the way itsuallywos is you ve aredill t usatstry, d 'sllfts t ne d itsaitth a tel. atit a senate bill. so i'm afraid that would not be -- that's not what the framers intended, but i'm afrai that that pactice has been going on for a long, lngim itlddiul t leitth b isi t d isi i t dere atidaid. there is the origination in the constitution that says revenue bills must originate in the house. that's what you've read in your cotu. biha onainus t oevl, amend it with a bill that -- >> [inaudible] abit wdothg theyt. ifou wene r iheonutat gwa that's the problem. that's why you need courts who will enforce the constitution. all the constitution, including the parts that, you kn, they ma not like. thas hele t we he o mof t tioneaen stclghipa o themarir here. >> jim duhal,no affiliation. this is sort of a question about mrvkinio asso res wndhar rt iaxdeon said that it could be upheld as a tax only if there was a realistic choi between either paying or quons, is in fact that provision, language to that effect in thopinion and, second, wouldn't that suggest that ifhex eedor eqng