interpreter. one would be called. the service would just be used in the inter rum until the on site interpreters can arrive. >> and people that request the service. they would pay for it. right? >> no. actually another great question. the city and county of san francisco pays for this service. >> also. is there any way they can actually teach as l.? >> that's a good question. not at this time. we don't do any teaching of asl. >> okay. hopefully. they can consider that. i would like to learn. to use within my family. >> sure. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> any other questions from council members? anybody from staff? >> yes, sir?. the chair. council woman. i appreciate your question. to susan about this service. we agree and concur there will always be a need for on site. interpreters. a good example of that. when you have these longer conversations. it's really very useful to have somebody there in the room. but we see so much potential and value. especially in the city. the direct service providing. public interface points. if somebody comes and t

interpreters. using an internet connection which allows for customers to connect to an asl interpreters. presentation by susan morgan, strategic account executive, languageline solutions.. public comment is welcome. agenda item number eight information item. supporting the chemoing us connects campaign. community living campaign is working with other senior. and disability organizationses to help expand opportunities for computer access and learning. high on the list is to hire more seniors. and adults with disabilities to be trainers. tutors. and volunteer coordinators, learn what you can do director, community living compaign and jennifer walsh, community connector, community living campaign. agenda item number nine. information item. report from the director of the mayor's office on disability. agenda item number ten. public comment. items not on today's agenda. but within the jurisdiction of the m d.c. each speaker is limited to three minutes. agenda item number 11. correspondence. number 12. discuss

[inaudible] use interpreters, a poor substitute for spanish speaking providers. physicians involved with the center were out raged as well at patient. cpmc's reply, we'll study the condition and report back which they have not done. people have to call a third party to get an appointment rather than having something directly add the center. the second issue i wish to address is the lack of accountability and transparency for cpmc. for over 2 years sf [inaudible] tried to establish a relationship with cpmc that allows the community to participate in the planning of services but was met with a stone wall. cpmc did convee a group of providers and citizens, but it was a update not a discussion. cpmc is blowing the opportunity of developing a relationship with community after years of mistrust and battle. to restore credibility cpmc needs to consult with the broad representation of the community [inaudible] holding a series of meetings [inaudible] >> next speaker. >> good afternoon. gordon mars with jobs of justice. access to jobs at cpmc especially the non constructi

[inaudible] use interpreters, a poor substitute for spanish speaking providers. physicians involved with the center were out raged as well at patient. cpmc's reply, we'll study the condition and report back which they have not done. people have to call a third party to get an appointment rather than having something directly add the center. the second issue i wish to address is the lack of accountability and transparency for cpmc. for over 2 years sf [inaudible] tried to establish a relationship with cpmc that allows the community to participate in the planning of services but was met with a stone wall. cpmc did convee a

this bilgding is we also have video remote interpretings here at southern police station as we celebrate the american with disabilities these [inaudible] through use for interpreter for those limited english speaking or hearing impaired. people come to nob flaub request information are better served through the use of the vri software program and a application like skype or face time where you can come in and talk to someone nase to face. this eliminates the needs and [inaudible] that needed to speak your language, but woo have those spokes too and [inaudible] spectacular in making sure we are communicate the way they are most comfortable. lou gairing said he was the luckiest guy in the world. i think i am. he made me chief which, thank you. because he decided to leave, thank you. and so it all worked out so that i get to be the first chief in this-i know the mayor speaks at city hall as the peoples palace, but this is the palace too so we'll call it peoples palace south. when the hall of justice was on kerny street was rebuilt in 1912. when the t moved to bryant street in 71 mayor jordan was there, which is wow! i was 2. that isn't a shock mr. ma

so it is a memberorial trying to get us to interpret history and look to the past. they have always been about lacking at the past so we proceed forward and maybe don't commit the same mistakes. . >> good afternoon, everyone. ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon we are going to begin thank you for your patience this good afternoon the the meeting will come to order that is the regular meeting of land use commission i am supervisor cohen i'm the chair to the right is supervisor wiener vice chair and ttd is supervisor campos who will be sitting in for supervisor kim so for today is meeting our clerk andrea ashbury also want to recognize john did i live iron and jennifer lowe as

