under the will vblgd 4 there was a list of things the size of the decks were to remain similar to the original ones and the highest third floor deck was to be smaller in area then the lower deck the final plans don't show this the restrictions of the future limited rear yard and the variance decision required the restrictions be posted on the permit drawings and as far as we can tell have not been poflt. we were not given the opportunity to have the drawings by the sponsors architect. and in trying to see them at the deniable we remember told they were at a veshdz reproduction service and not available to us. in terms of the lamb family is requesting as i mentioned given the size of the increased deck and the limited yard really the intent is to enforce the code to its fullest stent it's currently shown that in the document is missing a lot of important information about the construction of the firewall in particular, the structural drawings are not shown, the assembly that's required to meet the fire reading for the firewall is not detailed, the code it appears the code will require