vadim frenchevich. another one round should happen, but unfortunately that a may not be one, unfortunately, we are most likely one round. i let's not confine ourselves to the second question. if one of the parties can either convince or force the beneficiaries to back down, yes, and this speaks to the united states of america if the russian federation well, it is somehow effective, well, the russian federation can be in the union with its partners in other steps, the united anglo-saxons abandon this project of destabilizing europe. but it is even more difficult, because they have invested money in it. and this is long term planning until either one side is weakened, either the beneficiary will not be interested in escalating this conflict. and colleagues continue one more bash let's get closer to us. yes , everything is correct. we outlined it absolutely correctly, but on the context, but to touch on a very important issue. here from afar. i'll start ah. here we are saying, look at this survey of ordina

vadim frenchevich.ould be one more round, but, unfortunately, and maybe not one, unfortunately, we, most likely, will not be limited to one round of me. second question. if one of the parties can either convince or force the beneficiary to back down. yes, and this is what the united states says, if the russian federation were some kind of effective, well, the russian federation can be in an alliance with its e-partners by international dialogue, it could force other steps, united with the anglo-saxons, to abandon this project of destabilizing europe. but it is even more difficult, because they have invested money in it. and this is long-term planning until either one side is weakened, or the beneficiary is not interested in escalating. this conflict will continue colleagues another big one. let's get closer to us . yes, that's right absolutely right we have outlined, but on the context, but sort out a very important issue from afar and start ah. here we are saying, look at this question of ordinary euro

vadim frenchevich.ound to go, but unfortunately, a maybe and not one, unfortunately, we are most likely one round. i will not confine myself to the second question. if one of the parties can either convince or force the beneficiary to back down. yes, and it says to the united states of america, if the russian federation had any action, well, the russian federation could be in an alliance. with its e partners in international dialogue could force other steps, united with the anglo-saxons, to abandon this project of destabilizing europe but it is even more difficult, because they have invested in it and money. and this is long-term planning until either one side is weakened, or the beneficiary is not interested in escalating. this conflict will continue colleagues one more. let's get closer to us . yes, everything is correct . we outlined it absolutely correctly, but on the context, but sorting out a very important issue from afar and i’ll start ah. here we are saying, look at this question of ordinary eu