greg suhr what is able to announce that they will be able to provide sign language interpretation to the public using our real remote interpreting, they are rolling out this service and the other office is of course the mayor's office on disability and also the county clerk, department of elections, recreation and parks, mayor's office on housing and community development t human services agency, office of citizens complaints and department of emergency management. in fact the department of emergency management is actually talking with the media and television stations to see if we can patch asl interpretation into their television feeds as a tool during emergencies to be effective in our communications. there is a lot of really exciting things happening with video remote interpreting. speaking of emergency management team. tomorrow is the 109th anniversary of the san francisco earthquake. i'm going to be at the fountain at 5:00 a.m.. if anyone would like to join me. i want to acknowledge that the city has been doing so much to try and build an earthquake resistance environment here in our infrastruc

section 924-c, this court had three different cases interpreting the meaning of the word use and one interpreting the word carry. that's a higher ratio of cases to words than this statute. i think what it says is that when there is a lot at stake, when many years of prison time are at stake, people litigate hard. >> is the test the same here for vagueness as when we determine the validity of a statute that specifies a crime? >> so i don't think that's so clear, justice kennedy. this court in chapman indicated there is a lesser degree of clarity required for vagueness doctrine in the sentencing context. >> why should that be when it is a mandatory -- this is mandatory as five years, no possibility, in this case is such a good illustration because the judge said if it were up to me, this person should get half or most what did he say, two-thirds? that would more than suffice. i'm locked into this by acca, shouldn't we demand from congress, if it wants to have that kind of enhancement, really clear statement? >> let me say two things about that, justice ginsburg. this statute involves re

least the it wider society starting with the discrediting and dismantling of an old language used to interpret power. you write the keystone pipeline is part of the final phase of extreme exploitation. >> i think carl marx's analysts of the inner working of capitalism and where it is going is correct. and he argued unfettered or unregulated capitalism was a revolutionary force. there is no internal force of gathering profits and once the external elements are removed that is free to exploit everything. human labor and the eco system until a collapse. and that is why the environmental crisis is a twin with the economic crisis. 40 percent of the ice is melted shell oil is up and they want to profit off the planet. the tar sands is a dirtier form of energy and there is no rational discourse about helping our children or exceeding generations. it is all about profiting in the most destructive way in the fastest way we can. it is probably very good it is very good for you know the bottom line, for large fossil fuel but bad for the human race. when civil society declined the common good is not part

use that right. that's a departure from the way in the past he has interpreted the constitution. the abe administration has determined that there are three conditions under which japan could use the right. they include an attack on a closely related country that threatens japan's survival, but only if other appropriate means are not available. in addition, only the minimum amount of force could be applied. government officials earlier this month submitted a set of security bills to the diet. if passed, it will give the government a legal basis for using the right. >> what are the members of the opposition saying? >> well, they've been highly critical. they say the government could apply the criteria arbitrarily to many situations. abe said he would be extremely careful to make sure that the situation meets all three criteria before mobilizing the sdf. he said he would in principle not deploy sdf units overseas to use force. he says that would go against the rule of necessary minimum extent and violate the constitution, but abe says the government could dispatch mine sweepers to th

he testified using an interpreter and letter board to spell out his answers.mes holmes appeared to be watching and listening but showed no emotion. does he look different? >> yes, he had unkempt, orange hair. he's grown a beard and put on some weight. >> reporter: he helped take holmes into custody after the shooting. >> did he cooperate with you? >> yes. >> did he seem confuse zed about anything? >> not at all. >> holmes admitted he is is shooter, but claimed insanity. cnn, centennial, colorado. >>> we are just days away from the highly anticipated uk elections. it could be the closest vote in decades. they put the labor and conservative party neck in neck. as we get closer, we hear from british voters as they appear to cast their ballots on thursday. ♪ >> hello from london. >> hello from london. >> hi, london. >> i will be voting. >> last time, i think i made a mistake. this time, i intend to put it right. >> every vote helps. i'm going to vote. >> policies, especially on immigration. i'm an immigrant. >> constituency the whole time i have lived there. it do

he testified using an interpreter and letter board to spell out his answers.ared to be watching and listening during all the testimony but showed no emotion. >> does he look different? >> yes. he had really unkept orange hair. since then he's grown a little bit of a beard and he's put on some weight. >> officer jason helped take holmes into custody after the shooting. >> he was very calm and sort of disconnected. >> did he cooperate with you? >> yes. >> did he seem confused about anything? >> not at all. >> holmes admits he was the shooter but pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity and could face the death penalty if convicted. ana cabrera, cnn, centennial, colorado. >> we have this breaking news out of new york. an nypd officer has just died. that coming from law enforcement officials. he was shot this weekend allegedly by a man named demetrius blackwell, age 35, and taken into custody. family is now with the new york city police commissioner bill bratton and they will have a press conference later this afternoon but imagine that is going to be another big

