that is a three vanguard group's. and chocolate. and once they had a foothold in the new world in the population of both sides of the romantic but there read out into the court center come into madrid and other centers in the case of chocolate in one of the differences between taka and tobacco is it was the lead to a phenomenon but it has the lead of also the popular level for those two were integrated. >> why did you write about chocolate and tobacco? >> one is on the face of it seems to defy our conventional image of the consequences of 1492. not incorrect and of the two hemispheres but yet it here are the two goods going in the other direction so i was interested to explore the western eastward stories biotite am also interested the intersection between culture and nature. that have strong effects on the nervous system and of the body or mediated through culture. to have cultural rituals but then it is a biological experience as well. been antidepressant threat coming out in a new way like this isotropic revolution when it be int

and not identify sort of three vanguard groups as the kind of early users. you wouldn't be surprised that colonial sort of officials, is the aristocrats returning merchants who are involved, and then a third group which might be surprising for our contemporary sensibilities are actually clergy who were a significant group, kind would go back and forth at the clergy in particular early i found in trading records, a jazz with sang okay, from his -- we have chocolate coming in, we need some to go over here, some onto our, to rome. those are the three vanguard groups. >> tobacco? >> and chocolate, together. once they had a foothold in places like seville which was the entrepÔt for this new world, not just good but particular for a population that is comfortable on both sides of the atlantic, from there it spreads out to the court centers going to madrid and two other kind of elite cosmopolitan centers in the case of chocolate, and one of the differences between chocolate and tobacco is chocolate stars, very much an elite phenomenon and ventricles and other group

when i think about all of the people who really were at the vanguard of the lgbt civil rights movement, helping us survive through the early days of a chevy-aids, -- hiv aids, these are people who we actually need to cherish and make sure that as people age, we as a community are sticking together and do with what we need to do. aging is a growing issue in san francisco generally as our population within the lgbt committee, there are some unique issues. we know about issues around and come and jobs. of course, for all seniors, including lgbt seniors, issues around discrimination unique to lgbt seniors. we heard stories of people had to go back into the closet when they go into retirement communities or nursing homes. issues are around housing, the expense of housing, issues around people losing an apartment and not being able to afford to stay in the city. but also another issue have been trying to raise and have more front and center, issues around architectural barriers. we want seniors to be about to age in place and be up to stay in their homes. for some seniors to have stable hous

you are seeing the populist wing and the vanguard conservative wing of the party, whether it is rush limbaugh or sale apparent -- sarah palin or herman cain at rallying around him. tavis: why would anybody believe that mitt romney could actually beat barack obama. and i'm not suggesting that he cannot, but i'm asking why anybody believes that he can given that he has had difficulty rallying his face behind him? >> in some ways, the most important thing happening for republicans in the past few weeks is seen the limitations for mitt romney as a candidate. he has struggled to answer the questions about his background, his personal wealth, his ability to relate to average americans, which are somewhat muted in a republican primary much more so than in a general election. on the other hand, there is one solid bandage to romney as a general election candidate, which is a lot of the upper middle class, socially moderate, slightly right of center and voters who have been so important since 1992, it suggests they see him as a plausible manager of the economy. that white and blue disaffection

tunisia was at the vanguard of the arab spring. there are many political tensions and economic frustrations, but the revolution is still on course. wyre davis, bbc news, tunisia. >> you can get all of your headlines online with our one-minute news summary or the website, bbc.com/news. >> make sense of international news at bbc.com/news. >> funding was made possible by the freeman foundation of new york, stowe, vermont, and honolulu. newman's own foundation. and union bank. >> at union bank, our relationship managers work hard to know your business, offering specialized solutions and capital to help you meet your growth objectives. we offer expertise and tailored solutions for small businesses and major corporations. what can we do for you? >> bbc world news was presented by kcet los angeles.

still, vanguard's joe davis says stay the course when it comes to investing overseas. >> we keep reminding investors that you want to embrace the world and own the global equity market, despite all of its warts. i think, at any point in time, we're going to have weakness and concerns. currently, they're in europe, but tomorrow may be china. >> reporter: most financial experts say anywhere from 20% to 40% of your stock portfolio should be committed to international equities. and most experts like to see an even split between emerging markets and developed country markets. and despite the unfolding drama in europe, strategist scott wren says it would be unwise to avoid the region entirely. >> i don't think you can expect a lot out of europe, but i still think that you probably need some sort of exposure there. but you certainly don't want to bet the farm on it, and you certainly don't want to be overweight europe. >> reporter: financial planner cary carbanaro says that hasn't stopped her clients from worrying endlessly about european stocks. >> i've had people say to me, "i don't want to be

