lawrence vandyke is up after that. the a.b.a. found the interviewed that their interviewee's experience with mr. vandyke said he was arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking knowledge of the day-to-day practice, including procedural rules. how in the heck do we put these people on the bench? forget ideology for a moment. i understand that the president is not going to nominate people who might not ideologically agree with me. but these people are qualified based on their persons, who they are, how they behave in the courtroom, their knowledge, their experience. it's a lifetime appointment, one of the most important appointments we have. and when the a.b.a. finds that a nominee was arrogant, lazy, an ideologue and lacking in knowledge of the day-to-day practice including procedural rules and we go ahead and nominate him, what is the matter here? even more damaging, president trump has nominated judges who are way out on the very extremes of jurisprudence, right-wing ideologues whose views cut against the majority of americans on