points for the reform of the constitutional court, because despite the recommendations of the venice commissiononstitutional court until a special competitive procedure is adopted . four such judges were appointed in ukraine, and we also see low scores for anti-organic reforms so this is this anti-oligarchic bill that was worked out although it exists, experts still have questions about it, and that's why the rating is low at the moment, and ukraine in this area is waiting for an evaluation by the venice commission, so here are the points for now are not very high and the progress is very good. actually, when we talk about reforms, experts often point to steps that are actually very easy to implement, but the government is not ready to do it because of certain interests of its own. what are the biggest problematic issues? here you see what the government does not really want to do, but it will have to do it if it is necessary to actually fulfill the promise, we have actually already seen these steps that are easy to implement, but which previously caused some resistance from the government, but

it must pass this block is good for it to pass the european examination, in particular, the venice commissioniew of this, we do not have much time to do all this before the month of december, and i see that from one on the one hand, the authorities are in a hurry to adopt it, and on the other hand, i see that it is a compromise its norms with european legislation eh well no eh don’t hurry with this with this symbol and actually dear mr. oleksiy we have two points yes european legislation can actually be broken down into several examples one thing i don’t know is some spanish legislation in media affairs the other history is, for example, hungarian legislation or polish legislation, and we understand that we in the states are not all that smooth with the market and the influence of the state on the regulation, so to speak, of the activities of the journalistic fraternity i agree with you, that's why i emphasize that they should answer

her document is accepted there, for example, at the request of the european commission or the venice commissionhis way, it is as if they are explaining to everyone that everything written in it is immediately progressively, it is necessary to read it, it is necessary to read the laws, eh. and it is better to have a draft law before they become laws, in order not to have to spend huge efforts on a-ah, the abolition of restrictive norms in general, ukraine having signed the association agreement with the european union and having now received a candidacy bid for the european union, the holy pope of rome should be, that is, obey the laws more than the current members of the eu know. because we have not been accepted there yet and accordingly we have to prove our commitment democracy and freedom of speech more than even those countries that are already a member of the european union, so the task of journalists to monitor the war cannot be a reason to write off the sins of the authorities on one or another problems, that is, democracy cannot suffer otherwise . why are we then fighting the evil empir