president trump doubled down and tweeted, "bob corker gave us the iran deal. that's about it. we need health care, tax cuts and reform. we need people that can get the

he has placed actual sanctions, the us, on iran in the summer sanctions, the us, on iran in the summerand iran in the summer and that has had a huge impact on huge deals, us banks if they have interests in those deals, difficult for them to get involved, that's really damaged business deals between europe as well and iran? from iran's point of view, post the nuclear deal, the us financial sanctions were not lifted anyway so iran continues to experience huge difficulties access the dollar system and basically, if sanctions and this is a big if, if sanctions are reimposed on iran and latterly by the state, this will come at a delicate time for the iranian economy but the expected impact will be more moderate compared to last time partly because sanctions have entered what one might describe as a diminishing return phase and also because there isn't a widespread international consensus which the us had last time that will not support president trump in this line of activity towards iran. thank you very much for your time. let's take a look at some of the other stories making the news... shar

the us and israel and it. if that is nuclear power in the us and israeland iran it. ar power in the us and israel and iran should have it as well. since the 1970s, the united states has been struggling with a run and wants to strike revolution. but we support the revolution. but we support the revolution and stand by it to the end. and we are not afraid of anything, not of sanctions, not of war. and i think donald trump talks too much. esfandyar batmanghelidj, founder of europe—iran forum joins me now. thank you forjoining us in the studio. what do you expect president trump to say today? i think the business community should breathe this i believe that the trump administration spent yesterday briefing european diplomats and members of the press about the announcement they are set to make today and the early reporting makes it clear that the administration is not pulling out of the agreement. donald trump will be certified that the iran is in compliance with the deal on a national security basis but is basically sending this issue the congress and asking congress to m

the first place. it wasn't bilateral agreement between us and iran. it wasn't even the bilateral sanctions that we had on iran. it is the fact that we did lead, was able to get the other countries to work with us and for them to also apply the sanctions, multilaterally, that brought them to the table so we could discuss what issue, our focus was, to prevent them from having a nuclear weapon. as you have appropriately said. and that there is nothing to prevent this, because i think we're all united on the fact that we're not sitting back and trusting iran and saying we're not going to do anything other than nefarious activity. we got to stop them. and we've got to use other sanctions. we got to continue to try to unite and bring our allies together as we did on this agreement to prevent iran from having nuclear weapons. and i think that we all agree, too, i don't know any bill ever passed the united states congress or any place else that's perfect. there is no bill that's perfect. we always negotiate and no one gets their way 100%. that being said, i wo

. >> well, real quickly, the president tweeted, bob corker gave us the iran deal. that's about it. we feed health care, tax can you describe u cuts/reform. we need people that can get the job done. it was interesting to hear the president. i think it was just on friday when he gave this interview that the hill was reporting on saying that you know in theory, i want to focus on north korea, iran, other things. i don't want to focus on fixing somebody's back or their knee or something. let the states do that. anyway, now he is saying bob corker can't get that job done. really interesting. great to see you. kareen, great to see you. thanks, for your time as we have been talking about the tweet storm from the president the freshest went minutes ago the head-to-head matchup with bob corker, saying he gave us the iran deal, and that's about it. we need health care, we need tax cuts/reform, we need people getting things done. on the heels of learning cia chief mike pompeo for the job of secretary of state. but that job is already filled. rex tillerson has that job. is he considering leavin

basis decision based on the allegation that iran has not complied with the deal he used the idea that that will mention previously which is that sanctions relief is not proportionate to iran's actions under the deal in order to decertify he couldn't use noncompliance as justification so i think there is no doubt that the decision was taken based on other reasons based on the fact that the president does not like this deal he had put himself in a rhetorical corner by repeatedly calling it a bad deal and an embarrassment for the united states even before becoming president that he just simply couldn't live with this ninety day certification which was a real burden on his shoulders now the real question is does the certification actually improve iran's behavior across the board on some other issues that the president mentioned in his speech including iran's role in the region and i think if one has an understanding of the sources of iranian conduct in the region one would come to the conclusion that putting iran under more pressure and threatening iran across the board and arming its reg

