other high-risk areas that inevitably raise the risk level and the exposure, not only by property valueses, high-valued properties, b t the cost ofof repr r and coveveryboth f f the homeneners awellll athe puic infraructure at suorts s em. so think r rds and idges anthat kind thing.o it--thcost of imate change has to be factored in both in public and privivate insurance and public d private finanancial support for the structures that suppoport people's homes a and where they live. >> when floods and hurricanes happen, a lot of people assume that insurance will cover everything, and what isn't covered, the federal government will then come in and make them whole. unfortunately, that's rarely the case. if i live in my own home, the federal government is not responsible for coming in and taking care of me. people need to continue to make sure they've donone everything t to prototect themselves and can't rely wholly on the federal government. >> we are looking at some commmmunities that a are puttinn climate action plans that are on the scale of millions of dollalars. for example, new york cit

never ever, roll it back and i'm worried that markets will roll it back for themselves because the valueses are at the upper end of the historical range. hopefully cross my fingers, i don't know what the heck i'm doing, i'm pretty sure when all said and done problems ahead. melissa: uber slammed with accusations of price-gouging, following the explosion of new york city. riders claim the hikes were twice as high as normal. uber tweeted an hour after the explosion turned off surge pricing. attempting to refund certain fares. gary i was out long after the explosion. i can try uber the surge was for sure still on. can they can not control the algorithm? this is really bad pr for them? >> uber one of the fastest growing companies in history, if they want to be the one of the fastest dropping companies in history, start trying to screw your clientele with surge pricing when bombs are going off. they got to be crazy and insane. look at the bad press they're getting. hopefully they get it right going forward. utter stupidity on the part of their company. melissa: kevin, they put out a tweet, surge

donald trump a few minutes from now expect to speak at the valueses voters in summit in washington, gather conservative activist. you can rudy giuliani. this comes after the republican nominee slammed u.s. foreign policy in an interview on russian today television. vladimir putin's television state. rt calls itself independent. it is not. critics say it's nothing but arm of propaganda for the kremlin. here's what trump had to say. >> look, you know, hillary clinton, with her policies polid barack obama -- we should have never gone into iraq. >> that was bush. >> but objects we went in, larry, we shouldn't have gotten out the way we got out, and the way they got out close caused isis. >> on wednesday donald trump heaped more praise on vladimir putin in stolen security formup new york city. trump said the russian president has been far more of a leader than president obama. putin called trump a, quote, talented person. carl cameron in washington. carl? >> reporter: it's a hard one to explain for the trump campaign. all this praise for putin and participation in the russian tv station's inter

, and legally and morally and politically how do we operate in a world -- how do we preserve the valueses we care about, democratic accountability, rule of law, respect for individual life and liberty how do we preserve those values in a world where the old legal frameworks development seem to give us satisfying solutions. how do we come if with new sets of rules for that murky in between space? huh do we come if with new ways to act in that murky in between space'm and that's hard. think that's the work of generations to figure that out. but i think if we don't do it we'll be in trouble. >> host: on thinking relatively recently of the case where thee u.s. government wanted to gett apple to be able to crack into an iphone that went back and forth final hill the government found their open solution. that just one example of this space continuing. how do you think the private sector fits into this picture of what was traditionally a government sphere? >> guest: right. it's going to have to fit in. if nothing else, other states, including states we view at adversaries such as russia, are bei

the best in the world, and as your president, i will defend our values and speak out against all valueselt our in any way, shape, or form. we will be united -- thank you. we will be united and unified as americans across all backgrounds and all walks of life. today we had caught this evil five completed the bombs. thank you, law enforcement. you, police. thank -- now we willt give him an amazing hospitalization. by somebe taken care of of the best doctors in the world. he will be given a fully modern and updated hospital room. and he will probably even have room service, knowing the way our country is. and on top of all of that, he will be represented by an outstanding lawyer. his case will go through the various court system for years, and in the end, people will forget and his punishment will not be what it once would have been. what a sad situation. we must have speedy, but fair trials, and we must deliver a just and very harsh punishment to these people. we must also use whatever lawful methods are available to obtain information from the apprehended suspect, to get information befor

permit companies to sell up to one-third of the aggregate valuesing shelf registration. in many ways, these provisions are at odds with the other bill that i'll talk about which provides regulatory relief towards private equity by favoring small cap public companies. it's hard for a small company to be public. it's questionable whether small cap companies should be public. when we talk about private equity, we will see one of the features is a, they have a more sophisticated ownership and b, a more concentrated ownership. for instance, the issues of run-away c.e.o. pay, less than a problem with private equity. a significant problem with public companies and again, particularly small-cap companies with diffuse ownership, which this bill would likely lead to more of. it would also remove protections like corporate governance requirements. these reduce the marketplace and hurt the stock market and the ability of companies to go public and access public capital because of the reputation of the pink sheets and the reputation of micro cap. and it is a fine line and we would ag