continue to look at it and then so much is at stake at the us supreme court. they already are looking at what colorado did to remove him

the us supreme court hears a case on whether colorado can block donald trump from the ballot in the state's 2024 presidential election. vote counting is under way in a turbulent general election in pakistan. researchers in the uk are carrying out tests to try and find out why hundreds of thousands of people across the country have a stammer. hello, i'm lukwesa burak. us presidentjoe biden has angrily rejected suggestions that he has a poor memory and is unfit for office. he was responding to a long—awaited report which concluded he shouldn't face any criminal charges for mishandling classified documents during his time as vice president, but questioned his ability to remember several important events. the initial headlines seemed to be good news for the president. the special counsel recommended no charges be brought into his handling of official documents. a legal win for mr biden. but politically, it was a devastating blow. the report made several claims over his mental competency, describing him as a well—meaning elderly man with a poor memory. in any future trial, it said, it would be d

but a lot is going to depend there on what the us supreme court decides. if trump can be eligible for the ballot. he is being deemed an insurrectionist by courts in both the states of illinois and colorado at this time. and they say that the presidency is part of this, that he can meet, be not eligible for the presidency. and then john, there's the criminal situation that is the presidential immunity claim that the us supreme court also is going to be looking at in the coming months that has derailed his federal case, donald trump's federal case related to the 2020 election. it's a charge of obstruction and conspiracy, and that is something that will be in the supreme court's hands until they decide potentially by the end of the term it's right they will decide they'll hear the case in april. it could be weeks, if not until june when they rule and then people are trying to figure out if and when the case could get before judge tanya tucker and assuming the supreme court allows it to go on. so there's that which people have talked about ad nauseam the last

the us supreme court agrees to rule on whether donald trump can be prosecuted on charges of trying to putin is to deliver his annual address to the nation, weeks before an upcoming election that's expected to secure him another 6 years in office. south korea threatens legal action against thousands of striking doctors — as a deadline looms for them to return to work. and from devastation to oscar hope — we bring you the ukrainian film, 20 days in mariupol, the favourite to win the best documentary. hello, i'm sally bundock. a very warm welcome to the programme. the us supreme court has agreed to decide if former president donald trump can be prosecuted on charges of trying to overturn the 2020 us presidential election. a court of appeals panel has already rejected mr trump's argument that he has presidential immunity. arguments in the case have been scheduled for late april. 0ur north america correspondent peter bowes sent this update.

and the us supreme court hears arguments in two landmark cases about social media censure, that could affect freedom of speech online for millions. hello, i'm caitriona perry. france's president emmanual macron signaled he isn't ruling out sending western troops to ukraine, after meeting european leaders in paris. macron declined to provide details about which nations were considering sending troops, saying he prefers to maintain some strategic ambiguity. it's the first time there has been such an open discussion of western nations collectively looking at providing troops to support the ukrainian military — which has struggled on the battlefield in recent months. mr macron warned russia is looking to take more terrority and presents a danger beyond ukraine. translation: there is no - consensus today to send ground troops in an official, endorsed and sanctioned manner but in dynamic terms, nothing should be ruled out. we will do whatever it takes to ensure that russia cannot win this war. european leaders agreed to increase funding for ukraine in its war against russia. mr macron says

i all the us supreme court has been hearing arguments in a case that could have major implications for the upcoming presidential election. colorado supreme court ruled that donald trump is not eligible candidates because of his actions during the journey, the 6 capital, right. it's now up to the nation's highest court to decide if that we should spend, she have or types of impulse. the supreme court has a conservative majority, 6 conservative justices, the 3 liberals. but it wasn't just those appointed by republican presidents who question the colorado supreme court ruling for donald trump was ineligible to run for president. using section 3 of the 14th amendment of the constitution, the balls those have engaged an insurrection to a games for us from holding 7 offices. colorado's highest quote, have ruled at donald trump should be removed from the balance because its opinion, his actions on january the 6th did amount to insurrection. but this argument was greeted with skepticism. thursday's hearing, his liberal justice elena kagan. i think that's the question that you have to confront

the us supreme court hears a case on whether colorado can block donald trump from the ballot in the 2024on in the state. vote counting gets under way in a turbulent general election in pakistan. i'm helena humphrey, good to have you with us. we begin in washington. us presidentjoe biden has defended not only his handling of classified documents at the centre of the justice department investigation but also his fitness for the job leading the country. earlier the day, the person leading the investigation into his handling of documents said, he wilfully