news live from berlin donald trump reignites the us this feud with iran decertifying the landmark agreement to curb its nuclear program but the us president stopped short of outright torpedoing the deal instead leaving its fate in the hands of congress. also coming up austria is expected to take a sharp swing to the right in sunday's elections will take a look at how a hardline immigration stance has helped front runner sebastian kurtz snap up support. my ass waiter thank you for joining us u.s. president has said he will not recertify the twenty fifteen iran nuclear deal the multilateral agreement calls for iran to shelve its disputed nuclear program and in exchange the international community would ease sanctions trump has accused iran of violating the quote spirit of the agreement but stopped short of canceling the deal instead he's called on u.s. lawmakers and international partners to fix its flaws the agreements to pilates that the u.s. president must certify to congress that iran is complying with the agreement every ninety days trump has done this twice before but has now refused to

the inside story which starts now. donald trump's a nuclear reaction as he writes about iran the us president has a refusing to recertify the nuclear deal signed two years ago and accuses the iranians of breaking the agreement iran says allegations are delusional and world leaders are also critical this is inside story. hello again i'm james bose welcome to inside story after months of bold talk and threats against iran the u.s. president is laying out a new strategy to challenge the leadership in tehran donald trump's refusing to certify the major nuclear deal signed with iran two years ago the obama administration and six world powers agreed to lift a long running sanctions in return for a rainy and promises to limit nuclear weapons development trump says iran is not meeting the conditions of the agreement but stop short of completely withdrawing from it instead he's asking congress to consider new sanctions on iran by his own terms the iran deal was supposed to contribute to regional and international peace and security and yet while the united states said here is to our commitment under the deal the iranian regime c

the us creates more. . . deal. what happens if the us creates more... fresh sanctions against iran? how might iran react?st iran? how might iran react? i think it depends very much on what the nature of the sanctions are. the us, under the terms, is permitting sanctions to iran for issues outside of the nuclear file. sanctions to iran for issues outside of the nuclearfile. so on ballistic missiles, human rights, concerns about regional activities. all of those are areas where we have sanctions and if we find new reasons for sanctions that the cave. if we we re for sanctions that the cave. if we were to reimpose any sanctions that we re were to reimpose any sanctions that were lifted under the agreement iran would correctly say we are out of compliance and that would presumably call their compliance with their obligations it to that as well. the iran deal when it was first negotiated had a bumpy path, but looking at the other side of the coin could donald trump the right? iran is still testing the listed missiles, they are still involved in complex in the region, is it a bad deal? categorically not. first

good evening we begin with the latest on what is regarded as being a major shake. us policy towards iran the us president donald trump saying earlier on the scene. at he is not going to certify the deal struck two years ago. between six world powers and iran that deal. the goal of cutting the islamic republic's nuclear ambitions was speaking at the white house earlier on today president trump's said the deal is no longer the interests of us national security. although he did not pull you s. of the deal altogether. please give in the us congress sixty days to decide whether or not to re introduce sanctions against tehran is reset. states and i am announcing today that we cannot. and will no. make this certification. we will not continue down a path whose predictable conclusion is more violence. more tara. and the very real threat of iran's nuclear breakout. that is why i am directing. my administration to work closely with congress and our allies. to address the deals many serious flaws so that the iranian regime can never threaten the world with nuclear. weapons. us president donald trum

the leadership in iran. it is the same power that use money and pressure and agents to an elected legal government in iran. apparently, he has forgotten that the resistance of the iranian nation for democracy and theislamic republic, country that did throw most of it support to this dictatorship in iran was the united states. president trump has forgotten the fact that after the victory of the islamic revolution and at the end of the day the revolution the plot by the united states was another coup. of course, one more time, they they tried80-1981, to repeat it. apparently they have forgotten the fact since the 1980's and it was the united states that backed the invaders. they also forgot the fact that when iran was being bombarded by missiles and chemically attacked the statement that what the u.s. was supposed to make in order to condemn the invaders and support the oppressed being invaded, they did the opposite. we need to go through the history much more carefully. over the past six decades or so, what they have done to the iranian people. over the past 40 years after the victory of the islamic revoluti

iran, giving his thoughts on the iran nuclear deal signed two years ago under the 0bama administration saying it is one of the worst and most one sided transactions the us he talked about iran as the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism under the control of a fanatical regime. with me is our correspondent international correspondent. what did you make what of we heard? it is interesting how he decided to structure the speech in and what comes out of that, his main concern, the main concern of his, sunni arab allies in the gulf and also of israel, is iran's behaviour in the region. he set out first of all the new strategy to counter what he said we re strategy to counter what he said were iran's aggressive actions across the region. he dealt with that and then he went to the nuclear deal. underlining that it's, and that's the way they see it, the nuke clare deal is the secondary threat. it has to be redone. it is one of the worse deals he has seen. people around the world will be doing a fa ct around the world will be doing a fact check. it was a selective history. it is history. yes, after the iranian revolution of 1979 there was the seizing of th

