it is certain that the order that set in in europe after world war i, the so-called versailles order first, although short-lived attempt to construct peace on our continent and in the world. the treaty of versailles opened the road for independence for poland but also lithuania, latvia, astonia, hungary, finland, czechoslovakia and then yugoslavia and within using slovenia, latvia, and it included the sovereignty of nations and the protection of minorities. it turned out to be that way for several reasons but not for the reasons totalitarianism and it brought the third reich which lived by an aggressive ideology, an ideology of revenge. and nazism questioned the whole heritage oeuropean civilization during the years '33 to 1938, this totaltarism system was treaties fostered by france and great britain. and already in the '30s, poland proposed a preventive and preemptive strike and this proposal was not taken up, therefore, poland assigned a nonaggression treaty with germany just as it had a similar treaty with the soup. -- soviet union. and these treaties cannot in any way be compare

the treaty of versailles and at open the route to independence -- had opened the route to independenceo poland, hungary, finland, czechoslovakia, and in yugoslavia and, and within yugoslavia, slovenia, croatia -- this treaty accounted for the sovereignty of nations and the protection of minorities. it turned out to be ephemeral for several reasons, but not least for the reason and took -- that totalitarian systems emerged. and the brink to occurrence was the emergence the third reich. it led by an aggressive ideology and, an ideology of revenge, and nazism questioned the whole heritage of european civilization. during the years 1933-1938, this system was a party to attempted treaties fostered by afrance and great britain. already in the 1930's, poland proposed a pre-emptive strike, and this proposal was not taken up. therefore: i nonaggression treaty with german just as it had a similar treatment wit -- a similar treaty with the soviet union. and these treaties cannot be in any way compared to that between them concluded 60 years later. the nazi policies led to the annexation of munich

at once -- its roots, and i agree with those who mention this, and the weakness of the treaty of versailleswhich not only registered a defeat but also humiliated germany and the wake of world war i, which was used by not he's coming to office in the mid-1930s -- by not seize nazi -- which was used by nazis coming into office in the mid- 1930s. we need to for sake political stereotypes, passed it was, and distortions of history or keep silent. it is important to understand that cawhile talking about world war ii, knots in their accomplishments -- it will result in tragedy. this is not at all any cooperation, but at plot with a view to addressing problems. one needs to admit that all the attempts made since 1934 until 1939 to appease not senazis, wee from a moral point of view unacceptable. and from a political perspective, senseless, harmful, and dangerous. the combination of all of these acts brought about this tragedy, the beginning of world war ii, and naturally we need to admit such mistakes. our country has done so. parliament has condemned such pacts, and we are right to expect that in

containing all the treaties that had been signed since he had become furher, not including the versailles treaty. only since 1993. important ones like the naval treaty, and the private secretary joked that hitler had broken every single one of them. ladies and gentlemen, that is not a man that you can do a deal with. >> more questions? yes, there's a little banged up there. let's have three questions from that -- there is a little game up there. let's have three questions from there. but your mouth right near the microphone. >> many thanks for an interesting evening. if churchill was more a liability than an asset, who could possibly have done a better job? [applause] >> we know that nazism stood for oppression. in the 1930's, the conference made it apparent what their ulterior motive was in regard to the jews. why did the proponents not acknowledge overy's point that churchill saw through although bullshit? listening to the proponents, i know that the courageous few men who stood up to chamberlain and halifax with their -- thank god they were there alongside churchill. [applause] >> who

not at once, its roots and i agree with the speaker who mentioned this in the deficient at the versailles the defeat, but also national humility of germany in the wake of the world war i. which were used by nazi's coming to office in the mid '30s. it was worthwhile mentioning the fact that to ensure a reliable sysf europe, then was not possible. while analyzing dramatic event on the verge of the world war ii, we mt exert right lesson to do that, we need to forke political stewards of the past stigmas and distortions o history, or keeping silent regarding certain effects. it is important to understand that any cooperation wh extremist, and while talking about world war ii, fascists and their competence, no matter what might be found, will be found in tragedy. basically, this is not at all any cooperation, but a plot with a view to addressing one's proble at the account of others. so therefore, one needs to admit that all the attempts made since 1934 to 1939, to appease nazis including various agreements with them were from the moral point of view unacceptable. and found a practical perspec

[unintelligible] and i agree with the speakers to mention this, and the decision of the versailles treatyaccomplices, no matter what might be found for such tragedy. tjf-/a>u;xn÷ ?oit(çólpÑi0ÑcohÑi-9ç$1çóoçcee political statement of theóoçcee political decisions to be adopted. naturally, we need to think çówithout a deep understanding f all letçy/ occurs, it will note possible for us to build a secure world, to eradicate the legacy of the cold war and remove artificial dividing lines. my country not only admits the bql a contribution in building the a contribution in building the Ñiworldw3Ñis7ÑiÑi=ñmyñrqñÑiçóÑ ÑiÑiñrÑld on the principles ths !leiÑ iñrçóxd toñr remove the real and virtual berlin wall and to ñrxdxdçóxd[Ññrwe need toÑiñrw3g xenophobia, race hatred, and Ñicynical distortions of histor. j(%-tt(áár'. the page on the history of world war two for the sake of the memory ofçó for the future of or children. the example of how we can treat such wounds of the past, and i basis of theirÑi relations betwn %ggó+t<ñ+lqñxiñÑdaavélÑÑiÑud]iw russia that has been built over recent