they have been valua, cut off by countries very close to us.y cannot trty to keep a secret. >> people have said it is embarrassing for the u.s. we don't often see the intelligence the u.s. is acting upon, how it analyzes intelligence and uses it. here we see in the case of ukraine, we have heard from kurt volker, who said he's less worried about the leak and what allies will of the way that intelligence is being analyzed. >> mostf the damage is not so much in this case the sourcesth. there are some ways they can be compromised. most of the material we are dealings called finished intelligence. not real reporting from a particular source. analysis that drew on that reporting. a lot of it is asuch political and diplomatic in a direct intelligence sense. y of the challenges the ukrainian military is facing, the subject of a lot of the material has not been a secret. the press has been reporting on that for quite some time. what is damaging for it to be seen as something to be discussed in the u.s. government , which will hurt the ability of the u.

if the first amendmentxcdes threats because they are not socially valuae eech, we are looking how to define a threat. i guess i don'understand why -- maybe i misunderstood you, it sounds to me like you are defingt differently in a vicontext and criminal context, right? mr. elwood: i'm not sure how to answer the question. the civil protecti oers, many of them don't require showing a crime. some of them d i don't know that there really is an issue about civil threats. justice barrett: imagine this exame. let's say that a teenager in a high school says somethingik i'm going to shoot this place down. and it's devoid of all context. say it's re like the statute in virginia vs. black which instruedust the burning of the cross was sufficient for the ju tinfer intent. say there is no context at all t the school, taking the threat to the school seriously, wants the kid to bbaed from the grounds or wants him to be suspended for a w ys so they can assess the threat. it's t crime. it'ju deciding whether to keep him out. it would be state action. whatbo that? could the school do that just based o