iran's role regionally i just i see both i see parts of. certain more hard line elements within the united states talking and i also see. those regional players who were used to a smokescreen of iran or the nuclear the in order to justify their own bad behavior their own disruptive policies policies that included violations of the rights of the palestinian people. trampling upon their most elemental right for for the past seventy years which has resulted in terror mostly in our region. aggression against every country in the region by by israel a nuclear weapon policy that has continued to threaten not only the region but the global nonproliferation regime pursued again by israel and an unfortunate policy of supporting extremism and terrorism by saudi arabia that has. affected our region if you look at syria if you look at yemen if you look at elsewhere in the region the unfortunate saudi posture against qatar. these are all policies that are pursued by saudi arabia have been pursued by saudi arabia and they only use the smokescreen of iran's nuclear program as a way to hide behind it and to sort of justify their own iranians policies i guess the nuclear a

the policy of imposing sanctions on iran for the past forty years basically they have immunized us to u.s. sanctions but from a global perspective it seems that the united states is addicted to sanctions and they believe they have an obsession they believe that sanctions will work in fact i think they should have learned by now that sanctions don't work you cannot impose. pressure on countries to abandon their sovereignty to abandon their dignity for a few restrictions that the united states has imposed on them i think the sooner the united states realizes that this type of behavior this type of policy is bound . to backfire and it's bound to create resistance and strengthen the resolve of the people to move pursue their own policies and their own interests. the sooner the united states achieves this important recognition of reality the sooner it can adjust its policies in a way that would even serve the interests of the united states but when you hear these statements coming out of washington from donald trump and he's allies about the agreement not being a good one for the united st

the u.s. has shown no sign of supporting we hope for a unified iraq to annihilate isis and certainly a unified iraq to push back on iran so if the us has named ron as the second greatest threat after i saw so countering iran could very well be the driving force behind the us abandoning its support kurds i don't want to use the word betrayal but we definitely feel the united states has been negligent iraq's upcoming election set for april two thousand eight hundred may become a make or break moment for the us and could possibly affect its objectives in the region april's election is a choice between the vice president the leaking all to describe the suddenly into the us and iran and the current president a body is that odds with what you have here the moment you have a prime minister in iraq who is supported by the americans the previous prime minister who is waiting in the wings which is the extreme part which is very close to the iranians and the united states made it clear to the kurdish leadership before their friend last. september that they wished to delay the refer to the middle east after iraqi election in next spring so if

remain engaged quick reminder here of the deal signed two years ago by the us russia china france the u.k. and germany along with iran of calls it aim to stop iran from producing materials that could be used for nuclear weapons for which in turn economic penalties were lifted including american sanctions and a european or oil embargo on iran as well but for the u.s. is part the deal needs to be certified by the u.s. president every ninety days the next deadline october fifteenth and if president doesn't renew it then it goes to congress which has to decide if sanctions should be reinstated or not it's his time i came in in washington d.c. following this story it seems like another long taze from president trump has been talking about this for a long time and now all the talk becomes a little more call great is there any suggestion that the deal will survive or at least the u.s. is part of the deal will survive. well as you as you noted he talked about the deal or iran having violated the spirit of the deal twice already the united states under his administration has said that certifies that they that iran is complain

the man donald trump says he is prepared to cancel the iran nuclear deal at any time now that deal was negotiated back in two thousand and fifteen by the us britain france and germany along with russia and china it is crippling economic sanctions against iran and exchange for strict controls on its nuclear program now trump is threatening to make good on a long running promise to unravel the accord has a bit more of what he had to say. in just a few years as key restrictions disappear iran can sprint towards a rapid nuclear weapons breakout in other words we got we can spec sions in exchange for no more than a purely short term and temporary delay in iran's path to nuclear weapons what is the purpose of a deal that at best only delays a ran's nuclear capability for a short period of time this as president of the united states is unacceptable but based on the factual record i have put forward i am announcing today that we cannot and will not make this certification. well from all of this i'm joined now by dr henning from the german council on foreign relations after we give thanks for being with us today on the day this is a deal that germ

