what is now a legally nonconforming structure, but in order for them to build a deck, there is no variantce, that it would represent, because of the variants notice process that we're going through, it would represent intensification. commissioner fung: i think i know the legal language as well as you do. commissioner garcia: no, no, no -- commissioner fung: but i have also gone against variances and allowed them. commissioner garcia: i am not suggesting you are ill informed. commissioner hwang: commissioner fung, tell me why you are opposed to that deck? commissioner fung: it is interesting, some of the comments that were made today about urban living. you hear many different stories, and you hear many different sides, depending on which side of the case you are on. my issue is in certain urban settings, one wants to allow some ability to adjust to the fact that we have zero property lines and we have a certain density and we have certain less hurt rear yard setback than other areas. -- lesser rear yard setbacks than other areas. rooftop decks are notorious for being nuisances. not all ins