how does the use interpreted but how do these advisors, what would you advise to know what is left and how to go forward with it. the final turn getting the on crisis is much what does each side, what do they want to see from the other? both from the russian side and then from the u.s. side? in the end these were the considerations after distilling the data we got from both sides. these were before key considerations that we saw. the first one compete with russia to maintain international order. it sounds counterintuitive talk a lot about cooperate weekend weekend but will the delegates in each turn as of the uscybercom and look for areas of cooperation the russian cybercom and competitively. at one point we had one participant said we're in an environment where we are competitive, we should compete to compete when you must compete and cooperate when you can cooperate. so while you would think order would come through cooperation in this case the competition has got to be resolved first. the second one was just clued articulated the position toward russia, eastern europe and the ukrain

inspect the section is a public law, but the justice department and the nsa have been using a secret twisted interpretation of that law to go far beyond the scope of it. >> how significant really is this at the end of the day? >> this is incredibly significant. congress right now is considering reauthorize -- passing the freedom act which would adjust and limit the bulk collection and that's really a c-plus effort, the freedom act, which is really kind of pathetic given that it's been almost two years since edward snowden's disclosures, and all we've seen is more and more confirmation that the nsa spying is out of control. so this ruling is incredibly significant, because it confirms what edward snowden and the whistleblowers have been saying and revealed that that twisted secret interpretation is not legal -- >> but it does not rule on constitutionality, which is what the aclu suit was saying. so couldn't congress in their process of reauthorizing the patriot act simply make it more explicit that that is legal? because the court did not say that it is unconstitutional to do so. >> i haven't been through t

was interesting to talk to them in their native tongue and really bond with them without the use of interpreters, and see who they really were. >> yeah, and well, that is the best person for the job is the theme that comes up over and over again. there were a lot of people i met who were in the story who were in jobs at one point or another coded for men because their commanders said you're the best person for the job, and so you're in it. you know there were people who served as people in roles really from an hr standpoint reserved for men only, but commanders said it does not make sense. you're the best for it. we'll leave the paperwork. one gal said yeah, i -- i have such bad language on c-span. she said yeah, i looked like a bag for two years because it looked like i had done nothing when this truth she was doing a job that was only supposed to be filled by men, and i think it's a story, look, i mean, obviously, you can think of it what you will, but there's so much leadership in terms of i know what regulations are but this is a war that we're fighting, and you have to be innovative, and yo

. >> the daughter melody is deaf and she spoke to us through an interpreter. >> she said i love you andive you. >> she says the staff at homer g. phillips hospital in st. louis told her the premature baby had died hours after birth in november of 1965. the hospital closed 36 years ago, and no documents have been found directly supporting that story. and freshly unseemed documents from st. louis family -- unsealed documents from st. louis family court have baby diane being born at a different hospital. city records say the mother abandoned the baby. >> no no no. i have five other children that are spoiled. and i would have never given up a baby, never never. >> zella price stands by her story. >> that's what hurt me so bad when i saw her baby pictures that she didn't get the chance to be nourished and spoiled and treated like the other children because, like i said, when i left the hospital, and they told me that she had passed, i heard that before. so it was not only believable, it was acceptable. >> the newly released documents raised more questions. zella price's lawyer claims the sig

sean dermond is a living history interpreter. he shows us how a colonial soldier would dress for battle. >> we have with us here a typical continental soldier, an enlisted man. we start at the bottom. he has the buckled shoes. this was before laces become very common. we have then the stockings and the knee breeches. they go right to the knee. he has summer wear here. this is linen. this is very lightweight. the coat is all wool. over the breeches, we have the vest or the weskit as it's known. over here, we have the bayonet. this goes on the end of the gun. it makes the gun then basically a 6-foot spear. it's named after bayonne france. a lot of the military names are french derivatives, and that goes on the end of the gun. on his shoulder carriage, he's got his canteen for his water. he's got his haversack right here, which is provisions -- would be his food -- the meat, the cheese, the bread when they were lucky enough to get that. on the other side, he's got his cartridge box. this is where all his ammunition would be stored. he's got a r