each other, but they are part of the same problem and i believe that for the longer-term, iran wants to dominate the region and throw usout of the middle east, whether hegemon and the larger goal of hegemon and the u.s. is the balance that is focusing to make iran a normal state and an abnormal state that is in part a state, the structures of this state, but the resolution that seeks to spread and be promoted and used to dominate the region by defeating iran's effort of hegemony i think we should succeed and not and it won't be easy and then we can make progress to make iran a state. .. the prime minister of iraq, don't coordinate with uranian forces, don't fight with them, how do you see the administration's actions? >> he doesn't listen to us when we asked him for a referendum and made an alternative offer but we think larger, more broadly than just being unhappy with this nonbinding referendum shouldn't be a surprise to anyone, more or less public opinion. >> what about the other 7%, what did they? >> because of that disappointment we have not been strong enough or engaged enough, we need to make it clear all use of

fired off a series of tweets attacking senator corker bob corker who helped president obama give us the bad iran deal and couldn't get elected dog catcher in tennessee is now fighting tax cuts that was the first tweet that he went on to tweet corker dropped out of the race in tennessee when i refused to endorse him and now he's only negative on anything tropp look at his record. trump added another tweet isn't it sad that white wait senator bob corker couldn't who couldn't get reelected in the great state of tennessee will now fight tax cuts plus. and he tweeted further senator corker is the incompetent head of the foreign relations committee and look how poorly the u.s. has done he doesn't have a clue as the entire world was laughing in taking advantage of us people like little bob corker have set the us way back now we move. our lives put in our washington correspondent carolina jim oid carolyn it's good to see you well the the feud between the senator and the u.s. president and certainly kept you busy today talk to me about the impact of corker's criticism today i mean will it make a differen

the brief part right hopefully. iran and terrorism are sort co-joined because terrorism is a sort of strategic doctrine of the iranian state. they use violence. and it's actually remarkably effective. through the militias and various terrorist organization that's iran has trained over the years that act as its proxy and progeny. and also there was a time when terrorism was considered a weapon of the weak. in the hands of the islamic republic it's a weapon of considerable strategic deterrence because right now the iranian case is that if the united states accuses us of terrorism we will respond with terrorism against american forces in iraq and elsewhere. that argument has been persuasive to a lot of people who essentially do not want to confront iran for fear of iranian terrorism. so as a doctrine of statecraft, more so as a gesture of political violence, terrorism has been a remarkably effective tool for the islamic republic. >> and you can say a little bit the iranians are backing the houthi, right? in yemen. >> well, they're involved in syria. they're involved in yemen. they're involved in iraq. certainly iraq. they're involved i

example, while the bill that passed over the summer specifically sanctions those who materially contribute to iran's ballistic missile program, the bill before us today goes a step further by sanctioning those that are in the business of financing iran's efforts. the conventional weapons prohibition in the bill before us are also stronger, and let me explain why. the august legislation referenced the united nations register of conventional arms, which excludes such items as russia's recent sale of the s-300 air defense system to iran. the bill before us ensures that there is no such carve out. so, mr. speaker, members have different views on how to handle iran's nuclear program, but when it comes to iran's ballistic missile and conventional weapons programs, all 323 co-sponsors of this bill agree, iran has no business developing or acquiring intercontinental ballistic missiles. and that's why it's so important that we pass this bill and give the administration the tools to respond and i'll reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves. for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. enge

secretary emily thornberry has said donald trump's threat to the iran nuclear deal was "reckless, mindless and downright dangerous". last week, the usccused iran of reneging on the agreement which was signed by president 0bama in 2015. the deal curbs iran's nuclear ambitions, and in return, some sanctions that stopped iran from trading on international markets and selling oil have been lifted. in the commons, labour used an urgent question to press ministers over their response to president trump. mr speaker, the nuclear deal with iraq stands out as one of the most successful diplomatic achievements in the last decade. and let us be clear, the deal is working. what could today have been another north korean crisis in the heart of the middle east has instead been one problem that that region doesn't have to worry about. so for donald trump to jeopardise that deal, for him to move the goalposts by linking it to important but utterly extraneous issues around iran's wider activities in the region, for him to play these games, is reckless, mindless and downright dangerous. it makes a reality of hillary clinton's prophecy that putting don

