i've been usin' dr.h and cindy's formulas for three years, and it is amazing how great my skin looks. >> i actually went to my dermatologist, and she said, "you skin looks fantastic. what are you doing?" and i thought that it might be like candid camera. i looked around because i thought, "you're kidding me, right?" and she's like, "no. your skin tone looks better, your pores look smaller. i mean, everything's better." and i was like, "it's meaningful beauty." >> i've had the opportunity to review before and after photographs, which were taken of subjects using meaningful beauty. and what we see here is the appearance of the crow's feet are visibly diminished. we see the dramatic improvement in the redness of the cheeks in addition to a reduction in the size of the visible pores. and finally, a remarkable improvement in the appearance of these deep forehead wrinkles. ♪ >> think about it. you've got this amazing skin doctor from france, and he has this secret weapon, and you've got the world's most beauti

an i think it is up to usin this guide.our dollars, don't go to the games i think the players are overpd. melissa: my family is tampa bay did bay fans and hose ames are getting emptier because they're notplying well and people are ting with their dolars. when you see ceo running a company, you don'like it. it's the american way. we vote with our dollars on show, i give you the last wod. >> i like that. we vote our dollars. we have to pay more attention both ses of the salaries, cept for the fact that i look at the families who suffered paying high ticket prices for baseball games. the. melissa:uys, thank you t both of you. next up, a very special holiday edition. who in washington would make this year's naughty list? send me a tweet next. ♪ ♪ rocking around the christmas tree ♪ ♪ this is the quicksilver cash back card from capital one. it's not the "juggle a bunch of rotating categories" card. it's not the "sign up for rewards each quarter" card. it's the no-games, no-messing-'round, no-earning-limit-having, do-i-look-like-

well, the supreme court of the united states, usin using centu' worth of jurisprudence, looked at the language of the patient protection and affordable care act, looked at the manner in which it was written and easy concluded -- no, this is not a tax; this is a penalty. and because it's a penalty and it's not a tax, we, the court, may proceed to consider the merits of the arguments brought up in this case, merits of this challenge brought as to congress's authority fell none to enact the individual mandate under the commerce clause. and so the court quickly dispense with that issue and reached the merits of the constitutional question before it. the court then went on to conclude that congress does in fact lack the power under the commerce clause, under article 1, section 8, clause 3, of the constitution to tell individual americans that they must buy a particular product -- health insurance. not just any type of health insurance, but thed kipped that congress told americans they have to buy in the affordable care act. well, the court fairly easy and in my opinion correctly, says that