interpreters. we thank you for joining us. thank you, council member wong. we will now proceed with the roll call. through the chair i would like to ask the control room to please remove the video display over the sign language interpreters, please. cochair supanich? >> present cochair senhaux, >> pre. kostanian? >> present. harriet wong? >> present. roland wong? >> yes. >> thank you, we'll now proceed with the agenda items. >> agenda item no. 1. roll call. agenda item 2. reading and approval of the agenda. item no. 3. public comment. items not on the agenda for today, but within the jurisdiction of the mdc. each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. agenda item no. 4. information item. report from cochair supanich. agenda item no. 5. overview of the mayor's office on housing opportunity, partnerships and engagement, hope, presentation on the role of hope, it's services, programs, projects and including the new navigation center. presentation by bev an duftey. director. public comment is welcome. agenda item no. 6. ceremonial item. kathy zarda, in honor of former

us. how should investors interpret the move? apple surged nearly 50% in the past 12 months. with krealtive strategies, they don't think so. the title is actually good news and they can concentrate on products they are more important than ever at apple and he possesses many of the same qualities he becomes cleave design officer on july 1st. they are moving lower and sitting at 1187, down by $16. silver also hitting a two-week low and if we clip over the board, copper, and flat numb. not being good or kind to materials today. over to you. >> hi, tyler. it's the one thing to clean from the note we had. i give it a c plus. we made our low yield after auction time. we are only about four basis points. much different from the long end. that shows you the curve movement. we are much loftier and flirting within one or two basis points. if you want to look at what's going on, we can talk about the euro breaking the 110 range to the downside. i think a month today chart with the dollar index is important. whether it was oil or multinationals, everybody was really nervous that the weak

i want to show you a very cool video, american sign language interpreter helping us experience musicerent new way. >> so you will recognize this song. >> ♪ ♪ >> i think she is so cool, shellbe, man i like the idea. >> yes, pretty cool. >> i thought she was just dancing! >> she is mimeing those words. >> your ma'am's spaghetti. >> so cool. >> love her. okay the choir won four straight years. they're from the philadelphia area. and they got brand new gowns they said, for the show today. >> oh, we love it. let's go outside and join them. >> let's talk to them. >> ♪ ♪ i'm whoopi goldberg and new york is my home. there's no place like it in the world and no better place to lean about the people who shaped who we are today. hear about the lives of slaves in colonial new york and about the fight to abolish slavery. pick a stop on the underground railroad and visit the home and grave of one of new york's most controversial citizens. a journey in new york is a journey through history. plan you next trip at iloveny.com/summer. there's something for everyone. the answer to treating your dog's f

to what it's like to have a company that big, in a volatile industry, communicating to us. >> how do we interpret should we expect a new ceo every couple of years? as soon as he hits 40, he's out? get a 25-year-old kid? it was kind of a weird announcement. not sure whether this was cover for something that they were unhappy with with the previous ceo or if they're genuinely excited about having somebody under 40. >> under 45. >> that's what i mean about culturally. you could never make that announcement, that you're not hiring somebody born before 1970. so let's put that aside for a minute. look, it's a rare when a company goes public and then the ceo is gone in less than a year. so there must have been some determination made that where they wanted the company to go in the future, they thought daniel was better prepared to do it. i don't think it has anything to do with age. >> for chinese companies, the most powerful position is that the of executive and executive vice chairman. which jack ma still occupies. even though the ceo is an important role, that's a distinction that u.s. executivings d

for us, the question is how do we improve the odds that they interpret their interests as consistenting a stabilizing force in the world. charlie: what is it about them that we don't understand? tim: part of it is they are a very different system from ours a less accessible system for us to understand. they are not a democracy. part of it is because they are having such a rapid change increase in their relative power, such a dramatic change, that they don't even know what they want yet and that makes it harder for them. charlie: my impression is that they are beginning to be more comfortable with it. tim: you see them acting on a basic premise. you would not want to extrapolate from that to suggest that that suggests underlying these actions, some strategy of aggression destabilizing expansion that would be fundamentally in conflict with our interests. it is possible, but i do not think you can interpret that from the things you are seeing them do today. charlie: when you look around the world, what worries you the most? tim: it's a messy, dark, sad world we live in. there's a lot ou

used creative interpretations to increase their jurisdiction beyond what congress has intended. . in fact the corps states on their website future would not apply. operation is no longerest tablied when the area on which it's conducted has rain idle. under this and normal activity and could be subject to regulation. as i mentioned earlier. in this time of record drought. leaving the field fallow, amongst that replanting the following year would be seen as the corps as a new triggering regulation. this is not the intention that congress had wlt clone water act. this overreach could prevent farmers during california's droughts for fear cht requrements or with the cuts that have been under way and have been required to have new permits. mr. chair, two other occasions previously passed and yet the corps has refused to look at this. my amendment and i urge subbesh effort. i reserve. the chair: anyone seeking time in opposition . ms. kaptur: i rise in opposition. i rise to oppose the amendment. this amendment makes a significant change to the clean water act regulations one we should no

