by comparing what it seems to photos, it already has it takes just a few seconds to compasses, vaillant's camera footage. with vast databases. the accuracy is said to be high as a whole lot, but 100 percent accuracy will never be attained. but in the industry, the advances of the past 5 years have been dubbed the facial recognition revolution can always because accuracy has improved so dramatically. the systems are now very, very reliable, right? now reliable in 2017 tests, volunteers in lynn yielded success rates of 70 to 80 percent depending on the software. that's good enough for us to consider installing such systems. so are we going to be at the mercy of the state as it deploys mass surveillance and imperfect facial recognition technology? experts in generalist marcus' of the dangers 15 percent point out i was following the problem is many people don't really want to think about these technological developments at the same time. surveillance tends to be relatively discreet, which is to say, we don't necessarily see what's going on. bus stop lawyer 1st. that's dangerous, because it wi