>>vanguard is going out there and aggressively pursuing stories that we believe are important.)at current tv, we expect accountability. >>there's the school sign. here's the cigarette stand. no one has any problem with this? (vo)and current tv creates the commentary that drives the truth. this is the new current tv. >> to our viewers around the united states, around the world, and on the internet and in mental institutions everywhere, we welcome you to the first annual young turks yet another debate debate. i would like to begin by first admonishing our audience at the young turks. i don't want to hear cheering or rooting for your candidate of choice. i don't want to here a peep out of anybody. if you do say anything, you will be fired. you'll be replaced. [ booing ] >> and you will be replaced by a limbless chinese iphone worker. [ laughter ] now our candidates are all here, assembled here. it's so great to see all of you. i should first say that you look very different. senator santorum and his vest, you're both here. >> hello brian. i'd like to thank you for not letting anyb

i would say open a brokerage account at a schaub or vanguard, and open a roth ira.and i would invest that money in three mutual funds. the total u.s. stock market, the total global stock market outside the u.s. and then the total bond market. they're index funds. track those. put an equal amount on each. don't buy individual stocks or that stuff. if he can contribute to those in the next 40 years, he will be in great shape. >> human nature shows investors, the average joe investor tends to buy high and sell low. >> he'll be beating most of the pros. >> if you have a question you want answered, send us an e-mail at any time at cnnhelpdesk at n >>> a little bit of political pop for you on this primary day. stay with me. pious baloney. this is a phrase now with the argument between newt gingrich and mitt romney. >> i know the red light doesn't mean anything to you because you're the front runner. but can we crop a little bit of the pious baloney? you've been running consistently for years and years and years, so this idea that consistency suddenly runs through your min

number one, in the 1960's, liberals had an idea and many still do that the courts are naturally the vanguard of social justice and will be the last resort in the face of a hostile confrontation of political practices. that has not been historic in many ways the progressive jurisprudence of the warren court was historical for a very long period of time they had occupied the role and one could see the zero later court the roberts court. and at most, they are bag being the political process. to the extent because politicians ultimately a point* to the federal judge. they'll lag eighth political process but not escaped from it and it is important to note. but also it is not just the conservative effort to take over the judiciary which is a natural part six of the political process which anybody in power tries to do but the narrowing of ideas is the reliance on the courts or individual rights that left us without other options when that is what we want to focus on in the book. >> host: the other options of policy? >> changing hearts and minds. the whole new way of thinking about a question primar

the 1960s, liberals have an idea your theyd think many still do, that the courts are naturally the vanguard of social, the courts are going to our last resort in the face of the hostile political conversation or political projects. that hasn't been the historic role of the courts but in many ways the progressives, the has progressive jurisprudence of thn warren court was a historicalr a blip, and partners upgraded timt the courts hadn't occupy that will. they were quite conservative. one could see the later court, e the roberts court has returned to form. at at most the court, they are lacking the political process,ls and so to the extent you have a to political -- because politicians all to appoint a federal judge, so they lack the political process but they're not really t distinct from it. andh es that's something that is important to note. but i would also say that it's m not just the conservative efford to take over the judiciary, which is of course a natural part of the political process, note what any power of partyo would try to do.political ocess >> right. >> but it's also a narrow

vanguard, fidelity have less expensive. t.owe price is another good one, because that automatically deducts every month and you can get in, sneak attack under that $2,500, for 50 bucks a month. and you don't feel it coming out of your paycheck, it doesn't hurt that bad. >> a facebook user asks, what do i do with unwanted gift cards? regift them, right? i don't know. >> is that -- that's what i got in the mail from you? thanks so much, don. i was wondering, what is this flying biscuit gift card that i get from don lemon? you are probably the easiest person to get. you are always going to want a tie of any color. you are going to be that guy that is so appreciative of that. but it's a serious, you know, question, when you are looking at the gift cards. there are a couple of really great sites where you can swap them. let's say you got a shake shake card and you are really a vegetarian and you want a whole foods card. you can look at gift card rescue.com. and swap a gift. and you can potentially find somebody that you can swap wi

