the problem for the people who wrote you can to terence is that if they try to claim all over usenet terrorists as work where many would argue that terence doesn't use says a use of a nuclear weapon to actually threaten to use them and that's when you enter will cause the first time you've fought to keep it straight and the spinning it was the south pacific now is in the activists that argue to have threesome created in their original question if you have to get a threat then the. nuclear states could go argued well we're only relying on terence which is a threat and so we're not ready so i waited for him. to for me is that going to go back to the court throws peter. at the time the judges agreed unanimously on the requirement for total nuclear disarmament the activists are fighting tad better opinion on. this based on. what i understand that they knew is another's wanting to do is to use the unanimous part of the opinion and i wanted to say to new zone how can we might get stronger how can we you know what are they doing that state correctness that is still illegal. is that your understanding