us. the german foreign minister said yesterday he believing desert if iing the deal puts us more on path toward war. how do you respond? >> iran is not saying death to germany. they're saying death to america. this is not talking about the deal. this is talking about u.s. law. and what u.s. law says is every 90 days, you have to re-evaluate and see if it's still doing and still proportionate from what it was supposed to do. you look their support of terrorism. the ballistic missile test. all they're doing with arms what the concessions that we gave them. it's something we can make better. >> you have had the president's military advisers saying iran has been come plying with the deal. let's take a look. >> i do believe it's in our national security interest at the time to remain in the jcpoa? that's a yes or no question. >> yes, senator. i do. >> iran is not in material breach of the agreement. i believe the agreement has delayed the development of a nuclear capability by iran. >> we're not saying they're in breach of the agreement. we're saying of the sites inspected, no, they're doing what they claim to do. but all sites hav

the iran deal. this is what the president tweeted this morning. corker helped president o. give us the bad iran deal. that's not the first time the president has made this claim. he said earlier corker was largely responded for the horrendous iran deal. the fact of the matter is that is simply not true. corker was one of the most vocal critics of this deal as chairman of the senate foreign relations committee. he said ", the deal leaves the united states vulnerable and more able to work its will in the middle east." that is exactly what senator corker as chairman of the foreign relations committee worked to do once that deal was sent to congress, senator corker joined with 50 -- was one of 54 republicans, four democrats joining with them to try and push a resolution forward that would have rejected the iran deal outright. that was senator corker's bill but it fell two votes shy of the filibuster. that was not the beginning of corker's opposition to the iran deal and worked before that to actually strengthen crossing' oversight over this deal. this was the iran nuclear review act wh

the agreement. he wants them to include triggers that could see sanctions imposed if iran violates the deal. and if iran is still not in compliance, the usthout congressional action or debate. in his previous life, donald trump was a builder. now it seems he prefers the wrecking ball, particularly on anything that is a legacy from the obama era — whether it is immigration, climate change, and now iran. he seems to want to break it up and is saying to congress "it's for you to fix it." but the original deal with iran was negotiated with a number of countries, including britain — notjust the us. and this evening, the other partners to it have reacted with dismay and anger to the president's statement. it is not a bilateral agreement. it does not belong to any single country and it is not up to any single country to terminate it. so the president of the united states has many powers, but not this one. there's been condemnation, too, from iran's president rouhani, and a strikingly similar point. translation: trump did not correctly study international law. how is it that a multilateral treaty adopted by the united nations, originally a unite

one of the most hardline newspapers in iran said y esterday that trump gave us a gift -- this hardline approach is undercutting the moderates and embarrassing them because their gamble did not work out, while causing the rally around the flag phenomena john mentioned. xperience --me experience promoting hardliner leaders in iran. it didn't work out. that is the regime we're dealing with, the reaction to our excessive meddling in this country. it is hard to tell innocence in iran -- innocents in iran, why don't you suffer under a worse ,ictatorship than you are now even though we are really looking out for your interests? we talked about the united states will do. of, whathe question would you recommend to conservatives, what would you recommend to the leadership of iran? deal and stick to the say you would remain with your european partners? do, if you were advising iran? >> one of you go ahead. >> it would be a wise course to stick to the deal and put the and on the united states say, we are the good guys here. and living by the deal. the united states is not. i think they will do tha

the entire time. that is iran. we welcome president strategy to address the full range of i ran interference in the use. this includes growing ballistic missile programs, support for terrorist organizations, never attacked her parents in each other's affairs, and threats to freedom of navigation the nuclear deal offered iran an opportunity to engage responsibly. instead it emboldened iran to intensify the stabilizing action. the u.s. can count on the uae along with others threat and as we engage in these critical efforts, sleep more comfortably knowing that u.s. horses under general commands are helping to keep the region morsi. -- more secure. knowing john has the full commitment from the uae like helping to keep america safe. leighton doman, please join me in welcoming our keynote speaker and friend general joe hotel -- joe. [applause] great to be here. your excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for the opportunity, and speak with you this afternoon. when you get selected to come and speak after a very heavy lunch. that included a large seller, bread with her, warm big chicken on a bed covered