the court goes on to say the interpretation that the government asks us to adopt defies any limiting principle. the idea of a limiting principle when the court looks at things is that the way i see it, it's a difference between something being arbitrary where there is no sort of principle that confines what can happen. if you have a law that has no limiting principle it's essentially arbitrary. this is what hyack wrote about when he wrote in the walk to serfdom. he wrote about the difference between the rule of law and arbitrary and having an arbitrary interpretation of the law. the danger to having an arbitrary interpretation of the law and the danger to having general warrants is that they have been used in the past with bias. people have brought their own bias into this. in the 1960's, the bias was against civil rights activists it was against vietnam war activists. in the 1940's, the bias was in incarcerating and in interning japanese americans. but the thing that was consistent in all of these is that there was a generalization, generalization based on the color of your skin, wh

three different cases interpreting the meaning of the word use and one interpreting the word carry higher ratio of cases to words for mobile what it says is that when there is a lot of stake many years of prison time people litigate hard. >> is the test the same year for vagueness as when determining the validity of a statute? >> i i don't think that is so clear. this court indicated there is a lesser degree of clarity required for vagueness doctrine in the sentencing context. >> when it is a mandatory -- mandatory five years no possibility. if it were up to me this person should get two thirds. really clear statement. >> let me say two things about that. the statute involves recidivism. there was never a question about what conduct was prohibited. he knew or should have known because because the statute is applied as a matter of law by courts with do novo pellet review it achieves a a level of clarity through the litigation process that will be sufficient to meet whatever heightened standard the court might impose. >> i disagree with the statement you made. because there is so many invol

section 924-c, this court had three different cases interpreting the meaning of the word use and one interpreting the word carry. that's a higher ratio of cases to words than this statute. i think what it says is that when there is a lot at stake, when many years of prison time are at stake, people litigate hard. >> is the test the same here for vagueness as when we determine the validity of a statute that specifies a crime? >> so i don't think that's so clear, justice kennedy. this court in chapman indicated there is a lesser degree of clarity required for vagueness doctrine in the sentencing context. >> why should that be when it is a mandatory -- this is mandatory as five years no possibility, in this case is such a good illustration because the judge said if it were up to me this person should get half or most what did he say, two-thirds? that would more than suffice. i'm locked into this by acca, shouldn't we demand from congress, if it wants to have that kind of enhancement really clear statement? >> let me say two things about that, justice ginsburg. this statute involves recid

used. basically, the nsa interpreted this to allow for bulk collection of meta data, but fbi gets information on a case by case basis to collect records from a business terrorist organization and they have to hand over a 15 order to internet providers like google and verizon to compel them to hand over records for a person such as calls to and from and e-mails related to an investigation. of course, the second one is the roving wiretap authority allow allowing the fbi to focus on the person not the device but continuously monitor phones even if they switch phones several times. without the authority, the feds need approval from a judge over time they get a new phone. this is an important tool but not often use. third, lone wolf provision, never used before poppy, allowing the fbi to go up on a non-u.s. citizen with no connection to a foreign there was organization. this was put in place after 9/11 because authorities were prevented from going up on convicted 9/11 conspirators because they could not connect him to a terrorist group according to our law enforcement analyst analyst. poppy? >> pa

and that means that we believe the scripture and interpretation is linked to tradition that leads us to the next one. >> and that lead to us the next one, imagine steer yum. >> that refer to the bishops led by the holy father and often in an authoritative way. >> what is an essential teaching that you may come out and declare? >> they've done in the past. but with the immaculate conception was one. it would be possible to declare the sanctity of life and being against that through abortion, that that is evil. the church has teach and that but it has not chosen that in an infallible way. >> the true presence of jesus in the eucharist. >> reporter: that means that jesus is truly present by the blood soul and deveinty. i think that is an enormous challenge in the american society. i see many young people that are good catholics, they just don't get the understanding of the eucharist. and i think part of it is you have to kneel down to receive the eucharist and you have to be focused on christ. that is truly the body and blood of christ. >> we'll gift website where we can read more about