what described to this piece each, having significant limitations us supreme court considers whether donald trump should be checked off of the presidential palace, the state of colorado, the results of the get into come into focus stones general elections that followed by phonics accusations of the causes, ministry of health, so 17 people have been killed by is very smart for 5 since thursday morning. medical stuff at nasa hospice when calling you this. i've been targeted. it's very snow. i pressed the tooth of shooting at doctors, and this is an operating with $37840.00 palestinians have been killed in gauze since october. the 2nd with the center for while dr. new side was on duty in the operation room at elm. that's the medical complex. he was deliberately shopped by a sniper from the occupation forces. he sustained a gunshot wound to the chest that is currently in critical condition. the danger now extends to medical personnel while they are performing the jew things. it's no longer just displaced individuals and patients being targeted, even doctors and now the talking about comp

the us supreme court has agreed to hear donald trump's claim of immunity from prosecution for trying to overturn the 2020 election results. the judges are expected to hear legal arguments in late april trumps lawyers say going to trial would radically disrupt the former president's re election campaign. trump is also facing 3 other criminal cases to and a judge in illinois is removed from, from the states republican primary valid on march. the 19th, the decision is on hold until friday, giving trumps lawyers time to appeal. the same ruling was made by courts and both colorado and maine, the colorado case, has been appealed to the supreme court. meanwhile, joe biden is at his annual physical exam, and his doctor say he's in their words fit for duty. speaking later and an event with poor, with police leaders, joe biden joked with the journalist that they thought he looked too young. the oldest president and us history is running for re election in november, just before his 82nd birthday. the still ahead on al jazeera mexico faces election violence before the campaign as even officially

us. this part of the constitution, as it applies to - constitution, as it applies to presidents, has simply never been argued before the supreme courtver tried to use this part, the 14th amendment, section three of the constitution, to prevent someone from becoming president, so we are in completely uncharted legal territory. we must talk about colorado today, but make no mistake, if donald trump loses this case and is not on the ballot in colorado, that will have repercussions right across the country, notjust in the primaries for the republican nomination, but also for the general election. that could throw this whole year, this whole electoral process into absolute chaos. and i think we would have no idea where that might end up. so it really is that might end up. so it really is that important today. we will hear the arguments on both sides, we will hear donald trump's lawyers say this part of the constitution does not apply to the presidency, that donald trump that did not engage in insurrection in any case, that free speech protected what he did when he did speak at that rally ahead of january six. all those arguments will be

supreme court of our country? it's unlikely that this particular alabama decision would go to the us supreme court because they basedolding on state law . >> and so there isn't a obvious vehicle for to get it up to the us supreme court. >> as for the law in alabama, now that the supreme court in alabama upheld what would be done? i mean, you're saying that this law was passed, that this ruling was made many, many years ago, decades ago, over a century ago? well yes. >> the law that this court was interpreting is the wrongful death of a minor act. it was passed in 1872, and as the dissent points out, the legislature at that time certainly didn't envision in, um, in vitro fertilization and frozen embryos as something that could even exist, let alone be under this act. and the legislature of alabama, of course, is free to modify the act or amend it to say it does not apply to frozen embryos outside the uterus. currently um, legislators in alabama, some are looking into that. so it could be changed through legislation, legislation there. >> all right. so what are your thoughts, judge hallgren, of seeing all this play ou

us. we begin in the united states with some breaking news. the supreme courtarges involve mr trump's efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss. but the supreme court's decision to take up the case could delay it beyond the election in november.

the us supreme court has donald trump's appeal against being removed from colorado's presidential prime. we balance the thanks for joining us these way. the army is bombing rough gauze, the southern most any of the border with egypt is supposed to be the last remaining, save some of them. but if you want to publish them, used to leave all the areas of the strip. at least 14 people have been killed and some of the latest attacks on homes that didn't cause the city of the nor fee is right. the army is again opened fire on pa, this thing is ways to receive the monetary and aid that'd be multiple reports of similar attacks in the past week. agencies of also accused is ready forces of blocking aid for palestinians. a summer pinch of age begins coverage. the real well how much i didn't hear your voice for so many days. she says. but he's among the 10s of thousands of palestinians in silence for the bodies kept coming as to more residential areas, but targeted by his reading forces. ready now, i swear to god, there is no safety. i should hon. units to enough. and here they bumped us in rough u

