. >> valerie lopez on behalf of the san francisco department of public-health.we're here this morning because appellant depeeled administrative penalty is pushed total in the amount of $1,800 for unlawfully selling tobacco products without a tobacco sales permit. appellant has made two arguments. the first argument is that appellant transferred his license from one business to another. the second argument is that appellant maintained a license despite dph's deny this tobacco sales permit application. i'm going to go ahead and address the appellant's first argument. he transferred his license from one business location to another. it's unclear what license appellant refers to. the appellant holds a california department of tax and fee retail tobacco license. this state license does not authorize appellant to sell tobacco in the city and county of san francisco. the city's health code requires any individual or business that wants to sell tobacco products from the city and county of san francisco, must obtain a dph-issued tobacco sales permit. additionally, the he

valerie lopez, deputy city attorney representing the department of public health, jennifer cal ward, manager of the tobacco program dph and janine young, senior health inspector smoking program for dph. the board request you turnoff or silence all phones and other electronic devices so they do not disturb the proceedings . the rules of presentation are as follows. appellants permit holders and respondents are given seven minutes to present their case in three minutes for remodel. people affiliatedmust include theircomments within the seven or three minute period . members not affiliated have up to two minutes each to address the board in their rebuttal . mister longley are legal assistant will give you a warning. floor votes arerequired to grant an appeal or modify a permit or determination . if you have questions about requesting a rehearing please email board staff at sfgov.org. public access and participation are of paramount importance and every effort hasbeen made to replicate the in person hearing process . to enable public participation, sfgov tv isstreaming the searing live w

valerie lopez, deputy city attorney representing the department of public health, jennifer cal ward,e young, senior health inspector smoking program for dph. the board request you turnoff or silence all phones and other electronic devices so they do not disturb the proceedings . the rules of presentation are as follows. appellants permit holders and respondents are given seven minutes to present their case in three minutes for remodel. people affiliatedmust include theircomments within the seven or three minute period . members not affiliated have up to two minutes each to address the board in their rebuttal . mister longley are legal assistant will give you a warning. floor votes arerequired to grant an appeal or modify a permit or determination . if you have questions about requesting a rehearing please email board staff at sfgov.org. public access and participation are of paramount importance and every effort hasbeen made to replicate the in person hearing process . to enable public participation, sfgov tv isstreaming the searing live we will have the ability to take public commen