talking about $3 billion into the vanguard emerging market etf and $2 billion is the ishares emergingarket etfs. those are the most popular ones so far this year. people want to take on some risk and they're doing it through etfs. >> sharon, thank you very much. >>> coming up, just over two hours left in the trading day, our picks for charts of the day when we come back. americans are always ready to work hard for a better future. since ameriprise financial was founded back in 1894, they've been committed to putting clients first. helping generations through tough times. good times. never taking a bailout. there when you need them. helping millions of americans over the centuries. the strength of a global financial leader. the heart of a one-to-one relationship. together for your future. ♪ borrowed technology from ferrari to develop its suspension system? or what if we told you that ferrari borrowed technology from cadillac to develop its suspension system? magnetic ride control -- pioneered by cadillac, perfected in the 556-horsepower cts-v. we don't just make luxury cars. we make ca

it's important to understand hunters have been in the vanguard of conservation and now that they realizet their bullets are putting eagles at risk are now moving to non-lead alternatives which are available on the market. >> let me ask how many other eagles could be at risk? >> like the wildlife center reports, several eagles dying each year. we get similar reports from other rehab centers around the country. this is a nationwide problem. it affects not only the bald eagle, our nation's symbol, but the golden eagle and ravens and other scavengers that find carcasses and gut piles and things out in the wild. >> hunters are now trying to think of different ways when they go hunting. is there anything else that can be done to prevent this from happening? >> the best thick they could do is to use -- thing they could do is to use nontoxic ammunition. if hunters try to bury their gut piles or cover them up so that eagles and other scavengers can't easily get to them. >> what are the chances of the eagle being treated right now surviving? >> it's a very uphill fight. lead poisoning usually does

they think that many still do, that the courts are naturally the vanguard of social justice. the court's going to be a last resort in the face of a hostile political popular conversation or political profit. that has not been heavy historic role of the courts. in many ways the progressive era , the progressive jurisprudence was a historical. for a long time the courts have not occupied devil. there were quite conservative. one could see the later courts as a returned to form. that, at most the courts are lagging the political process. and so to the extent you have a political process -- because, of course, the politicians ultimately appoint federal judges. so they lack the political process, but they're not really distinct from it. that is something that is important to note. but i would also said that it is not just the conservative effort to take over the judiciary which is, of course, a natural part of the political process, what any party in power would try to do. >> right. >> but it is also the narrowing of ideas about social injustice, the reliance on courts, the relian

channel 4 news has been given access to three groups in the vanguard of anti-putin protest. these are the most notorious and secretive of st. peter burg's revolutionaries. they're currently in hiding and there's an international warrant out for their arrest. their name means war. on new year's eve they set fire to a police transportor. claiming this was their gift for all political prisoners. they've turned over police cars in protest. the aim here, they say, is to create works of art which humiliate the authorities and inspire dissent. here they soldered and screwed shut the doors of a restaurant owned by a putin supporter. the three ring leaders live by stealing food and clothing. and they're constantly on the lookout for the police. they keep their home address secret. it's so run down that they have no piped hot water. two of them were in prison for three months last year until the graffiti artist posted 80 thousand pounds bail. they're bringing up a two-year-old child here. even he has to sleep in a cardboard box to keep warm. putin they believe will stay cozy in his po

it's grown so rapidly that you find that the folks were at the sort of vanguard in the field, there arevery few of them. it isn't like you can go, nowadays you probably could come but i know that when he went to stanford back in against the 1980s, i'm probably making him older than he is, maybe 1990s, he had to actually shop around for a college professor to teach them something because he had grown up playing with computer networking systems and to such a new thing that he developed a very high level of proficiency on his own. and it was really difficult to find someone who could tell him or teaching anything. and i think that level of skill has continued. and it has developed in different individuals for different reasons. but that's how i see them. it's interesting to look at that if you talk to andre back in jersey, andrew ludwig, some of those guys are basically self-taught. >> entrÉe, i think he went to community college and he was running a security, he was a i.t. security every small company in new jersey, and to discover that somebody over the weekend had broken into his networ