the us supreme court even took biden’s side, declaring that the actions of state security forces weremply with the court’s decision, and the regional prosecutor refused. i think that's what it is, i mean they take a federal law and override it, he has a constitutional duty to carry out what was put in place by the elected representatives, yes, but he just doesn't do it, along the way establishes affairs their own rules that allow the cartels to gain a foothold, a strong, real strong foothold in the united states, not just in my state, but throughout the country. are building a network across the country to continue doing so after biden leaves. many people are really interested in the presence of holes on the border with mexico, including in the united states itself. these are drug traffickers and suppliers of illegal weapons. the goods go to the states, mainly across the land border, are successfully sold, and the profits are eaten up in the offshore areas of panama and costa rica. how to close such a golden one corridor? it is not surprising that the people of the leadership of texas

and the us supreme court hears arguments in a case that could determine whether donald trump can runresident. hello, i'm ben thompson. welcome to the programme. we begin tonight with news from ukraine, where the army chief, general valerii zaluzhnyi, who led kyiv�*s forces throughout the russian invasion has been removed from his post. in a statement, president volodymyr zelensky said it's time for some urgent changes in the military. the ministry of defence echoed that line, saying that new approaches and new strategies were needed. our russia editor at bbc monitoring and the ukrainecast presenter vitaliy shevchenko has been following developments. he gave me some background on the general who's been dimissed. valerii zaluzhnyi, to put simply, he was in charge of the ukrainian army. and as such, he was the architect of ukraine's initial counteroffensive backin ukraine's initial counteroffensive back in 2022. he is the face of ukraine's relative military success. he is credited well with the fact that ukraine's still there, still fighting, and yet he has been sacked. it's a move that

so trump wants to delay this criminal prosecution while the us supreme court considers taking up his immune immunity case, what potentially are the options that the supreme court could exercise? >> well, they could extend the stay that the trial judge put in place in the court of appeals affirmed and let this case go in the ordinary course, which could mean briefings and a decision by late june or they could keep the stay in place and take this on an expedited basis and then we'd get a ruling probably in the next six weeks to eight weeks, or they could lift this day. let the case go back to the trial, judge. and then decide whether they want to hear trump's request to have immunity be made part of the law as he sees it >> and these considerations are these considered expedited? >> might >> it be as early as this week when we might hear from the us supreme court on which direction it might go or rule >> one would hope so the way the court works is the justices meet every week or so in conference, they call it and they discuss requests for cases to be heard or emergency petitions. and i

so the other consequential us supreme court case involves trump's efforts to block a lower court appellate decision saying and he does not have immunity. so what are the options the supreme court may take here >> well, fred, on one extreme, the court could just say, we're not taking the case and we're sending it back down to the trial court in which case the trial court would be back in business and they very likely, judge chutkan, there would set a trial date, i think for as soon as she possibly could, and certainly before the 2024 election, that's the best outcome for jack smith, the best outcome for donald trump is the supreme court says, we are taking this case. we're keeping the pause on in the trial court and we're going to schedule this on the normal schedule of briefing, which would take several months and quite possibly push it out until after the election. section. there's also a middle ground potentially where the supreme court says, we are going to take this case. what we're going to expedite, we're going to speed up the briefing here, which would still allow some chance for th

the us supreme court heard arguments in two cases today which could change the way firms moderate social media content. at issue are laws in texas and florida that put restrictions on how platforms like facebook, youtube and x look at material. michelle flori said this report. forseveral michelle flori said this report. for several hours, justices from the highest court questioned aspects of legislation passed in florida and texas that limits what social media platforms can do to moderate content. —— fleury. they were proposed after the siege of the capital, which led to donald trump being removed from several social media networks. supporters of the law that it was necessary to prevent censorship of conservative users. a long—running concern among republicans. they argued they were civilly trying to regulate business behaviour, not the speech of these firms. but opponents, including the industry group challenging both laws, net choice, said they infringed on the platforms�* first amendment rights, by limiting the content they can publish and warning that a ruling for the states would de

while the us supreme cause of us appeals court said that's nonsense. and so, and the supreme court was always likely to take this case off. and there's one very good reason for that. never before has a president been charged with a criminal offense. this gets involved with important questions of constitutional law. and therefore the supreme court wanted to see that. but the fact that it's april, the 22nd means that they might not rule on it so much later, perhaps even me. and so that makes it very difficult to bring any trial before we get into the heat of the bustle of the presidential election. so donald trump will be feeling pretty good about this. jack smith will be overly happy. remember, donald trump is facing for codes in this case in dc that they tried to overtime the 2020 presidential election. and of course, there's 3 other cases and $12.00 other cases that the supreme court involving donald trump. so it's moving along but not as fast as jack smith and the government would like. but certainly at a pace the donald trump maybe more than comforta

