. >> this little brain region the -- brain region, the ventral tegmental area, the vta, makes dopamineis is dr. helen fisher, a biological anthropologist and chief science advisor to match.com. she's studied how people find and fall in love for over two decades and has data on why online dating might feel debilitating. >> we know from studying the brain that we can absorb about five to nine options. and after about nine options, the brain gets overloaded. it's called the paradox of choice or cognitive overload. laura: and this cognitive overload applies everyone. helen: it is a basic brain system. it doesn't matter what color you are, where you came from, what you do for a living, or whether you're gay, or straight, trans, bi, whatever it is, it's exactly the same. laura: which brings us back to keyaira and her search for mister right. keyaira: why am i still single? and i've even asked myself that a lot. and it becomes worrisome. and the question is, i don't know. i don't know why i'm single, -- single. laura: what do you see for your future dating life? keyaira: if i was going to hav

they don't know anything else other than what the ventral capitalist taught them. they don't know how to make money. if you think making money is losing money. they have to start finding a way to make money. i feel like -- you know, the man who built, growth devotes chapters to the need to make money for shareholders while holding yourself accountable. growth was a throwback compares to most of these ceos who try to judge themselves based on weird morning reports. i'm going after it and going over this because all the started cheating last november and now it's really going to head. the market as change its attitude. profitability is in and losses are out. it makes sense, doesn't it? you are in your household and all you do is lose money, well i don't know, i like that makes money. and last friday jay powell admitted that this was the foreseeable future. let's get some points down that you can really, some fine points to remember. first, there's a practical element because it's become much harder for marginal companies to raise money. the ipo market is frozen. ther

interview with that counter -- founder and ceo and how one went to being a federal prosecutor to a ventralalists, next. but what had to be said about rising competition for china and the need for the u.s. to act on comprehensive legislation. this is bloomberg. katie: is the u.s. government that needs to take stock of the fact that right now in china, there's a quarter of a billion. we are still talking about whether there should be government central-bank digital currency. we are still studying that. ♪ ed: in the latest episode of studio 1.0 prosecutor tamed crypto venture capitalists, katie haun shares her outlook. she sits down with emily chang to discuss why she left story venture capital firm to launch her own firm, and just how hard it was to do so. take a listen. katie: what i set out to do was to continue to invest in this ecosystem that i think it was very purposeful. we have an early-stage fund that does series a and series b, then we have what we call an acceleration fund, it's not a growth fund, it's a crypto growth fund. i think those are different things. but later stage it mi

in the 19th and early 20th century, before the advance of ventral bank resolutely -- chelation and deposit insurance, and before action was taken, repeated crises did substantial damage to the u.s. economy congress should work expeditiously to past legislation to bring stable coins, particularly those designed to serve as a means of payment, inside the prudential regulatory perimeter. as a forward to continued partnership with other regulatory agencies in -- and congress to address the risk of stable coins. when a move away from the discussion of making banking safer, let me talk about the risks to banks posed by, change. as our nation in the world grapple with how to respond, banks are recently focused on the risk climate change brings to their balance sheets. the federal reserve is working to understand how climate change may pose risks to individual banks and the financial system as a whole. the federal reserve's mandate is important, but narrow. focused on our supervisory responsibilities and our role in promoting a safe and stable financial system. in the near term we plan to work wit

you should be in ventral, push your boundaries, going for it. so, that is sort of one angle. on the other side, though -- this is kind of a paradox cool view of what's texas supposed to mean. in means everything in that it is a self defining act, but it is also something that is supposed to mean nothing. something that you don't have feelings about, actually. a physical act like any other. that it would be weird if you had sex and felt bad about it or like you didn't want to do something. because why does it matter? it is just a thing. there's almost this dual idea of what sex is. everything and nothing. something you have to do, but also something you shouldn't feel anything about. you shouldn't feel emotional about. in pursuit of that ideal, young people especially, who are really opening to the social pressures feel like they have to go after these encounters. they feel like they should be doing that and that if they have some emotional blowback or a bad experience, that is their fault, personally, for not being as with it or as liberated as they should. as they are told t

tom: since the advent, 1907 to 1912 ventral banking, the conundrum here real simple.e is the friend of policymakers. as weinberg predicted for greece, he was two years up from a lot of people, you work that out as well john. but the bottom line, time is your friend and truss has to understand her solution to winnable policy is to expend -- extend the fx. that's number we are seeing. jonathan: you're not alone saying that. a lot of people have said that perhaps this policy might have been the right policy in nine months time or 10 months time. it is a running time to cover the markets. tom: i can't keep up with guy. too posh. jonathan: i can't keep up with him either. he's fantastic. tom: got claims coming up tomorrow, economic data today and i still have to go back to the system, sterling is not broken, it is at 108 levels. jonathan: we talked about this, we've got global core, core government bond market trading like crypto. futures down 1%. live from new york on tv and radio, this is bloomberg. ♪ key lisa: -- lisa: keeping you up-to-date with the news around the wor

several of our witnesses have talked about the need for a national vision, and ventral strategy. certainly china and other countries are developing their own national strategy and moving ahead in this technology. we need to do the same here at home. it is critical for our global competitiveness. the way to do that is actually aligning responsibility with authority within the agencies of that one office has the authority to sign off on waivers, exemptions, approvals. right now if you want to do research and development, you can just to wait two years to get one site specific approval just to do r&d in the u.s.. it is just not acceptable. we need leadership and i'm happy that we have our own proposed one on this. i'm happy to follow up with you and your staff as well. >> thank you, that is helpful. i've heard similar concerns from other stakeholders. it is hard to know to whom you go to even get an answer. curnow lux? >> sir, i'm gonna restate what was just said. you are right on -- when we work with industry to try to identify what requirement of what needs to be done within the f

experiences at cbo that you would have some helpful insight into how scoring a factor into what up ventral reauthorization of the spectrum auction authority would look like. when i was in the house -- subcommittee there in energy and commerce, we worked on the ravens act, it was a big point of conversation, how this was going to end up. in regards to score. in your view, what are the pros and cons of an 18-month reauthorization, as opposed to going ahead and doing one year or four year reauthorization? >> thank you for the question. if the reauthorization for 18 months allows for the work to be done, to have more direct scoring in a longer bill, that could be useful. but we all appreciate, at the end of the day, we want spectrum authority to be there for a long time. even if you extend the authority for four years or ten years, there is still an opportunity for congress to come in and have directive relocations, and those relocations will score positively. they won't score as high as they would if they also included the authorization aspect of it, but they would still have a positive score

experiences at cbo that you would have some helpful insight into how scoring might factor into what up ventraluthorization of the spectrum auction authority would look like. when i was in the house -- subcommittee there in energy and commerce, we worked on the ray bombs act, it was a big point of conversation, how this was going to end up. in regards to score. in your view, what are the pros and cons of an 18-month reauthorization, as opposed to going ahead and doing one year or four year reauthorization? >> thank you for the question. if the reauthorization for 18 months allows for the work to be done, to have more direct scoring in a longer bill, that could be useful. but we all appreciate, at the end of the day, we want spectrum authority to be there for a long time. even if you extend the authority for four years or ten years, there is still an opportunity for congress to come in and have corrective relocations, and those relocations will score positively. they won't score as high as they would if they also included the authorization aspect of it, but they would still have a positive score