muslim public affairs council and dr carol swain conservative commentator a dental vanderbilt university law professor and the author of the book be the people a call to reclaim america speech and promise both of you thank you so much for being here. i want to start off carol with you since there's really no way that an elected official much less a chairman of the house homeland security committee would have the taxpayers that precious time and resources this must really be a major major threat and there there must be thousands of a violent jihadi is being recruited in america's prisons can you maybe walk us through some of the evidence backing that up i can certainly say that for the last . studies going back to i believe one thousand two thousand and two and two thousand and five we know that muslims have recruited many african-americans that a poor and i'm prison have even had relatives that have been recruited to go into islam and that i mean that's a fact and whether it's some percentage of these actually become dangerous you know to the population you know that remains to be seen but i think it'

a recent letter by professors of law from universities including emery, missouri, n.y.u., wisconsin, stanford, albany, georgia, vanderbilt and others say that clismse constitutionality cannot be squared with patent law. former attorney general my ball mukasey said the law is constitutional. another person said the constitutionality is assured because it leaves unchanged the rule that a patent issued only to one who invents or discovers. this actually returns us to a system our founders created and used themselves. early american patent law, that of our founders' generation, did not concern itself with who was the first to invent. the u.s. operated under a first inventor to register, which is a system very similar to the first inventor to file. it wasn't until the 1870's, when the courts created interference proceedings, that our patent system began to consider who was first to invent an invention. these disadvantaged independent inventors and small businesses. over time, interference proceedings have become a costly lit gailings tactic that caused some to take the path of least resistance and move jobs overseas rather th