tropez, just ask the us supreme court to weigh in on the issue of presidential immunity, whether he is immune from facing charges for any alleged crimes he committed while he was president mr. trump wants to the justices to temporary block a scathing decision handed down by the dc circuit court lasts week one that flatly rejected his claims of immunity in the federal election subversion case, one that differentiated between president trump and citizen trump let's get straight to cnn, chief legal affairs correspondent paula reid. paula tell us what's going on. >> well, as you just laid it out, jake, he is asking the supreme court to pause that appeals court ruling that found that he did not have immunity that would block him from being prosecuted. at the federal level by special counsel jack smith on charges related to election subversion. now if you talk to sources in and around the trump legal team or legal experts, they all agree this is not one of his stronger arguments. they don't expect it. ultimately, he will prevail, be granted immunity, and be shielded from this prosecution. so

the situation on the southern border has worsened after the us supreme court allowed the removal of aarbed wire fence installed by texas authorities. the head of the state refused to do this, announced an invasion and declared a state of emergency. his, by the way... joe biden is in his reluctance to protect the american border and fight against illegal migration. how the virus of separatism is growing in one of the key states of america, who calls biden and the president, and does not believe in the legitimacy of his victory in the elections, and refuses to obey decisions from the capital. how illegal immigrants became a bargaining chip in big game. whether texas is free to float, we will tell you on monday in a clear policy. machine builders are preparing for spring and summer field work this agricultural season, so the company from derzhinsk offers, among other things, innovative developments, this is a twelve-meter verros seeder, it provides high accuracy even over a wide range. norm from 1 to 400 kg per hectare. there are already agreements on the supply of three dozen different

the us supreme court hears arguments in two landmark cases about social media censure.e'll hear from a legal expert what the implications could be. as alabama supreme court rules that frozen embryos are the legal equivalent of children, many republicans distance themselves. hello. a very warm welcome to the programme. i'm sally bundock. we start with the war in gaza. us presidentjoe biden has said he hopes a ceasefire could start by the beginning of next week. negotiators are seeking a halt to the fighting and the release of israeli hostages held in gaza. here's the president speaking late on monday. my my national security adviser tells me that we close, we're close, we're not done yet. my hope is by next monday we will have a ceasefire. let's take a look at the latest on those meetings. israel and hamas have been holding so—called "proximity "talks" in qatar. there are reports that 400 palestinian prisoners, serving sentences for terror—related crimes, could be exchanged for a0 female and elderly israeli hostages. the israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu has vowe

the situation on the southern border has escalated after the us supreme court allowed the removal of barbed wire fence installed by texas authorities. the head of the state refused to do this, announced an invasion and declared a state of emergency. by the way, he is supported by 25 governorates. joe biden 's unwillingness to protect the american border to fight illegal migration. the uk is sounding the alarm due to a record rise in crime. according to the daily telegraph, almost half of the united kingdom's residents have lost confidence in the local justice system. it's all about very lenient sentences for serious crimes. another reason is that the ministry of justice’s innovation is not particularly exempt. prisoners in an attempt to ease the burden on prisons, the british are dissatisfied with the government, which is not able to control borders, so illegal migrants often join the ranks of criminals, according to the latest data only in in january, almost one and a half thousand people illegally crossed the lamge strait, the maintenance of illegal immigrants takes a heavy toll on

donald trump is taking his fight for immunity to the us supreme court cnn's chief legal affairs correspondent, paula reid, is here with us. paula today was the deadline for this filing. what are trump's attorneys now asking the us supreme court to do? >> well, they're asking the supreme court to >> pause a lower court ruling that found that trump does not have presidential immunity to shield him from the federal election subversion case. and they want that opinion to be paused because otherwise, the first federal trial against former president trump could begin in a matter of weeks now, last week, and a unanimous and scathing opinion, a three judge panel and the dc circuit court of appeals found that trump does not have immunity, and we know that the strategy for former president trump is to delay, delay, delay. they were trying everything they can to push this case back until after the november 2024 election, and they're going to exercise every option they have signaling in this new filing that they intend to appeal formally to the supreme court, but also possibly go back down to the court o

