i would not -- support undermining the standard by granting variancesful it is a puzzle to me that if we are enforcing the law by a quantitative standard that that is something that is subject and we are not granting the variance on that law. the quantitative standard that is subject to a variance is a legal puzzle to me. the only one instance that we have grand in my 15 years of the department that is a situation where the food bank was operating food delivery services in an industrial area. they have been doing that for decades. along comes a residential building built right next door against the food bank and raises concerns about a noise violation. the noise standard was not intended to address industrial zones and that's why we grand the variance in that case. >> you understand the question is the system of the variance implied is a flexible standard not an absolute other side we would have no variance. >> we would grant a variance in -- let me give you an example. if let's say