at the un on reparations in favor of ukraine, permanent representative of belarus to the un valentin rybakoved that belarus stood at the origins of the minsk agreements and did everything to ensure that the negotiations did not however, the actions of the collective west indicate that the guarantors of the agreement have not fulfilled their obligations. the approval of the coup d'etat in 2014 , provoking for eight long years the escalation of conflicts in the donbass, support for ukraine in its refusal to comply with the minsk agreements, turning ukraine into anti-russia, ending not pumping. its weapons created all the prerequisites for both countries to become threats to each other. as for the issue of reparations, the complete lack of inclusiveness and transparency without holding any consultations once again convinces that western states have completely abandoned the principles of multilateralism, good faith and cooperation. the project does not withstand any criticism from the point of view of international law. this is just an attempt to legalize the theft of other people's assets. this

and only more polarizes him said valentin rybakov.the adoption of a resolution on reparations in favor of ukraine has lips, political motivation can boomerang back to its initiators, such an opinion was expressed to our tv channel by russian political scientist associate professor of the faculty of economics of moscow state university maxim chirkov to transfer oil such a variant of legitimacy e-e freezing, and maybe confiscation of russian resources. here, probably called. uh, similar initiatives. well, again. i am i think what it means, on the one hand, attempts to legalize it on the other. rather, it is political pressure, because there will be no real confiscation. i would generally appreciate this. ah, the resolution. well, uh, another such attempt at political pressure is nothing more. and by the way , it is very revealing that this resolution was voted for. well, a little more than half of the countries there, a little less than half did not vote for the resolution. that is, in fact, e, even well, such a serious one. pressure fr

clear position of minsk was once again outlined today by our permanent representative to the un valentin rybakovat the very creation of an icao investigation working group is contrary to the mandate of the un and creates a dangerous precedent in manipulating the fundamentals of civil aviation security. answers to key questions sent to other countries involved in order to conduct an objective and comprehensive investigation by us. so they weren't additional information was received, the belarusian side was not requested at all. the report is replete with errors, inaccuracies non-aviation and biased approaches. the use in the report of information from an anonymous source in the absence of proper technical expertise is unacceptable. in turn, the written testimony of this air traffic controller, duly submitted by the belarusian side to icao, was not taken into account. the belarusian side stated that the content provided by the authorities in the united states very convenient to the working group, supposedly an audio recording made, supposedly by an air traffic controller, is a hoax and a fake and

the time he recalled illegal sanctions against, including belarusian potash fertilizers, as valentin rybakov said speaking at the meeting, he is western power, who sooner or later will have to answer for consequences for their own peoples and millions, starving potash fertilizers, of course , cannot be eaten. but it's like you all know. guarantee of future harvests the lack of these products in world markets. and the republic of belarus , according to separate statistical calculations, takes up to a third of the world production of potash fertilizers up to one third. e lack of these products will lead to death from starvation. in addition to tens of millions of people, i would like to appeal to those who develop and implement these sanctions. you deprive people of the basic right to life, but after that you have the audacity. teach us how can we respect human rights in your natural sense? sooner or later you? will you just swept away either by their own peoples, or by millions of those. who will come to you from the countries that you are destroying today? and these people will come to you n

african institutions, there were accompanying losses in the struggle for democracy, thanks to valentin rybakoveone snorted and bashfully turned away his eyes, but nevertheless, it's all the same in what is commonly called the international and world community. i see some first rays of enlightenment, and you know what it is connected with voting for a resolution to lift sanctions against cuba after all, all countries of the world with the exception of the two states of the united states of israel voted for the thirtieth time, and once for the lifting of sanctions from the cuban republic. and yet, it seems to me that enlightenment, but we will wait for such, at least for when we were on our program we have already chosen. we have already chosen ours. yes, it's time to say goodbye. i just want to say confirmation of your words that we communicate and with entrepreneurs, deputies, the west communicates with diplomats from different countries on the verge of wild hatred in many in many countries that formally still during such votes support, the united states, they are already almost open. they say

belarus won valentin rybakov valentin borisovich remind me how did you explain to the representativesnal organization that minsk did not accept the project proposed by the west and what was the reaction of colleagues? yes, indeed , the general assembly voted on the draft resolution proposed by a whole group of western states. uh, belarus voted against this project. the reasons, uh, why we voted no are perfectly clear on the surface. uh, we disagree with several aspects of this document in connection with which we voted against the first very procedure for introducing this document, and there were absolutely no consultations, there was no discussion of this document, the document was simply submitted to the general assembly and it was proposed to adopt it . as a matter of fact, we they made, uh, serious enough efforts to ensure that before the adoption, before the vote on the draft resolution, there was a discussion, because they didn’t even want to have a discussion. we insisted that there should be a discussion a discussion was held, er, a number of states spoke out, both on the othe

the un recalled illegal sanctions in relations, including belarusian potash fertilizers, as valentin rybakovn security council, the western authorities, who sooner or later will have to be responsible for the consequences before their own peoples and millions, starving potash fertilizers, of course, cannot be eaten. but it's like you all know. pledge of future harvests shortage of these products in world markets. and the republic of belarus, according to separate statistical calculations, takes up to a third of the world production of potash fertilizers up to one third. the lack of these products will lead to death from starvation. in addition to tens of millions of people, i would like to appeal to those who develop and implement these sanctions. you deprive people of the basic right to life, but after that you have the audacity. teach us how can we respect human rights in your natural understanding? sooner or later you'll just be swept away by either your own nations, or millions of those. who will come to you from the countries that you are destroying today? and these people will come to

council at a meeting of the un security council, ambassador of belarus to the united nations valentin rybakoved to just the history of the landing in minsk in the twenty-first year of an airplane wound. listen to his very bright performance. i would like to address those who develop and implement these sanctions. you deprive people of the basic right the right to life, but after that you have the audacity. teach us how can we respect human rights in your natural understanding? sooner or later you? you will simply be swept away by either your own peoples. or millions of those who will come to you from the countries that you are destroying today? and these people will come to you not for mythical human rights in your understanding, but for a piece of bread to feed their families and their children. and you, i think, will go down in history in no way politics, but as criminals and serial killers. here indeed in the west, because they constantly say, and famine in developing countries, but sanctions on belarusian potash fertilizers remain in force and even restrictions on the export of russian fe