their argument today before the us supreme court. that's next vegas. >> story of sin city. sunday at ten on cnn, he introducing ned's plaque psoriasis he thinks is flaky red patches are all people see. >> oh, tesla is the number one prescribed pill to treat black psoriasis. it can help you get clear skin >> don't use a tesla if you're alerted object to it. serious allergic reactions can happen. oh, tesla may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. some people taking new tesla had depression suicidal thoughts or weight loss upper respiratory tract infection, and headache may live in the moment. >> asked your dr. about oh tesla. >> you always got your mind on the grain that you you, your business bank account with quickbooks money now or it's 5% apy >> that's how business differently >> into it quick so, would you get to nashville hot tenders and three mandarin orange tenders? >> what about you? >> three classic >> tenders for big butterfly shred for of a kind when oh, okay always, a competition. >> i am the shrimp bought what you're sap? >> that's why vision works, makes

donald trump's defense team had just gone to the us supreme court with a new filing in his challenge. he's trying to get presidential immunity asserted. we're going to bring that to you story, bring that story to you in a second. right after this quick break >> even know what junior guarantee you to divide. >> this is a debacle. >> a second term we can all agree on post comedy central's the daily show tonight and 11 phone companies in streaming next day on fair enough. >> i need a car. i really need it i'm going to check out dr. time, that drive time makes it super easy to get approved online. >> wait for it >> crystal his approve a group that's dr. time told me my down payment and my monthly payment before she stepped foot inside a dealership. no one tells you that on the way? >> they don't haggle with you, you know, this is really on your own term. >> that's pretty affordable, nice, and easy drives time >> off the hook is 100% while calls jonah physical compliment. and i'm taking the bait. all right, about podd down. personally finished get it, trucked subways, pasted tuna today >>

high stakes in the us — as the supreme court hears an unprecedented case — whether to kick donald trump the 2024 presidential ballot. polls close in pakistan, after millions vote in general and provincial elections. a new study suggests erectile dysfunction drugs could also reduce the risk of alzheimer's disease. the biggest mass migration in the world is under way in china as millions of people head home for new year with their families. sport and a full round—up from the bbc sport centre. first to the news that uefa president alexander ceferin has made the surprise decision to step down in three years�* time. at the annual congress on thursday, a motion was passed that allowed him to stand for a fourth term — the english fa voted against that, by the way, but he says he made the decision six months ago. i have decided, let's say around six months ago, that i am not planning to run in 2027 any more. the reason is that after some time, every organisation needs fresh, but mainly because i was away from my family for seven years now and i will be away from them for three more until 27. i

is really all we do. >> 80087 to 4901 happening right now, arguments are underway before the us supreme court as the nine justices tried to settle a >> question, did the government go too far on bump stocks for guns? you might recall that the 2017 las vegas shooter used a bump stock to basically turn a semiotic a medic weapon into a machine gun. he killed dozens of people from a 32nd floor snipers perch in the deadliest mass shooting in modern us history. now a gun rights group wants the justices decide if the trump administration went too far when it banned the device back in 2018 cnn, justice correspondent jessica schneider is when they hear we're watching all of this unfold, jessica, this is not a second amendment case. what's the argument from the plaintiffs? >> yeah, this is really a case wolf about statutory interpretation and that's what the justices have been trying to grapple with for just about the past 90 minutes plaintiffs here are arguing that bump stocks don't fall within the meaning of a statute first enacted in 1930. that was intended and did effectively banned machine guns. i

and the us supreme court hears arguments in two landmark cases about social media censure, that couldns. hello, i'm caitriona perry. france's president emmanual macron signaled he isn't ruling out sending western troops to ukraine, after meeting european leaders in paris. macron declined to provide details about which nations were considering sending troops, saying he prefers to maintain some strategic ambiguity. it's the first time there has been such an open discussion of western nations collectively looking at providing troops to support the ukrainian military — which has struggled on the battlefield in recent months. mr macron warned russia is looking to take more terrority and presents a danger beyond ukraine.

