so, cms says okay we are going to do a 5% belfiore timbers sent vaunty, an additional reward payment for every hospital able to get people on the right antibiotic at the right time within those three hours of their presenting. that seems like the kind of thing we want to encourage the health care reimbursement system to do, assuming that the evidence truly supports it. i think that that qualifies as the payment decision by a government entity that would be forbidden and even more this early cms could make this very decision unless and until this organization wrote it up. if telenational organizations decided this was the smart thing to do, then it could go ahead and do it but as soon as they organization rhoda, now suddenly can't do it any longer. so, it has i think the problem of overreaching and overbred said and risk damaging a lot of what we are trying to achieve, so i don't think it is an improvement over the present language, although i understand the senator's concerns. franqui what it creates is enough discipline free-for-all for physician reimbursement. >> yes sir. first of