monroe led a vanguard of men across the river in that important battle. their job on the morning before the war was to secure the street heading into town so that no one would be able to alert the british and their allies as to what was about to happen. it was christmas, there'd been some revelry, they thought the hostilities had ceased for the season, and they were unprepared for the attacks. in the process, james monroe and his men alerted a doctor, they woke him up, he started cursing at them because he thought they were british. when he realized they were patriots, he told them, i, too, am a patriot, and it seems something is going to happen tomorrow, and i'm going to go with you because i may be able to save some poor soul. well, that poor soul turned out to be james monroe. he charged the cannons, was struck down by a bullet and would have bled out right there in the street before trenton had it not been for the doctor. this is one of two incidents in the book where james monroe narrowly escapes death. one of the things i focused on was just how pre

folks who would criticize newt as not being conservative i can tell you he was one that was in the vanguard of developing the modern conservative movement as far as getting control of things. there's one thing i want to leave with you is newt keeps talking about when you hear him speak, i'm not asking you to be for me, because if you just are forming you will elected and then you say i hope he takes care things that he says i want you to be with me. the reason that's important is this is bigger than newt gingrich. this needs to be a movement about turning this country around and getting back to constitutional principles and living based on what the constitution says that the federal government has gotten so far beyond what our founders intended its role to be. i can member one time, i never even mentioned this to kathy i don't think him but i was sitting down with newt and probably the late 1980s, it might've in 1990 at a meeting in atlanta. he made the point he had criticized ronald reagan to his face about not doing more to reverse the entitlement programs and get more conservative ideas

what does the volcker rule do to the -- i've talked to some of the folks from there fidelity and vanguard, and i've heard some of those arguments, and i'd like you to state them for the record. >> if you take a look at the high-income market versus the investment-grade corporate market, it's probablily three times the size just from a new issue perspective on an annual basis over the last couple of years. so if you think that there's any sort of fear that liquidity will dry up, which it will based upon people's inability to take risk or for fear of dealers to take risk because they don't want to, you know, they don't want to be at odds with the regulators and the rules that are being implemented, you're going to see a market that is three times the size of the high-income market approach spreads that are and liquidity that are in the high income market. and that's a significant, that's a significant change as far as the liquidity that's going to be provided. >> so people have their hands up. would you like to add to that? >> yes. >> others? >> i completely agree with what mr. marx just sa

the folks who would criticize newt is not conservative, he was one in the vanguard of developing thene thing i wanted to leave with you is new keeps talking about when you hear him speak, i'm not asking you to be for me because if you are just far may come you elect me and say i hope new takes care of things. i want you to be with me. the reason that is important as this is bigger than newt gingrich. this seems to be a movement about turning the country around and getting back to constitutional principles of living and what the constitution says. the federal government has gotten so far beyond that in tenders unshared founders intended it to be. i've never even mentioned this to kathy i don't think that i was sitting with newt and the late 1980s, might've been 1890 in atlanta and he made the point that he had criticized ronald reagan to his face about not doing more to reverse the entitlement programs and get more conservative ideas pushed while reagan was president. reagan told him that we had just started this process. it's up to you to continue. he did when he was speaker. he met

i can tell you he was in the vanguard of developing the modern conservative movement. the one thing i wanted to leave with you is that newt gingrich talked about when you hear him speak. if you just are for me, you will let me. he says i want you to be with me. the reason that is important is it is bigger than newt gingrich. it needs to be a movement about turning the country around and getting back to constitutional principles and living on what the constitutional amendment says. i can remember one time, and i never even mention this to kathy, but i was sitting down with you gingrich in the late and he maybe 19 '9090's criticized ronald reagan to a space about not doing more to get more conservative ideas pushed while reagan was president. reagan told him that we had just started this process come up to you guys to continue it. he met great opposition from even amongst republicans, because he was pushing for conservative change as they were not used to. that is why a lot of folks said negative things. it is because he was pushing the conservative ideals we talked abou

revolutionary people in the millions and millions of the leadership of the revolutionary communist vanguard and are conscious of the need for revolutionary change and determine to fight. now, we are not at that point yet. but how would you get from where we are now to the point where such a revolution is possible, were such a revolution could be made? and this is something that we've addressed, and we've got a strategy statement that i also encourage people to check out. it's one of the essays in the book, basics, that is talking about before. this statement says some things about why revolution could be possible in a society like this, but then it also poses what is it that people who see the need for revolution need to be doing right now. and then it goes on to answer that question i sang fighting the power and transform the people for revolution is a big part of the answer. now, what this means is building resistant in a way that enables people to raise their heads. to get a better sense of what they're up against, who the enemy is but also due to potential friends and allies are and wha