the us supreme court heard arguments in two lawsuits today which could shape the way america regulates social media. at issue are laws in texas and florida that put restrictions on how platforms like facebook, youtube and x police online material. our north america business correspondent michelle fleury filed this report. what can people say, hear or read online? for several hours, justices from america's highest court questioned aspects of legislation passed in florida and texas that limits what social media platforms can do to moderate content. now, these laws were introduced after the siege of the capitol onjanuary 6, which led to former president donald trump being removed from several social media networks. supporters of the law argued that it was necessary to prevent censorship of conservative users, a long—running concern among republicans. they argued that they were simply trying to regulate business behaviour, not the speech of these firms. but opponents, including netchoice, which is the industry group challenging both laws, said they infringed on the platform's own first ame

republicans, they fully support him, but washington doesn’t like all this, and the us supreme court even. in your opinion, how far can all this go, as they say? well, today the situation has worsened, since it turned out that the compromise that was reached in the senate does not receive approval in the house of representatives and may even face opposition. actually in the senate, and since there will be no agreement on changes in immigration legislation in the entire migration system, then naturally the border states, first of all... for the first time in history, more than 40% of voters say that immigration is the main problem facing the united states. biden has only 22% of voters approve of his performance on border security, which means that about half of democrats in his own party also disapprove of his performance in this area. and so we saw. frantic attempts by both the white house and democrats in the senate somehow push through some measures that would , well, at least stabilize the situation, although it did not solve the problem, but since a stalemate arises again, naturally,

the us supreme court has signor's project and attempt to remove donald trump from the trench 24 presidential invalid justices appeared skeptical. jordan, maturing over the colorado supreme court ruling that bought drums from the states primary off to finding the engage and insurrection on january 6th, 2021. if on k o, when the call to an issue of sorting. so a few 100 has been held for the middle, shall you do assassinated by the us and the is all kick opposite about that. washington has confirmed that it's killed. a senior romando of the type has voted a group. internet strikes, blaming the is on back from the la shuffle, attacking us troops in the region. that's cool. now to focus on web preliminary results from the election have now started coming in. the vote has been mowed by violence in allegations of corruption. several people were killed in wilson dis, access tens of millions cost. they're both on the heavy security. the government says mobile antoinette networks are gradually being restored off to being shut down on during the day. vote counting is underway across pakistan, followin

the us supreme court allowed the federal border service to demolish barriers along a forty-eight-kilometermexico and allow even more migrants into texas. texas authorities are ignoring the ruling. according to their calculations, after the local national guard almost forcefully drove out the feds from the border territory established its own control over it, the flow of illegal immigrants was reduced to zero. the democratic party , against the backdrop of falling biden's pre-election ratings , is trying to find a way out with the help of a tightening bill. in the house of representatives next week, when the senate starts talking about a joint deal, save yourself, it will never work. another scandal related to texas: a video of the supposedly full version of the interview that governor greg abate gave to fox news on january 4th appeared on social networks. differs significantly from the version posted on the website of the american tv channel. all of the four policies that donald trump put in place that led to the lowest illegal border crossings. in 40 years, if only the president had been

the us supreme court hears arguments in a case that could determine whether donald trump can be kickedff the 2024 presidential ballot. president putin has insisted that russia has no interest in invading poland, latvia or other nato countries — in an interview with the former fox news anchor, tucker carlson. in pakistan's elections, local media are reporting that independent candidates linked to jailed former prime minister, imran khan, were leading the early count. and millions on the move as locals head home to their families to celebrate lunar new year. live from our studio in singapore — this is bbc news. it's newsday. thank you for being with us. president biden�*s memory has been called into question after an investigation by a us prosecutor in to how he handled classified documents after serving as vice president in 2017. the report found that mr biden had willfully retained and disclosed material — but said he will not face criminial charges. the report says it would be difficult to convict him as he comes across as an "elderly man with a poor memory". our north america corresp

the supreme court is expected toissue the supreme court is expected to issue its ruling injune in the crucial months ahead of the upcoming ussidential election. in other news, microsoft has inked a new partnership with a french start—up, part of the tech giant�*s strategy to expand its footprint in the artificial intelligence issue. it will give microsoft access to a new customer base and allow for mistral�*s large language models to be available on microsoft�*s azure platform. we�*ve been hearing a lot about al recently and what it means for the job landscape. linkedin, the business networking site, says by 2030ai will disrupt half of alljobs and change 70% of the skills needed in an average job. i spoke to the chief economist at linkedin who explained how companies are beginning to retrain workers. we had a really interesting set of data at linkedin. we have over a billion members and 65 million companies. that�*s a lot of data to understand how people�*s jobs are changing over time and what are the skills employers are looking for. so we were able to dissect all of that and conclude that a lot of jobs are seeing skills t