committee, including this tweet, quote, bob corker, who helped president o, president obama, give us the bad iran deal and couldn't get elected dog catcher in tennessee is now fighting tax cuts. corker dropped out of the race in tennessee when i refused to endorse him and now is only negative on anything trump. look at his record, closed quote. the senator fired right back against trump on twitter saying, quote, same untruths from an utterly untruthful president #alertthedaycarecenter. he then elaborated in an extensive interview with cnn's manu raju. >> you didn't run for re-election because you couldn't get his endorsement. is that accurate? >> no, it's into the accurate. you know, nothing that he said in his tweets today were true or accurate. he knows it. people around him know it. i would hope the staff over there would figure out ways of controlling him when they know that everything he said today was absolutely untrue. >> do you regret supporting him in the election? >> let's just put it this way, i would not do that again. >> you wouldn't support him? >> no. no. i think that he's proven h

the president responded by writing bob corker who helped president o give us the iran deal and couldn't get elected dogcatcher in tennessee is now fighting tax cuts. we digress. the point is this is shaping up to be a super fun lunch. suzanne malveaux on capitol hill. this just gets weirder and weirder. >> people are wondering if what will be on the menu is crow, that people will end up eating crow, you have corker facing off with the president and a lot of republicans offering their opinion, and senator thune saying this should be a sit down to let the president show he can work with the republicans. there's a win for both sides. they want a legislative victory, and it does seem senate republicans are willing to give up some things including looking at a budget here that looks like it will add to the federal deficit, and the tax plan is on the table and that's what senate republicans are also hoping to push forward as well, and already president trump slapping down and taking off the table the notion of a cap on the tax-free income that you can put in your 401(k), for example, and so t

iran like boeing for example. well of companies to make investment decisions what they do not want is uncertainty but that's exactly what those remarks from the us president bringing and if you talk about boeing in general after the sanctions against iran got lifted it was mostly european companies like french carmaker renault for example who were looking to increase business there with the country it's not that many big u.s. firms going after iran and one big exception is a boeing as you mentioned they actually have a deal going with iran to deliver eighty quid mercial jets for a list price of about seventeen billion dollars u.s. secretary of state rex tillerson was out saying that if you got special licenses and boeing did so then those still should be in place as far as we know now but still there was a little bit of pressure building up on the stock price of boiling and at the end we really have to wait and see how this all all plays out still a lot of reports coming in next week we'll be covering them with you thank you very much james carter in new york. he's saying the u.s. washington is hosting be a leader of global finance this weekend

and international partners to fix its flaws in the agreement stipulates that the us president must certify to congress that iran is complying with the agreement every ninety days iran has trumped excuse me had done this twice before but has now refused to sign ahead of sunday's deadline now congress must decide whether to reimpose sanctions and scrap the deal here is more of what trump had to say importantly iran is not living up to the spirit of the deal so today in recognition of the increasing menace posed by iran and after extensive consultations with our allies i am announcing a new strategy to address the full range of iran's destructive actions i am announcing today that we cannot and will not make this certification we will not continue down a path whose predictable conclusion is more violence more terror and the very real threat of iran's nuclear breakout well israel for one has welcomed to trump's announcement prime minister binyamin that's why now congratulated the u.s. president for what he called a quote courageous step the response from other world leaders has been less than enthusiastic the iran

the president summed up the situation this way tweeting bob corker gave us the iran deal and that's aboute, we need tax cuts and reform. we need people who can get the job done. joining us now ed rollins chairman of the great america pack who served at the top level of two white house administrations as the assistant to the president. great to have you here. >> ed: thank you very much. >> lou: bob corker what in the world is he doing? >> the unfortunate thing is bob corker is there for two more years determined not to run for re-election, certainly his perogative but if he becomes the in-house critic at chairman of foreign relations committee it's a big platform for him to basically dump on the president. >> lou: you got to be clear the ron he's there is because of mitch mcconnell. >> absolutely. >> lou: mcconnell could end this nonsense. >> the conference needs to basically bring him in. you know you can argue, you can disagree on votes but you can't have a major chairman of your own party criticizing the president on his foreign policy and anything else. >> lou: he looks so small, so in

the "washington post." congress should reject this iran deal and send it back to the president. >> corker, who helped president obama give ussuch a rapid clip. the president objectively lies so much. you can prove it. like we could spend three hours a day just on his lies, but mike barnicle. here he says -- and he keeps saying it over and over again. it's the big lie theory. if you keep lying over and over again about something, one day people will believe it. donald trump repeatedly says bob corker, bob corker who gave us the iran deal. and as i said, bob corker actually what does he do, he actually wrote an opinion piece in the "washington post" in august of 2015 saying the iran deal is a bad deal. it will make iran resur jant in the middle east and it will be a serious problem and since congress must reject the iran deal and send it back to obama. >> joe, from this tweets that you're just reading from the tweets of the past week taking on a war widow is further evidence of the sad, sad fact that the president of the united states is not a complete man. he is not a whole individual. whole individual. he has a gam gap p in

