the planner wrote, i quote, approved, addition of two adu uz /* uz at the ground floor level. we know expansion was an issue and the permit holder convinced the planner to approve the permit, but the planner statement regarding no expansions isn't true. the expansion is hidden in another permit. if i have time, i would like to show you the floor plan for the two permits. they show existing facilities moved to the infill to make room for the adu. this should be denied because it is hiding expansion for adus. my second argument is around sunlight. a wall located at the property line replaces the light court. the following are in your brief shows a small amount of space shared by the buildings and the height of the wall relative to the building. reaching the windows on the ground floor will be reduced and maybe eliminated. sunlight is important and i want to keep the sunlight. hopefully, you have the pictures where the infill roof is nine feet above the ground, it extends the property line, an additional two and a half feet above the roof. and then you can see the windows on your