we have had operated programs in the past with similar interpretations that allow us to collect the same information for e-mail but that is not what this case concerns. >> okay so we cannot take into account one way or the other whether somebody can say and lord knows i mean this very seriously, say to a co-conspirator of some sort don't use the phone anymore anyhow. >> i'd think the court can take that into account when it considers the interpretation of the word. i think the court can take it into account when it considers the wrath of the government's interpretation of the fifth and fourth amendment jurisprudence. >> is your position that the government is correct here than congress has authorized the same sort of -- with respect to rewards bank records in the country? >> that's exactly right. inspection to 15 permits local election than bulk collection would be permitted not just for phone records but for any records notches under section 215 but under every run-of-the-mill subpoena statute in notches in the context of terrorism investigations but the context of investigations of ess

another exciting thing that the and eight -- that the hea made for us -- neh has opened an interpretationf the to be or not to be quote and it will be in libraries and museums, but millions of people will see that look and will get a sense of not only just the source of it, but the fact that we still have these books but be able to recognize that this book still speaks to us. so the federal grants that we get are advancing, often, those kinds of research projects that we do, but also, the way that we interpret shakespeare for others. brian lamb: do you have any problem with the church-state problem? director witmore: believe it or not, we don't, we are neither church nor state. there was one book that was very popular called a sinner's libel where a misprint led to the 10 commandments reading thou shalt commit adultery, so there were a lot of people who wanted to pose with that book. we won't name names. it is interesting to me to see -- i mean, it is tough with shakespeare. there are ways that you could talk about him that are very political and that are very academic. but shakespeare is

tell us how you interpreted it? >> i interpreted it i didn't really have a choice due to my faith. we've been doing this ministry outside of work on our days off for approximately 11 months. i brought this to his attention. i consider the chief a godly man. but i know this was brought up by other people in the agency that brought it to the strict attorney's attention and who then advised him it would not be a good idea. >> we want to share with you, because when this was posted and when it got out there, a lot of people had comments out here, thousands of people commented and there were mixed opinions on it. it was a dumb move by the police chief. this man has the opportunity to impact lives and reduce crime. isn't that the goal? and then another one, if he was a public schoolteacher and tried this with the students he would be fired too. there's a time and place for everything. and finally, betty writes rules are made for a reason. he can always minister somewhere else. he should have remained on the job and let his light shine by being the best officer that he could be. starting

would be applying this law to industries beyond the retail industry of course, well beyond us in high-tech, interpret, app makers big and small, and we think the history of enforcement through the federal trade commission provides a standard that's clear and strong for businesses adapt to meet today's challenges and that involves the future. you cannot regulate your way to security. we need to employee layers of security starting with the baseline that we believe is a strong standard emboldening the federal trade commission to enforce standards and look for other ways to work together like strengthening the system and enhance the security in the system today. >> now, you mentioned, i think 50 ftc enforcement actions since 2001. that would be 3.1 a year. if you believe that ftc is your enforcement agency, do you support, then, giving tfc, then, rule making authority to make a uniform standard? >> so the ftc enforced these cases under the unfair practices act or section 5 of the ftc act. we think giving them expressed authority from congress is the right way to go about it preserving that flexibility t

the collection comes from the whole world, and being interpreted by the world, and being used by humanity. >>'s many in britain feel they are losing a trash -- a national treasure. what is a national treasure for you? >> i think that is a very silly idea. the real treasures are the objects that sit in collections. and which every generation can use differently. berlin is a great cosmopolitan city. it is a great world city. and the idea of the collections being the world in berlin, and represent berlin in the world, that is clearly the great steps that can be taken in the next 16 years. >> you mcgregor, thank you very much. >> thank you. >> back in the studio as we wrap up this edition of the journal. i am brent goff with our national treasure right here. >> [laughter] thanks for watching. we are back at the top of the hour. >> see you then. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] announcer: "euromaxx highlights." and here's your host, anne o'donnell. anne: hello and a very warm welcome to "eur

interesting to be able to talk to them in their native tongue and really bond with them without the use of interpreters and see who they really were. >> that is the best person for the job, is the theme that comes up over and over again. there are a lot of people i met who are in this story who were in jobs at one point or another that were coded for men. because their commanders were like you're the best person for the job, so you're in it. you know, there are people who served as xos or people who are doing -- number two roles or people who are in holes that were really from an hr standpoint, from a human resources standpoint supposed to be reserved for men only. but their commanders would say this doesn't make any sense, you're the best person for, it we're going to leave the paperwork blank and one gal said, yeah, i'm going to have such bad language on c-span. one gal said yeah, i looked like a shitbag for two years because it looked like she had done nothing when she was in a job that was only supposed to be filled by men. i think it's a story -- you can say what you will but there is so much lead