i know these were discussed with van holley and kate stacey. right now, the language states that appellants shall sign a letter of appeal or may have an agent authorized in writing file an appeal on their behalf. the suggestion is that we take out the phrase authorized in writing, since that is not a requirement that exists elsewhere in the state for this type of a filing. the second amendment which i have circulated would replace section e1, which is on pages 24 and 25. the language that would be proposed, which i understand was worked out between the various lawyers, would be as follows. any person or entity may appeal an exemption determination no later than 20 days after the final discretionary action for the project, provided it is prior to the conclusion of the city appeale period for city discretionary action, even if it is less than 20 days. the rest of the language, starting with the phrase "for purposes of a determination made" shall stay intact. i want to thank ms. stacey for your work on this. chairperson maxwell: thank you. we are