is not yet in a position to offer an opinion on the merits of usac's review. and you have noted that in your response to us. however, i'm concerned about the amount of time that the process has taken. and i know chairman wheeler, you also expressed that concern in our reply. and i will just say that we look forward to working with you to find a resolution to this. commissioner o'reilly, i want to thank you for your letter. and it was your statement of dissent on the choices in the all individual issue. and i agree that it is that it is regulation by speculation. and mr. chairman, you just said, you know, that hundreds are seeking a way to get on. talking about some of the independent producers and the content producers that are seeking an avenue for the content they produce. and i have to tell you, you don't create equal opportunity by not paying people for what they have created. and, chairman pie, coming to you, i will have to tell you, a lot of my content producers that are there in tennessee, they are very concerned about the set-top box proposal and about

is not yet in a position to offer an opinion on the merits of usac's review.nd you have noted that in your response to us. however, i'm concerned about the amount of time that the process has taken. and i know chairman wheeler, you also expressed that concern in our reply. and i will just say that we look forward to working with you to fine a resolution to this. commissioner o'reilly, i want to thank you for your letter. and it was your statement of dissent on the choices in the all individual issue. and i agree that it is that it is regulation by speculation. and mr. chairman, you just said, you know, that hundreds are seeking a way to get on. talking about some of the independent producers and the content producers that are seeking an avenue for the contenant they produce. and i have to tell you, you don't create equal opportunity by not paying people for what they have created. and chairman pie, coming to you, i will have to tell you, a lot of my content producers that are there in tennessee, they are very concerned about the set top box proposal and about

the sweetwater consortium received a final decision from usac on friday, denying their appeal, and my office is continue with other offices to gather information from the interested parties and we expect that it will end up with you all, before very long. and the tennessee delegation wrote the fcc last year and received a response on july 20 1, 2015, we appreciate that. i understand that you sack -- usac needs to be a watchdog of dollars and they are not in a position yet to give merits on the review. however, i am concerned about the amount of time that the process has taken, and i know that this chairman also expressed concern in our reply. i will say that we look forward to working with you. to find a resolution to this. commissioner o'reilly, i want to thank you for your letter, or -- it was your statement of dissent on the choices in the op-ed issue. i agree with you that it is regulation, not speculation. said,. chairman, you just 100 -- hundreds are seeking a way to get on. talking about independent reducers and content producers, that are seeking an avenue for the content they

iths nor the lm'scameer niard la tind cie b4 s.wee j saying, ieems we j athens ymcsle rh usac eieas j >>>>hat's i ke,acs ? >>eac ot >>e s eotalth >> y ? >> as joy for theor is iset. >> hre ts hey. ireek va wkn w t ars? d it s lor sid ln >> c >> er. t waien myul all my fault. th y, ime ther, atart wti omy first df kier. re s's now 11ead, rit?ha right. take a whil>> s p it fr lpece. g mrownowi whnd ulat a b t'she eroealiwhgrea jyne it's l winso mhed oirdam parennow.jo i pt. th hedur li itaslike ctuput wt l we enhees ,heto suound chara a a ddin thateeo t npod t ab se >>hink first s ihinkryedent t chten'tte tionalityo. core ch enyes nerso n ease peope.drn a s peon. ytou hexperi >>rying to ainst typ da oumbdue wikeng ensemble lthis? whe iusn-stopch anvery h yes,t'icffcara, hi esust that they pl hink wwa4 yeats orc t ti. to sdue whate we >>re a kn, i t what's ecl,hatethi lm - i don't kno poay -t'aythme oc on woueotth, is t g tbeit reall a and hing b nefit,hoin i ee w4 ye ago. >>umr wding >> i it,iv you edit >>t' righ ourast ig aroun seight aerease spell t(overe u co i .uydoing? ar! ey closi