in addition, valery zorkin said that the withdrawal of russia and the council of europe and the tense historical times, of course, are no reason to return the death penalty. a recurring issue comes up. let's introduce the death penalty. i do not presume to speak instead of politicians instead of sociologists from philosophers legislators, because it is their prerogative, but there are legal prerogatives, including the constitutional court. nevertheless, one must carefully read the decision of the constitutional court in russia, a constitutional and legal regime of constitutional and legal has developed, within which citizens of the russian federation have received the right not to be sentenced to death. tell me, please, how to proceed in these cases in order to introduce the death penalty now ; but, probably, it is still necessary in these conditions to come to the conclusion that only a change in the constitution is due to its interpretation of the official. lol given, the constitutional court in these conditions can serve as the basis for the resumption of the death penalty. therefo

in addition, valery zorkin said that the withdrawal of russia and the council of europe and tense historicales, of course, is no reason to return the death penalty and a periodic question is raised. let's introduce the death penalty. i do not presume to say that instead of politicians the place of sociologists and philosophers is legislators, because this is their prerogative, but there is also a legal prerogative, including that of the constitutional court. nevertheless, one must carefully read the decision of the constitutional court in russia, a constitutional legal regime has developed to a constitutional legal regime , within which citizens of the russian federation have received the right not to be sentenced to death. tell me, please, how to deal with the introduction of the death stone now, i don’t want and i can’t and i don’t have the right to interfere in the affairs of the political decision of the legislature. decisions, but, probably, it is still necessary in these conditions to come to the conclusion that only a change in the constitution, since it has been given an official int

the head of the constitutional court valery zorkin, speaking at the congress, touched upon the issue of russia's withdrawal from european court of human rights. he noted that this structure played a positive role in the formation of the protection of rights and freedoms in our country. well, according to zorkin, the russian judicial system will cope without an espch. the russian federation withdrew its signature, er, the document on the establishment of an international criminal court, and withdrew from the european court of human rights. there was a lot of noise about this. how can it not cope in russia, but the caravan what is called is coming and we must think that, of course, we will not forget about put the european court, which he played in the formation and development. uh, protecting rights and freedom in our country. but i think that only this conclusion does not boil down to this, because it is no secret that in recent years there have been peculiarities. noticeably, the politicization of this body has intensified, unfortunately. it was reported that russian troops were con

a frankly political coloring of national justice does not need import substitution, emphasizes valery zorkinnd touches on the resonant issue of a moratorium on the death penalty. only a change in the constitution , since it has been officially interpreted by the constitutional court in these conditions, can serve as the basis for the resumption of the death penalty, but let me remind you that this article twenty refers to chapter two of the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, and the fact is that the constitution is so structured to change this. and to introduce traitors a different meaning, it is necessary to practically adopt a new constitution. therefore, if those authors who advocate it are ready, well, what is called a bottle in the hands of humanization, one of the key tasks of the russian legal system is increasingly using alternative punishment that is not related to deprivation freedom in 2016 to 2021. those who received a real term became less by almost 20%. the president of russia compares the country's judicial system with olympus, and such a comparison implies a special resp

nostalgic about the echr, this is not worth the statement of the head of the constitutional court valery zorkin. the russian federation withdrew its signature under the e-document on the establishment of an international criminal court and withdrew from the european court of human rights, there was a lot of very noise about this . how can it not be done in russia, but the caravan what is called is moving on and we must think that, of course, we will not forget about the positive role of the european court, which it played in the development of weight and protection of rights and freedoms in our country. but i think that only this conclusion does not boil down to this, because it is no secret that in recent years the politicization of this body has noticeably increased, unfortunately. russian troops advancing in the donetsk direction reported today in the ministry of defense, the military department said that the attacks of the armed forces in the kharkov region and the lc were repelled. but in the donetsk direction, russian troops continue offensive operations in a day in this direction, more t

the chairman of the constitutional court, valery zorkin, stressed that the withdrawal of our country from the council of europe is not a simple modern world reality - this is not a reason to return such capital punishment in russia. in addition, this will require serious amendments to the main document of the country. only a change in the constitution, since the official interpretation of it was given by the constitutional court in these conditions, can serve as the basis for resumption of the death penalty, but let me remind you that this article twenty refers to chapter two of the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, and the fact is that the constitution is structured in such a way that in order to change this article and introduce it to give it a different meaning, it is necessary to practically adopt a new constitution. therefore, if uh, ready those authors who advocate it. well, what is called a bottle in hand and another topic that the president raised. this is a crime of the nazis during the great patriotic war. putin noted that in collecting evidence of atrocities the work

now society is quite actively discussing the need for a return to capital punishment, but valery zorkinalled that the constitutional court has already twice supported the preservation of the moratorium; to abandon it would mean some degradation of the legal system in russia ; but we should not refuse mercy just because russia has withdrawn from some international yuri. institutions such as the european court of human rights, for example, her hrc in recent years, according to in the opinion of our lawyers, zorkin has become too politicized and incompetent, citing the statement of the former deputy head of the echr, arguing that in russia siberia begins three hundred meters beyond the moscow ring road under siberia. this lady probably meant total lawlessness and legal nihilism, referring to the participants of the congress. vladimir putin said the life of any person is determined by certain moral and legal norms, the final word on the application of these norms. e are in the hands of ships that stand on the very top. the legal system is at the very top on the olympus of this legal system

a frankly political coloring of national justice does not need import substitution, emphasizes valery zorkinresonant issue of a moratorium to the death penalty. only a change in the constitution , since it has been given an official interpretation, the constitutional court under these conditions can serve as the basis for the resumption of the death penalty, but let me remind you that this article twenty refers to chapter two of the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, and the fact is that the constitution is structured in such a way as to change this article. and to introduce traitors of a different meaning, it is necessary to practically adopt a new constitution. therefore, if those authors who advocate it are ready, well , humanization is one of the key tasks of the russian legal system. increasing use of alternative punishment related to imprisonment in 2016 to 2021. those who received a real term became less by almost 20%. the president of russia compares the country's judicial system with olympus, and such a comparison implies a special responsibility. i beg you to live up to this h