commander in chief responding, bob corker gave us the iran deal and that's about it. e need health care, we need tax cuts, reform, we need people that can get the job done. harvey weinstien fired from his own company. the the weinstein brothers, name is too tainted at this time. the head of the rifle association will not commit to banning bump stocks. we talked in the wake of las vegas massacre. he would rather the president regulate them instead saying that any action congress takes could be a slippery slope. >> there are monsters like this monster out there every day. the number one person teaching irresponsible use of firearms is also the elites employer, the hollywood, television gaming industry. we spend millions teachingry teaching responsibilities. >> ball game over. yankees win. heather: yankees win. the yankees beating the indians 1-0. game 4 is tonight in new york and the red sox, by the way, avoiding an alds sweep by the astros winning 10-3 in game 3. >> two pitch. high fly ball, right field life, towards the corner. it's good. heather: love it. they face ag

iaea demands access and iran says no, no, no, we face a problem if not resolved through the conflict resolution, we have right to say iran is -- by the way, we have allies with us, let's listen to them. if they agree, which they would if iran were to bar access in illegitimate way to military sites. that is not what we have today, there is no evidence. there are echos of iraq, we have to be careful of an administration manipulating and leading us down a path we have seen before. want to seeon't happen to israel either. when netanyahu's comments get more attention than the expert community and military establishment in israel. the vast majority of whom have said this is a good deal, it staves off iranian nuclear weapon. it is better to have iran, that doesn't have nuclear weapons than a break-out time of a few months. holly: question from this side. lady right there. question: hi. my name is debra shoeshon, director of policy and government relations at americans for peace now. pro-peace, pro-iranian deal organization, if any of you are interested in talking about israeli organization, they organization is pro-iran deal, we are working to preserve it. my questio

unilaterally decide to fight this important international deal apparently he's not in the know it is not a document between iran and the us so he can't treat it the way he likes. it took nine years of tough negotiations before the deal was finally reached in twenty fifteen although the standoff over iran's nuclear activities stretches back more than a decade and was widely regarded as one of the world's most urgent crises and it wasn't only the us that painstakingly negotiated the terms it was the combined efforts of russia china britain france and germany to the us actually a state has been trying to rally european allies over trans decision but so far they've mostly reacted angrily. i fully expected our allies and friends in europe maybe in the region are going to be very supportive president of united states us many posts not this one it is not a bilateral agreement it does not belong to any single country and it is not up to any single country to terminate it we cannot afford as international community as europe for sure to dismantle and nuclear agreement that is working and delivering especially now this is a difficu

iran out of the equation who can take on dodgy heidi for us because i don't think it would be a fully fair to refer to iran the state of iran as a terrorist organization that's a political interpretation of israel but if you take the iranian israel out of the equation altogether who will be there to confront the jihadi force all of us need to confront the all digital going to search on the before for me whether it comes home. less important. though for all of us the international community should conform those and we have states the poor to always still go on these asian like iran and. toes solving social issues themselves and we need to act against them and they believe that we need to act against them forcefully and this is something that the international community should do and those will do you would not find me supporting the. you know living with the situation. she's doing against against all of us because they would not a compromise on the system but how then would you explain explain the ease rail's position of neutrality in the syrian conflict if you're so willing to confron

moment for the us and could possibly affect its objectives in the region april's election is a choice between the vice president and the leaking all to describe the suddenly into the us and iran and the current president a body is that all it's with what you have here at the moment you have a prime minister in iraq who is supported by the americans the previous prime minister who is waiting in the wings which is the extreme part which is very close to radians and the united states made it clear to the kurdish leadership before they're a friend there's a last. september that they wished to delay the refer them and leave off the iraqi election the next spring so if the us seeks to resolve this problem of kurdish resistance washington will be forced to choose between two allies it's apparently not the kurds samir khan washington d.c. . cambridge university are being warned over the plays of shakespeare in case of potential distress some of the works contain scenes of sexual assault and violence on t.v. now takes a closer look at why the bard is now suddenly causing concern. ok to me from their worse than killing last and tumble me into some loathsome pit whenever my hands i may