i wish there would be disc ussion. this is not about the flat tax. then at some level, you kick into a progressive tax. once you hit an extra dollar of revenue, it generates new prague -- new profit. if you are operating below the profitability, but does not necessarily generate more profit. so, i think that's been a big misconception, and it's been used to try to derail the progress we're trying to make. if you guys can help us with that, that would be great. >> in fact, that is true in both schedules that have been proposed. and the question is, what should that increment be at the low end? 2000% increase at the high-end seems a bit much. >> i agree. i think there should be plenty of room for exceptions where this was not to be an opportunistic land grab or revenue grab, if you will. to put the hurt on certain companies. the idea is to keep the revenue neutral and to meet the points you pointed out, making it equitable and addressing -- i mean, it would ability is one of the primary points, and i think it should be. otherwise, people will feel like