they are absolutely fundamental for us to stay at the cutting edge of innovation at the vanguard of global competition. but that requires us to retain what we do unassertive coproduction between business university. and the public sector. i thought it might be helpful asserted a platform better for you to describe why the mckinsey interest in advanced industry and why we need perhaps even to reframe the conversation about manufacturing in this way. >> well thanks, bruce. it's another to be here and also work with hurricanes. mckenzie and perkins are working in close collaboration on this topic because we also think it is vital. you are to mention i think it's a bit background effect are in the various companies or businesses that are in it. a couple of more facts may be just on why we think it's important to them. maybe some of the things we done of what we see is being some of the imperatives. his wrath at those industries we talked about, automotive assembly, national defense, medical devices and so forth. it is about 10% of the u.s. gdp. that is the size of it. it's about 45% of our exp

. >> i think newt gingrich is at the vanguard of the anti-romney crowd in south carolina, though you a certain number of percentage points as well. so they all play a role if they all stay in during the next ten days. it's ten days 'til the south carolina primary. >> steve: exit question really, really fast. ron paul, big achievement last night. >> absolutely. and if republicans don't focus on the fifth to a quarter of the vote that ron paul is getting, heavily from young people, they're not going to win in november. >> steve: all right. well put. larry sabato joining us from the university of virginia. sir, thank you very much for getting up early with us today on "fox & friends." >> thank you. >> steve: we're going to step aside, be back in two minutes. put down that clicker ♪ ♪ baby, baby, come along ♪ baby, baby, come along with me ♪ [ air horn blows ] ♪ i love you and i need you ♪ just to hug and squeeze you ♪ baby, why can't you see? [ female announcer ] the space of a small suv. the fuel efficiency of a prius. ♪ well, baby, can't you see the all-new prius v from toyota. ♪ come

revolutionary people in the millions and millions who have the leadership of a revolutionary congress -- vanguard and are conscious of the need for revolutionary change in determined to fight for it. now, we are not at that point yet, but how would you get from where we are now to the point where such a revolution is possible or such a red -- revolution could be made? this is something we have addressed and we have got a strategy statement. i also encourage people to check it out. it's one of the essays in the book basics that i was talking about before. this statement says some things about why revolution could be possible in a society like this but that it also poses, what is it that people who see the need for revolution need to be doing right now. and then it goes on to answer that question by saying, fighting the power in transforming the people for revolution is indeed part of the answer. now what this means is building resistance in a way that enables people to raise their heads, to get a better sense of what they are up against, who the enemy is but also who their potential friends and al

they are absolutely fundamental for us to stay at the cutting edge of innovation in the vanguard of global competition. but that requires us to rethink what we do and these sort of co- production between business university and the public sector. at the get might help, as sort of a platform, for you to describe why mckinsey is interested in advanced industry, and why we need perhaps even to refrain the conversation about manufacturing in this way -- to refrain the conversation in this way. >> thank you. it is in honor to be here and also work with brookings. we're working in close collaboration on this topic, because we also think it is vital. as a bit of background, you mentioned the factor and the various companies or businesses in it. a couple more facts, maybe on why we think it is important, and maybe some of the things we have done and what we see as some of the imperatives. it is roughly those industries that you talked about, the automotive assembly, a defense, medical devices, and so forth, it is about 10% of the u.s. gdp. that is the size of it, but it is about 45% of our exports

they're absolutely fundamental for us to stay at the cutting edge of innovation, at the vanguard of global competition. but that requires us to rethink, um, what we do and this sort of co-production between business/university. and the public sector. i thought it might be helpful just as sort of a platform setter for you to describe why the mckinsey interest in advanced industry and why we need, perhaps, even to refrain the conversation about manufacturing in this way. >> well, thanks, bruce, and it's an honor to be here and also work with brookings. mckinsey and brookings are working in a sort of close collaboration on this topic because we also think it's vital. um, you already mentioned, i think just as a bit of background, i mean, the factor and the various companies or businesses that are in it, a couple of more facts maybe on why we think it's important and then maybe some of the things we've done and what we see as being some of the imperatives. it's roughly those industries that you talked about, the automotive assembly, national -- the defense, medical devices and so forth, it is